Knock off or real Xbreaker?

manwon said:
I don't think there is a differance between a knock off and the real thing!

That's not true and it's unfair.

Even if they were both made in China which they weren't then it would still be unfair.

The Kao Kao factory for example has state of the art facilities and over one million pieces of shaft wood hanging just like the best cue makers do it. Each and every one of those pieces is dated and marked as to when it was cut and what stage it's at. They have hundreds of thousands of butt sections stored in various stages of drying and cutting.

They make cues in the traditional ways as well as in high-tech ways with CNC controlled processes.

They make full splice, short splice, butterfly splice, finger splice, cored, laminated, flat laminated, pie laminated, laminated and cored, threaded parts, recut points, traditional points, cnc inlay, decal overlay, wood worker's spliced inlays, and so on. They use the same parts that American cue makers do, they buy from the same sources.

The Chinese cue making that you are bashing is a result of training by highly accomplished, well known and well respected United States cue makers and cue companies. I can't speak for any other company than Kao Kao but as far as I know they and their main competitor are able to build cues on par with anyone else in the world.

These bash Chinese cues in general comments need to stop. Just realize that the cue industry here is grown up and getting better and stronger.

There is no excuse for ripping off X-Breaker and no excuse for trying to sell the knockoffs as "unbranded" X-breakers. That's just sleazy.

But to imply that there is no worthwhile cues coming from China is wrong.

If you want to I will bet that jump for jump and break for break the Fury Jump Break cue will perform as well or better than any other on the market that is in the same weight class. Figure out a way to test them and I will put my money where my mouth is. And I will eat crow if I lose and go back in and figure out how to make it better. But until someone can PROVE that their cue is better conclusively I will stick to my conviction that there is no break cue and no jump cue that is inherently better than the Fury and it's made in China.

And yes I have owned a Mace Break Jump. Rick Howard got his first piece of stainless steel from me when I was in Panama City for a while.

This wasn't intended to be a commercial for Fury but it's the cue I am most familiar with right now so I use it as the example.
 
I own a 2nd gen & 2 Samsara gen X Breakers. The Sam's are superior imo. I don't know if they're the best in the world, ever, for all time... I can tell you they're solid, well constructed, nicely finished tools that do their job to every extent the user is capable, and they hold their value very well.
 
Look, there is nothing wrong with cue being made in China.. they are people just like us, actually im half chinese and whatever we can do they can to, its not like they cant have the same exact equipment, the only thing is that they are more money driven and want to make more money instead of a rep. I dont like it when people talk crap about cues from china. I really dont think its completely fair..
 
filluptieu said:
I wonder... it looks like the same g 10 setup as the X breaker, does anyone have on? maybe they can authenticate

Why would anyone want to authenticate a Chinese cue, the authentication would cost as much as the cue!!!!!!!!!:smile:
 
JB Cases said:
That's not true and it's unfair.

Even if they were both made in China which they weren't then it would still be unfair.

The Kao Kao factory for example has state of the art facilities and over one million pieces of shaft wood hanging just like the best cue makers do it. Each and every one of those pieces is dated and marked as to when it was cut and what stage it's at. They have hundreds of thousands of butt sections stored in various stages of drying and cutting.

They make cues in the traditional ways as well as in high-tech ways with CNC controlled processes.

They make full splice, short splice, butterfly splice, finger splice, cored, laminated, flat laminated, pie laminated, laminated and cored, threaded parts, recut points, traditional points, cnc inlay, decal overlay, wood worker's spliced inlays, and so on. They use the same parts that American cue makers do, they buy from the same sources.

The Chinese cue making that you are bashing is a result of training by highly accomplished, well known and well respected United States cue makers and cue companies. I can't speak for any other company than Kao Kao but as far as I know they and their main competitor are able to build cues on par with anyone else in the world.

These bash Chinese cues in general comments need to stop. Just realize that the cue industry here is grown up and getting better and stronger.

There is no excuse for ripping off X-Breaker and no excuse for trying to sell the knockoffs as "unbranded" X-breakers. That's just sleazy.

But to imply that there is no worthwhile cues coming from China is wrong.

If you want to I will bet that jump for jump and break for break the Fury Jump Break cue will perform as well or better than any other on the market that is in the same weight class. Figure out a way to test them and I will put my money where my mouth is. And I will eat crow if I lose and go back in and figure out how to make it better. But until someone can PROVE that their cue is better conclusively I will stick to my conviction that there is no break cue and no jump cue that is inherently better than the Fury and it's made in China.

