CJ Wiley: flat earther

AI is intelligence without morals, or true intelligence for that matter. It is derived from information fed to it. Garbage in will always create garbage out because it has no reasoning ability. It seems to reason sometimes due to the information it is factoring in that we aren't seeing.

AI is going to have to do major damage before the dangers are widely recognized. Gonna be scary!

Hu
Gotta agree. I think the immediate threat is humans.

CJ Wiley: flat earther

:ROFLMAO: See! Some good vernacular and you can be a cyber orator.

That's AI the plaything. The one they warn about though, !!11- shudder...

AI is intelligence without morals, or true intelligence for that matter. It is derived from information fed to it. Garbage in will always create garbage out because it has no reasoning ability. It seems to reason sometimes due to the information it is factoring in that we aren't seeing.

AI is going to have to do major damage before the dangers are widely recognized. Gonna be scary!

Hu

Any tips for consistently shooting with follow through?

I'm an engineer and the term is used often in speaking and writing.

In calculations and proofs, acceleration is always used.

The reason 'deceleration' is used in scientific writing is that it is the most concise way of communicating the idea at hand.

Some engineers and physicists are pedantic asshats and will not use that and similar terms, but that is an incredible mistake. Most of engineering writing is not for other engineers, it is for the less technical public. Almost all of my writing in my career has been to communicate ideas to managers, and purchasing agents; or as manuals for multi-million dollar machines so machinists could operate them. I'm not going to talk about 'negative acceleration', I'll use 'deceleration', or even, *gasp*, 'slows down'.

Technical writing is not to prove how smart you are, it is to convey ideas in the most precise, concise, and understandable way possible.

Why would acceleration always be used in calculations and proofs if deceleration is perfectly acceptable?

You made my point well. Thanks!

Hu

Filter

Back
Top