This is all I have to say.

I think this post sums it up perfectly!

Agree or disagree with Grady - many of you are missing the point. Someone with multiple world championships (at any game) shouldn't worry about an invite ever. Whether or not he can win, the crowd loves to watch older legends get into the pit with younger competition. We got to see a little of it in the IPT - and we loved it.

The argument of "a younger player should get that spot who has a chance to win" is ridiculous - just create more spots. I think if you're a former world champion at any game - you have a chance to win. You might be a huge underdog, but you have a prayer. If you were looking to bet on Watson a week ago, what do you think you could have pulled-in as far as odds go?!?

Our sport doesn't do a good job in paying homage to our great players. When the Masters lets Nicklaus, Player, and Palmer tee off in the first grouping----- does ANYONE HERE ON AZB THINK THOSE OLD F's HAVE A PRAYER TO WIN!??!??? ANYONE? It's not the point. It's respect for the game and respect for the legends. How big do you think the galleries are around those guys who have no shot to win? I went to the Masters one year and let me tell you---- you can't get close to them and everyone watched them hack up the course and stood in awe with love and admiration.

Would'ves and Could'ves don't really matter--- it's WHAT IS that counts. It's sad to see Grady get on here and post how he should be able to play. If pool was more organized like golf, he probably would be able to play. Let's face it, the pool industry is a cannabalistic, siloed, insular and backward/sideways-looking sector. If pool were innovative, the organizing bodies would pull off IPT-like events that allowed any HOFer automatic/free entry, legend $$$ players CHEAP entry and seed all of them against the normal modern players. Imagine how marketable the videos would be?

Instead, pool is on the verge with tournaments going away, pool halls disappearing and few younger players getting involved. We need guys like Grady, McCready, Varner, Hopkins, Hall, and all the other geriatric players who I'd rather watch than any younger guy. Tournaments are BORING without them - plain and simple. Whoever manages the world 14.1 is eating their young by being dicks and not allowing former world champions, legends, HOFers, and the likes to play.

Keep b1tching Grady---- eventually some business neophyte at the world 14.1 office and get a bright idea to incorporate what I just posted. When it does happen, it's likely because you b1tched and opened up their blind eyes.

P.S.

Gee, if I recall, the last time I went to the Derby I watched Grady take Efren to the hill at some bank pool. Imagine that?
 
Grady,

You know I respect you, and wish you only the best.

However, I cannot understand your propensity to beg for inclusion into these various "Pro events". I could not, and would not, do that. It should be beneath YOU to do that..."period"

Even Watson, with all his nine major victorys, was, at age 59, in his last year of elgiblity for the British Open, and he was a 4 time winner of that most prestigious event.

I know all of us "old guy's" were praying for a miracle, but it was not to be. he came close, but bottom line...he embarassed himself, in the play-off with a younger Stewart Cink. Much the way it would be if you (or I ) played Scott Frost.

It is a bitter pill to swallow, and I would like to say (being quite a bit older than you) it is not easy to swallow.

You have made your mark on our somewhat 'limited inside exposure" pool world.

Take what you have earned, which is plenty....and don't beg for more. JMHO

Dick

Ps If you don't lighten up, you may be included in the Beards.., "Slate Head" group. Artie and I are charter members...;)
 
Last edited:
Funny thing is I don't really see where Grady has begged for anything other than a reasonable explanation as to why he was not given an invite....actually can't find where he even said he would accept but the general consensus was a desire to have someone explain why a player of his caliber and experience would not be invited

Doesn't seem to be asking for much...and obviously its something he has asked for before and not received so seems to be a "hey once again wanna give me an answer " and its ignored....

yeah I'm biased...so be it


R
 
Funny thing is I don't really see where Grady has begged for anything other than a reasonable explanation as to why he was not given an invite....actually can't find where he even said he would accept but the general consensus was a desire to have someone explain why a player of his caliber and experience would not be invited

Doesn't seem to be asking for much...and obviously its something he has asked for before and not received so seems to be a "hey once again wanna give me an answer " and its ignored....

yeah I'm biased...so be it


R

Excellent response Shellhouse...but did you bother to read post # 63 ?
 