And yes I have owned a Mace Break Jump. Rick Howard got his first piece of stainless steel from me when I was in Panama City for a while.

This wasn't intended to be a commercial for Fury but it's the cue I am most familiar with right now so I use it as the example.

John, I love Chinese production cues, hell they keep me and many others in business doing repair work. I have see every form of Chinese production cue come across my counter including Fury cues and I admitt some products are better than others. Some are pretty good, and some are really trash however, even with the best products there are still problems with quality control of materials and adhesives being used.

I also think that the best Chinese production cues certainly do come from Kao Kao and they are most certainly the leader of production facilities in China. I like some the cues that are they producing, I think that the Lucasi, players, Fury brands and some others are produced to a good standard. However, when you get past the $300 price range they don't stack up to the best quality prodcution cues made in the USA. But it's really Apples and Oranges the truth be know most buyers don't know what they are buying anyway and don't care either. All they know is what some else said or they have preconceived idea's that have little if any basis in fact.

I see it every day, some one walks into my retail store and says I have to have this certain model cue, because I tried my friends, or because Joe told me this is what I need to buy, or I saw this cue advertised and I love the way it looks. I have nothing against Chinese cues and I agree that they will be equal some day to the top tear productions cues made in the USA. But John, that day is not here yet, talk to anyone who does large scale cue repair if you want opinions. In addition John remember, I have nothing at stake, I represent no company, my assessment of cues is based solely upon repairs that I see that are frequent. It doesn't matter to me who is ahead or behind in the market, the only thing that is important to me is that they continue to produce cues in China, Japan and the USA.

But until someone can PROVE that their cue is better conclusively I will stick to my conviction that there is no break cue and no jump cue that is inherently better than the Fury and it's made in China.

And yes I have owned a Mace Break Jump. Rick Howard got his first piece of stainless steel from me when I was in Panama City for a while.

This wasn't intended to be a commercial for Fury but it's the cue I am most familiar with right now so I use it as the example.[/QUOTE]


John what does inherently better mean in the above context?

I have been a dealer for Mace Jump break cues since 2003, when did Rick get his first piece of Stainless Steel from you? Oh, and by the way NO Asian Jump Break cue is made to the Quality Control Standards, Quality of Material Standards that Rick uses to build his Jump Break cues.

Thanks for your opinions John, but the above are mine and they are based upon my experience doing repairs. I also know that your opinions are based on your experience which is in many areas but arguing these points will get you no where, I no what I see and I have know Corporate reason to be bias.

Have a good night John!!!!!!!!!
 
One more picture of the butt.

DSC00739.jpg
 
manwon said:
John, I love Chinese production cues, hell they keep me and many others in business doing repair work. I have see every form of Chinese production cue come across my counter including Fury cues and I admitt some products are better than others. Some are pretty good, and some are really trash however, even with the best products there are still problems with quality control of materials and adhesives being used.

I also think that the best Chinese production cues certainly do come from Kao Kao and they are most certainly the leader of production facilities in China. I like some the cues that are they producing, I think that the Lucasi, players, Fury brands and some others are produced to a good standard. However, when you get past the $300 price range they don't stack up to the best quality prodcution cues made in the USA. But it's really Apples and Oranges the truth be know most buyers don't know what they are buying anyway and don't care either. All they know is what some else said or they have preconceived idea's that have little if any basis in fact.

I see it every day, some one walks into my retail store and says I have to have this certain model cue, because I tried my friends, or because Joe told me this is what I need to buy, or I saw this cue advertised and I love the way it looks. I have nothing against Chinese cues and I agree that they will be equal some day to the top tear productions cues made in the USA. But John, that day is not here yet, talk to anyone who does large scale cue repair if you want opinions. In addition John remember, I have nothing at stake, I represent no company, my assessment of cues is based solely upon repairs that I see that are frequent. It doesn't matter to me who is ahead or behind in the market, the only thing that is important to me is that they continue to produce cues in China, Japan and the USA.

But until someone can PROVE that their cue is better conclusively I will stick to my conviction that there is no break cue and no jump cue that is inherently better than the Fury and it's made in China.

And yes I have owned a Mace Break Jump. Rick Howard got his first piece of stainless steel from me when I was in Panama City for a while.

