2025 Reyes Cup, Oct 16-19, Manilla. Team Asia vs Team World

of course they won't
and getting chosen to play is an honor, pay or not pay.
but these events are for the fans and the fans want to see the biggest names and their favorite players and I can think of the better lineup to the ROW team.
The only substitution I would make, in my perfect world, is Filler for Woodward.

I would not add SVB given his seeming ambivalence to the Mosconi. He would be the better marketing choice, but maybe not the better player choice.

A case for Eklent Kaci could be made to add a whole lot of spice.

2025 Reyes Cup, Oct 16-19, Manilla. Team Asia vs Team World

Most pool players won't object to an all-expense paid trip that gives them a chance to boost their profiles.
of course they won't
and getting chosen to play is an honor, pay or not pay.
but these events are for the fans and the fans want to see the biggest names and their favorite players and I can think of the better lineup to the ROW team.

2025 Reyes Cup, Oct 16-19, Manilla. Team Asia vs Team World

to me it looks like politics is back at the table over the enjoyment of fans (Mosconi and Reyes are all about fun for the fans).
instead of faulting the players, they should do a better job at planning the year and not overlapping events.
If I was at a level of a pro player, a world title would mean to me much more than some open event, both on a personal level and business levels.
AS sjm recounted on the Hanoi thread, the Mosconi and Reyes were patterned after the Ryder's Cup.


The Ryder's Cup also went through numerous changes over the years. Tons of changes, in fact. Most were geared to make the event more popular with players and fans.

More players, more wildcards, very late selections of the final wildcards. In fact, the last wildcards are typically picked a week before the event after a late qualifying event. Much like what is happening this year with the Reyes and Mosconi. The organizers want to keep fans in suspense and speculating.

Internal politics has also been involved. in the Ryder Cup. I know some don't like it, but it tends to gin up controversy and interest. Both are which are good for the bottom line of the event.

For most of its history, Ryder Cup participants were not paid. They do get a big stipend now and money to give to charity.

So why did/do players play? I am sure honor and prestige play a role, but the Ryder Cup makes big players even bigger, and can help turn lesser names into bigger names. That means more fans and followers and bigger marketing and advertising opportunities.

It can be a quite lucrative thing.

The Mosconi is no different. I would argue that success in the Mosconi is just as big, in marketing terms, as winning a "World" title. It's the most watched event in pool by players and fans.

Jayson Shaw, Niels Feijin and Skyler Woodward are among many players who developed big reps from their Mosconi play.

Take Duong Quoc Hoang. After last year's event, every WNT/WP pool aficionado now knows his name.

Aloysius Yapp, for his part, used his success in the Reyes last year to give him the confidence to catapult his career this year.

Pool players are guaranteed a certain amount of money by participation. And Matchroom foots the travel bills of the players, unlike with its "major" events.

Most pool players won't object to an all-expense paid trip, with a guaranteed payout, that gives them a chance to boost their profiles.

Men's 2025 World 8-Ball Championship, Bali, Oct.7-13

I disagree a bit here. In rotation games decision-making is straightforward on 95% shots and most of the time you only need to adjust your position play plan a bit according to the cueball. In 8-ball there are more shot selection choices, more replanning the patterns and risk-evaluation. Even on an open table players tend to eliminate risks by re-evaluating their original patterns, you often see even top players going for a certain pattern and then changing their minds because the cueball fell 4” off the intended position to enable highest runout percentage. Perpetual re-evaluation is heavy on shot clock.
In all 3 games on a pro level, a good spread but dry break will lead to a loss.
A bad spread with a ball made will keep you on the table and in control, even if your next shot or one of the shots down the line will be a safe.
A good spread and a ball made is pretty much a run out in all three.

In the last World 10 ball championships, most players broke from the side even if it ended in a harder spread because the chance of making a ball was higher and less dangerous than a center break that gives a good spread but many times ends up dry.

ID help with Pawn Shop find!

That's a nice looking older sneaky. Got a lot of miles on it but probably pulled in a lot of change for the owners. $100 no problem! You probably got it in a PS for 50.
That's a nice looking older sneaky. Got a lot of miles on it but probably pulled in a lot of change for the owners. $100 no problem! You probably got it in a PS for 50.
$20…..😜

Filter

Back
Top