The bottom line is that whomever is putting on the tourney and is putting up the money to do so can invite whoever the hell they want to. If my money is being used to put a tourney on, and I don't like someone or someone is saying things against me or my promoters or tour then you can bet your sweet ass that I'm not gonna invite that person.

Now, if a certain standard of rules for qualification exist then they should follow those rules, but if invitees are allowed then its up to the money involved to decide who gets invites. It's akin to golf tourney's inviting Michelle Wie, John Daly, Eric Compton, etc... when other golfers deserve the sponsors exemptions due to playing ability, merit, etc..

Also, if someone doesn't want me playing in their tourney for whatever reason, then I would say f@#k them and damn sure not want to play.

That tournament is owned and conducted by private individuals.They have right to decide whom they want to invite.They are not bound by any rules created by others and they will have their own rules.If it were a professional organization and if Grady belonged to that organization and if he was placed high in the anual rankings he then may be able to question their decision.But that tournament is owned by private individuals.

The reasoning mentioned above is exactly what is WRONG with the game of professional pool!

No set rules, no governing body that matters, no structure, everybody makes up their own rules, and on and on.

This is supposed to be a "World Open". That's why the comparisons to a golf "major" were made. Golf's majors don't get to make up their own rules - they don't get to invite "whoever the hell they want" and exclude same. They have a strictly adhered to set of rules regarding who gets exemptions (you would call invitations) and all others have to qualify in some way.
One of the great things is that exemptions are given to past champions.
There's no reason pool tournaments that wish to be thought of as "majors" shouldn't be held to, and shouldn't hold themselves to, a higher standard than a Sharpshooter's Lounge monthly nine ball tournament.
 
Excellent response Shellhouse...but did you bother to read post # 63 ?

Sure thought I had...

" However, I cannot understand your propensity to beg for inclusion into these various "Pro events"."


Maybe I misread/misunderstood....its happened before...


R
 
The reasoning mentioned above is exactly what is WRONG with the game of professional pool!

No set rules, no governing body that matters, no structure, everybody makes up their own rules, and on and on.

This is supposed to be a "World Open". That's why the comparisons to a golf "major" were made. Golf's majors don't get to make up their own rules - they don't get to invite "whoever the hell they want" and exclude same. They have a strictly adhered to set of rules regarding who gets exemptions (you would call invitations) and all others have to qualify in some way.
One of the great things is that exemptions are given to past champions.
There's no reason pool tournaments that wish to be thought of as "majors" shouldn't be held to, and shouldn't hold themselves to, a higher standard than a Sharpshooter's Lounge monthly nine ball tournament.

your reasoning is sound and it would be great for pool majors to be like golf, but there is no chance in hell that will happen because the sponsorship money is not there. The sponsorship money in major professional golf goes into the tens of millions for each tourney. Try getting that for a pool tourney.
 
The bottom line is that whomever is putting on the tourney and is putting up the money to do so can invite whoever the hell they want to. If my money is being used to put a tourney on, and I don't like someone or someone is saying things against me or my promoters or tour then you can bet your sweet ass that I'm not gonna invite that person.

I can't stand Charlie Williams and I think he's a first class *****/pervert, etc.., but it's his promoters, tour, etc.. and he can invite or not invite whomever he choses, and rightfully so.

Now, if a certain standard of rules for qualification exist then they should follow those rules, but if invitees are allowed then its up to the money involved to decide who gets invites. It's akin to golf tourney's inviting Michelle Wie, John Daly, Eric Compton, etc... when other golfers deserve the sponsors exemptions due to playing ability, merit, etc..

Also, if someone doesn't want me playing in their tourney for whatever reason, then I would say f@#k them and damn sure not want to play.


So this is a Charlie Williams tournament? That explains a lot. I think Grady needs counseling or something about his feud with Charlie Williams.

I agree that Grady and other past champions should be given an exemption as long as there is a large enough field, but why would Charlie give Grady an exemption to play in his tournament after all the stuff about Charlie that has been stirred up?

Is this about Grady getting into a tournament or just a continuation of Grady's running feud with Charlie?