This wasn't intended to be a commercial for Fury but it's the cue I am most familiar with right now so I use it as the example.


John what does inherently better mean in the above context?

I have been a dealer for Mace Jump break cues since 2003, when did Rick get his first piece of Stainless Steel from you? Oh, and by the way NO Asian Jump Break cue is made to the Quality Control Standards, Quality of Material Standards that Rick uses to build his Jump Break cues.

Thanks for your opinions John, but the above are mine and they are based upon my experience doing repairs. I also know that your opinions are based on your experience which is in many areas but arguing these points will get you no where, I no what I see and I have know Corporate reason to be bias.

Have a good night John!!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]


If you are a dealer of Mace cues then you also have a bias to tout a brand you sell over one you don't.

Inherently better means that in a controlled experiment designed to show off how the cues perform under the same conditions then one should show better performance. I have a list of jump shots that are all shots which come up in game situations over and over. I contend that there is no jump cue that is inherently better at all the shots than the Fury. Some like the ultra-lights are somewhat better at the super closeup shots and then not better at the longer shots where more control is needed. However even here it is my experience (gleaned from the countless exhibitions and jump clinics I have done) that technique plays a big part.

As for the break I submit that the break is more a matter of personal ability and timing rather than the cue. I have never felt and never will that one cue "breaks" better than another one. However I think that some cues can propel the ball faster due to the tip and the taper. Thus it is possible in theory that the cue ball can be made to go into the rack at a faster speed with less applied force with some break cues.

I don't think that there is any significant difference between the Fury Break cue and others but I would be the first to admit I was wrong if someone, anyone, could show it on tape in a controlled manner.

Back to quality of Chinese cues.

I am sure that they do keep you in business with repairs. Cues are a collection of parts that don't want to be together, wood, plastic and steel. But since you don't actually know what adhesives are in use, (do you?) I think that you are not qualified to state categorically that Chinese cues are all made to lower quality standards. If so then the it's to the standards set by WELL KNOWN and HIGHLY REGARDED cue makers from the USA.

And as I said before the Chinese cue making industry is grown up now. The cues on the market however are ones that span 30 years. So a cue made ten years ago is likely to be in bad shape whereas one made this year may still be in great shape ten years from now.

But I will concede that there are a lot of smaller factories who don't have the benefit of being trained by America's best cue makers. They don't have the access to good wood and parts like the bigger ones do. So yes, there are a lot of cues coming in and being sold that aren't made to the highest standards, those being the standards that the American cue makers build to.

So people should stick to the brands which are backed by reputable companies like Sterling whose cues come from Kao Kao.

Rick got his first piece of stainless steel from me in 1991 when I was in Ft. Walton Beach (I mistakenly said Panama City earlier) visiting a friend. I had a hunk of stainless that was the jump handle of a jump cue I owned. I traded it to Rick for a rewrap on one of my cues.

I agree with you though that a Mace break jump cue is a GREAT cue to own. As are the Lomax break jumps and the Joe Piccone break jumps among others I have owned.

John
 
JB Cases said:
[/B]

John what does inherently better mean in the above context?

I have been a dealer for Mace Jump break cues since 2003, when did Rick get his first piece of Stainless Steel from you? Oh, and by the way NO Asian Jump Break cue is made to the Quality Control Standards, Quality of Material Standards that Rick uses to build his Jump Break cues.

Thanks for your opinions John, but the above are mine and they are based upon my experience doing repairs. I also know that your opinions are based on your experience which is in many areas but arguing these points will get you no where, I no what I see and I have know Corporate reason to be bias.

Have a good night John!!!!!!!!!


If you are a dealer of Mace cues then you also have a bias to tout a brand you sell over one you don't.

Inherently better means that in a controlled experiment designed to show off how the cues perform under the same conditions then one should show better performance. I have a list of jump shots that are all shots which come up in game situations over and over. I contend that there is no jump cue that is inherently better at all the shots than the Fury. Some like the ultra-lights are somewhat better at the super closeup shots and then not better at the longer shots where more control is needed. However even here it is my experience (gleaned from the countless exhibitions and jump clinics I have done) that technique plays a big part.

As for the break I submit that the break is more a matter of personal ability and timing rather than the cue. I have never felt and never will that one cue "breaks" better than another one. However I think that some cues can propel the ball faster due to the tip and the taper. Thus it is possible in theory that the cue ball can be made to go into the rack at a faster speed with less applied force with some break cues.

