Yes, no, maybe so? If so, what say you?
Yes, no, maybe so? If so, what say you?
Yes, no, maybe so? If so, what say you?
Could it also mean that he/she is a new maker and starting out?
Just throwing it out there. Since a question like that could be be open ended. Now if its a TS or a SW then there is a issue, but those never make mistakes like that.
Could be a up and comer, and not quite there yet but it may still play exceptional, could have been a one off mess up. To many unknowns to really answer that I would think.
But overall yes it says something, what exactly would depend on the maker/situation etc...
just my 0.0002 (damn economy)
You people are to funny. You seem to believe that a slight cosmetic defect, which has no affect what so ever on the playability of a cue determines if a cue maker is a great builder or a hack. Many things can cause the points to be a little different lengths. I've refinished hundreds of cues, many of which from top cue makers and you would be shocked at how many have uneven points once the pencil marks are removed.
Dick
Yes, no, maybe so? If so, what say you?
You people are to funny. You seem to believe that a slight cosmetic defect, which has no affect what so ever on the playability of a cue determines if a cue maker is a great builder or a hack. Many things can cause the points to be a little different lengths. I've refinished hundreds of cues, many of which from top cue makers and you would be shocked at how many have uneven points once the pencil marks are removed.
Dick
You people are to funny. You seem to believe that a slight cosmetic defect, which has no affect what so ever on the playability of a cue determines if a cue maker is a great builder or a hack. Many things can cause the points to be a little different lengths. I've refinished hundreds of cues, many of which from top cue makers and you would be shocked at how many have uneven points once the pencil marks are removed.
Dick
I have heard people say uneven points or a sugar line in the shaft down near the joint would distract them from their play. My thinking is that anyone that is looking down there while shooting can't play all that great in the first place and a cue like that is the perfect cue for them, because they would always have the cue to blame for missing.Dick I totally agree with You here, If I started naming off some of the names I've seen with uneven points, I think a few people here would be shocked to the point they May not even believe Me. As bad As I would like to mention them to prove My point, out of respect I'm not gonna do It, but believe me It's tempting when I read This Thread.
Does It effect Playability? IMHO uneven points are mostly cosmetic, and it takes more then That. I have shot with some of the cues I have in Mind, and believe me it had no effect on how well they played. In fact some played so well, that I understood why the maker had made such a big name for Their self. Of coarse You see this more often in bar conversions or SP's, but It still proves the point that playability was not effected. JMHO
Greg
I have heard people say uneven points or a sugar line in the shaft down near the joint would distract them from their play. My thinking is that anyone that is looking down there while shooting can't play all that great in the first place and a cue like that is the perfect cue for them, because they would always have the cue to blame for missing.
I have heard people say uneven points or a sugar line in the shaft down near the joint would distract them from their play. My thinking is that anyone that is looking down there while shooting can't play all that great in the first place and a cue like that is the perfect cue for them, because they would always have the cue to blame for missing.