This is soap opera material.
 
I actually won two 14.1 tournaments, one was one of Frank Zummo's events in Cleveland, the other the New England Straight Pool Championship.
The latter had Nicky Vhalos, Larry Liscotti, Ray Martin, Boston Shorty and some other very good players. The former, while it was not a big field, starred Alan Hopkins, Irving Crane, I think Diliberto was in it and Frank himself was a 100 ball runner
Then, of course, my third place finish in the World Straight Pool tournament in NYC in 1983 I'm very proud of. Two of the men I was lucky enough to defeat were Mike Sigel and Irving Crane.
Listen, respected posters, this is the best thing that could ever happen to me. Just forget about I may think I deserve, like an invitation. I'll just freely admit that I shouldn't get one. Further I'm sorry for suggesting such a bold and selfish thing.
Only, puleeeeze if you insist on posting negative things about me and my career, GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT.
Thank you,
Grady
Grady, I would like to get my "facts straight". Where should I go to get the proper information? When I was looking for a list of your titles, I checked several sites, including your own, and the only list I found was the one I posted. Now, in an earlier post, Harold offered to update the information on the web to include all of your titles and you, yourself, told him you would think about it. If you want people to get the correct information, the least you can do is make it available.

Concerning the two straight pool titles you mentioned, when were they? You don't say what year they were played. Considering the player names you mentioned, I have to assume these tournaments were many years ago. I think it was great that you won those tournaments, but they do not qualify you for a tournament today.

You also mention a third place finish in a world championship in 1983. Again, you should be proud of that. However, that was 26 years ago. It has no bearing on today.

There are many other players, including some HOF straight pool players, who are not invited. I think they should all be invited before you Grady.
 
Respect is not an entitlement in America, unfortunately.

That, and the Billiards powers that be have always operated under their own agenda. You know that, Grady.

F them MFers.
 
Who ??? wouldn't watch Efren ,and Grady play one -hple

All I will say in his defense at the derby city classic (07). One of the matches that drew a crowd was Efren Reyes,and Grady- It had plenty of spectators.(A FEW Hundred). Grady comes to win just like other pool players-how is a guy supposed to stay( sharp) in comp-when not invited- Who's next Kim, Johnny and Earl- Far as I remember Grady bank rolls himself.
 
Agree or disagree with Grady - many of you are missing the point. Someone with multiple world championships (at any game) shouldn't worry about an invite ever. Whether or not he can win, the crowd loves to watch older legends get into the pit with younger competition. We got to see a little of it in the IPT - and we loved it.

The argument of "a younger player should get that spot who has a chance to win" is ridiculous - just create more spots. I think if you're a former world champion at any game - you have a chance to win. You might be a huge underdog, but you have a prayer. If you were looking to bet on Watson a week ago, what do you think you could have pulled-in as far as odds go?!?

Our sport doesn't do a good job in paying homage to our great players. When the Masters lets Nicklaus, Player, and Palmer tee off in the first grouping----- does ANYONE HERE ON AZB THINK THOSE OLD F's HAVE A PRAYER TO WIN!??!??? ANYONE? It's not the point. It's respect for the game and respect for the legends. How big do you think the galleries are around those guys who have no shot to win? I went to the Masters one year and let me tell you---- you can't get close to them and everyone watched them hack up the course and stood in awe with love and admiration.

Would'ves and Could'ves don't really matter--- it's WHAT IS that counts. It's sad to see Grady get on here and post how he should be able to play. If pool was more organized like golf, he probably would be able to play. Let's face it, the pool industry is a cannabalistic, siloed, insular and backward/sideways-looking sector. If pool were innovative, the organizing bodies would pull off IPT-like events that allowed any HOFer automatic/free entry, legend $$$ players CHEAP entry and seed all of them against the normal modern players. Imagine how marketable the videos would be?

Instead, pool is on the verge with tournaments going away, pool halls disappearing and few younger players getting involved. We need guys like Grady, McCready, Varner, Hopkins, Hall, and all the other geriatric players who I'd rather watch than any younger guy. Tournaments are BORING without them - plain and simple. Whoever manages the world 14.1 is eating their young by being dicks and not allowing former world champions, legends, HOFers, and the likes to play.