I don't think that there is any significant difference between the Fury Break cue and others but I would be the first to admit I was wrong if someone, anyone, could show it on tape in a controlled manner.

Back to quality of Chinese cues.

I am sure that they do keep you in business with repairs. Cues are a collection of parts that don't want to be together, wood, plastic and steel. But since you don't actually know what adhesives are in use, (do you?) I think that you are not qualified to state categorically that Chinese cues are all made to lower quality standards. If so then the it's to the standards set by WELL KNOWN and HIGHLY REGARDED cue makers from the USA.

And as I said before the Chinese cue making industry is grown up now. The cues on the market however are ones that span 30 years. So a cue made ten years ago is likely to be in bad shape whereas one made this year may still be in great shape ten years from now.

But I will concede that there are a lot of smaller factories who don't have the benefit of being trained by America's best cue makers. They don't have the access to good wood and parts like the bigger ones do. So yes, there are a lot of cues coming in and being sold that aren't made to the highest standards, those being the standards that the American cue makers build to.

So people should stick to the brands which are backed by reputable companies like Sterling whose cues come from Kao Kao.

Rick got his first piece of stainless steel from me in 1991 when I was in Ft. Walton Beach (I mistakenly said Panama City earlier) visiting a friend. I had a hunk of stainless that was the jump handle of a jump cue I owned. I traded it to Rick for a rewrap on one of my cues.

I agree with you though that a Mace break jump cue is a GREAT cue to own. As are the Lomax break jumps and the Joe Piccone break jumps among others I have owned.

John[/QUOTE]

If you are a dealer of Mace cues then you also have a bias to tout a brand you sell over one you don't.

No John, that is not the case at all in fact it is for from it. When I sell products I personally stand behind the quality of those products myself. My above statement only covers cues that cost above $100, so I tout nothing because if I sell it and it doesn't stand the test, I will fix it free or replace it at my discretion. So, while I do sell Asian cues I only sell those which I have had success with through trail and error, those that are under $100, those with some type of warranty, and outside of the warranty I offer no guaranty. Now this doesn't include Predator, Tiger, Lucasi or other limited Chinese brands due to their warranties which they back up faithfully and only at a customers request. Beyond that there is no reason to buy Pool Cues made outside the USA unless they are beginners cues, this country has far to many good production company's to choose from who Guaranty their products. I mean why would anyone want to send their money overseas in the first place when they can invest it where they live.

Inherently better means that in a controlled experiment designed to show off how the cues perform under the same conditions then one should show better performance. I have a list of jump shots that are all shots which come up in game situations over and over. I contend that there is no jump cue that is inherently better at all the shots than the Fury. Some like the ultra-lights are somewhat better at the super closeup shots and then not better at the longer shots where more control is needed. However even here it is my experience (gleaned from the countless exhibitions and jump clinics I have done) that technique plays a big part.

John we are not selling used cars here, we are selling pool cues. Controlled experiments are just that CONTROLLED, and basically the statements made are hype and nothing else. Cues are tools no matter how they perform under controlled conditions, any machine used for the tests can not allow for the Human factor. In the end equipment is secondary to mechanics, and one's ability to use it.

I am sure that they do keep you in business with repairs. Cues are a collection of parts that don't want to be together, wood, plastic and steel. But since you don't actually know what adhesives are in use, (do you?) I think that you are not qualified to state categorically that Chinese cues are all made to lower quality standards. If so then the it's to the standards set by WELL KNOWN and HIGHLY REGARDED cue makers from the USA.

I don't need to know what Adhesives they use, and this go's for KAO KAO they don't hold well. I know for fact that Players, Lucasi, Falcon, Predator, and many others that are made at KAO KAO have problems with wraps coming loose, whatever, they are using doesn't dry, expose it to any heat and wala loose wrap. I also see but caps coming loose, Joint collars coming loose, ferrules coming loose, all do to adhesives that don't take heat well, not from other forms of damage. I also see Finishes that are not thick enough and that have not adhered because of improper preparation of the surface. Finishes that are not compatible with stains used for changing the color of woods. Predator is especially notorious for this problem, their lower end cues that are Black / Falk Ebony are actually Maple that has been colored and finished. The finish on these cues self destructs if it is chipped or nicked in any way, I could go on and on, however, I do not need to, enough people know exactly what I am talking about. In the end these things are not on Par with American Production cue makers and only the future will tell if they ever will be.

