It's mostly the CS table diagram but that's a duck. If you can hit any rail shot firmly, pool table sides needn't be an issue. You maybe can't freewheel 'em like you do corners - boo hoo... Get used to 'em.
That particular angle, aim for the ball to hit the deep third of the facing. It has to go.
I modified the CS diagram. It's more like what I was talking about now. The original post might have made it seem it was a much easier shot. The angle on the new diagram is much steeper now.
Interesting they don't list a size tolerance.
On side note I have an unpopular stance. I'm partially color blind and love the new WNT set for watching on TV. I do agree they are not good looking but for the first time I always know what ball is what. I would probably never buy one for myself don't have as much trouble IRL.
At the timestamped video below, Strickland is playing Sigel in one pocket and briefly comes to the table with radio earmuffs that I hadn't seen the likes of since the 90s.
By the time he returns the table he has taken them off, but it cracked me up. Noticing the date of the video was 2017 made it even funnier given the large array of options for noise cancelling headphones worn much more subtly...
Yes to same initial size spec, but the variance on the size is tighter on the Rhodium / Bronze given no variance is listed for the Challenger (otherwise, they should list it for the Challenger). Either way, I'll continue to pay more for the Rhodium given I like the cue ball and consistent circle around all numbers design.