Rick got his first piece of stainless steel from me in 1991 when I was in Ft. Walton Beach (I mistakenly said Panama City earlier) visiting a friend. I had a hunk of stainless that was the jump handle of a jump cue I owned. I traded it to Rick for a rewrap on one of my cues.

John, Rick Howard starting making Jump Break cues in 1987 / 1988 time frame. He was the first Cue maker to Make a Jump Break cue that broke down into three pieces specifically for that purpose. Now, I do not know what Stainless Steel has to do with but, it was not for his Jump Break cues.

John, like I said above there is absolutely no reason to buy products that are over $100, especially cues from Overseas. America has the best product facilities and the most experienced people in the world, and their products show it day after day. Now I will concede that many American Production Cue Companies are having import cues made overseas, however, this doesn't effect their main lines of cues because of the price range that the imports are in (0 to $149).
I for one will continue to support American Companies so long as their products are equal or better than those imported, so in my opinion this will be far into the foreseeable future.

Take care John
 
Again as I stated, the best Chinese cue makers have been trained by some of the best American cue makers. In an independent and unbiased test an independent labratory would find the cues made by the top Chinese makers and those made by American production facilities to be virtually identical.

This is not a debate about the socioeconomics of purchasing goods made in xxx - the fact is that when you purchase almost anything these days then it is a global product by virtue of it's components.

This is purely a discussion on quality and I contend that the quality is on par with anything made in the USA in a production environment.

Unfortunately this will never be more than a yes it is/no it isn't debate because there is no INDEPENDENT body who tests cues to determine their quality and then reports on them like Consumer Reports does.

I would WELCOME such a body with open arms and happily send product to them for testing.

I find it funny that you have all these problems with import cues but the VAST MAJORITY of people who own them don't have those problems.

I can't speak for Players and Lucasi but I can speak for Predator and Fury. At Sterling we see a tiny fraction of returns and issues with Fury cues compared to the volume we sell. Less than 3% of total Fury cues sold are returned for any kind of issues. 100% of cues returned are either repaired or replaced to the customer's satisfaction.

When we sold Predator the incidence of issues with Predator cues was very small compared to the volume of cues we sold.

What are these adhesives that you are referring to on the wrap that you say that Kao Kao is not using? Name it and I will go to Kao Kao and film how they wrap cues and bet you that they are using the same name brand or exactly the same composition.

I have been selling Chinese cues for five years now with Sterling and for 10 years prior to that among the many cues we sold which included most from the USA makers. I have seen the cues evolve from barely adequate to damn good in that fifteen years.

You can knock them all you want to but you can't stop progress. Again, the cues that Kao Kao makes are state of the art and they use all the best practices as taught to them by the American Cuemakers.

My story about trading Rick some stainless was only mean to illustrate that I am familiar with Rick and his work. It has nothing to do with the quality of his jump break cues. I was not aware that Rick Howard was the first person to make a three piece cue specifically for jumping and breaking - I thought that was Huebler. But back in 87 I was just out of high school and more concerned with playing pool than who made my cue.

As for the testing Craig, controlled experiements are responsible for EVERY advance in technology and medicine and bitech and well just about everything. Testing in a controlled environment means that you can MEASURE performance and set benchmarks.

It's all well and good to say that x-brand is the best but until you can PROVE it your contention is just as much "hype" as the next person who contends that theirs is the "best".

My contention is that yours isn't better and for $180 that makes the Fury a better bargain for the consumer. I am willing to prove it or get my ass handed to me trying.

As far as the jump cue game goes there are few in the world who have been into it as deeply as I have. And I certain that the number of people who have done jump shot exhibitions and clinics as much as I have is less than ten worldwide. So I will leave it up to you, figure out a way to test the cues and if the Mace outperforms the Fury I will publicly admit it.
 
" I agree that they will be equal some day to the top tear productions cues made in the USA."

Hope you're not comparing apple to orange.....if you exclude schon cues...which is a production - custom shop cue... IMHO...I think production cues made in China have already exceed the quality in the US.. are there really any production cue left in US?

Take falcon & predators made in china as an example of their quality...no complain from anyone that I know....I would think these quality is almost just as good as schon but that won't be a fair comparison as you have to look at how many cue they are making compared to schon. Love those schon cues!!

Regards,
Duc.
 
Back
Top