Keep b1tching Grady---- eventually some business neophyte at the world 14.1 office and get a bright idea to incorporate what I just posted. When it does happen, it's likely because you b1tched and opened up their blind eyes.

P.S.

Gee, if I recall, the last time I went to the Derby I watched Grady take Efren to the hill at some bank pool. Imagine that?


Tap tap. I'm with you 100%, Spidey.
 
Last edited:
So this is a Charlie Williams tournament? That explains a lot. I think Grady needs counseling or something about his feud with Charlie Williams.

I agree that Grady and other past champions should be given an exemption as long as there is a large enough field, but why would Charlie give Grady an exemption to play in his tournament after all the stuff about Charlie that has been stirred up?

Is this about Grady getting into a tournament or just a continuation of Grady's running feud with Charlie?

This is soap opera material.

That was my question a couple of pages ago, and it still hasnt been addressed.
 
on the tom watson subject, i would not be proud if i was him, but that is just me. maybe that i did play well through the event, but i have never seen anybody hit a putt as badly, and with less chance to go in as the 18th hole putt to win it. i mean that was a full fledged like triple choke. that would have been like missing a hill hill 9 ball by 1 diamond.

look, about this other crap, of course grady should be allowed to play. the problem is this sport sucks, and all the promoters and tournaments are bs and there is way too much politics involved. i am thoroughly convinced charlie williams has some major issues by the way, but that is neither here nor there. it is just total bs and people like grady receive the brunt of it, so like it or not grady is right on this one. he may not have a great chance to win, but he should be able to play if he would like to.
 
Last edited:
on the tom watson subject, i would not be proud if i was him. maybe that i did play well through the event, but i have never seen anybody hit a putt as badly, and with less chance to go in as the 18th hole putt to win it. i mean that was a full fledged like triple choke. that would have been like missing a hill hill 9 ball by 1 diamond.

lol, have you ever played golf? If you have, have you ever had a putt on 18 for a few hundred dollars? How about for a few thousand?

Now multiply that by a factor of about a million, not monetary wise, the putt only meant an extra 500,000 or so, but pressure wise. Couple that with the fact that the man will be 60 in a few months.
 
lol, have you ever played golf? If you have, have you ever had a putt on 18 for a few hundred dollars? How about for a few thousand?

Now multiply that by a factor of about a million, not monetary wise, the putt only meant an extra 500,000 or so, but pressure wise. Couple that with the fact that the man will be 60 in a few months.

Vette, apparently you don't know enzo very well....

He has never missed a ball in his life...in ANY sport. He bats .900, shoots 50 under par, and is the only living player to ever shoot above 1.000 on the TPA score....and he's a great instructor. ;)
 
Here we go again!!! you are in your golden years and you need to learn to live the rest of your life with pride & dignity.If u keep coming up with this kind of drama on and off on AZB, there will always be some who will strip u of that pride and dignity. Do you like to hear some one on this board remind you that you are old and can`t play a lick and hence you are not invited? your time was over long time ago.Just take care of your pool hall business.:cool:

Sounds like Vagabond is missing his respect button! Grady Matthews is a legend of the game. He has put more into pool than just about anyone, not to mention he is a top straight pool player that is capable of beating anyone at any givin time. To not get an invite into this event is a slap in the face to a great ambassador of this great game we call pool. His age shouldn't be a factor. He's obviously no dummy and if he felt he couldn't be a factor in competing knowing Grady, he would have no comment.
 
Sounds like Vagabond is missing his respect button! Grady Matthews is a legend of the game. He has put more into pool than just about anyone, not to mention he is a top straight pool player that is capable of beating anyone at any givin time. To not get an invite into this event is a slap in the face to a great ambassador of this great game we call pool. His age shouldn't be a factor. He's obviously no dummy and if he felt he couldn't be a factor in competing knowing Grady, he would have no comment.

Whats up Mark? Haven't seen you around for a while......

I'm in the same camp as Vagabond but I think what you and several others are missing is that Grady has went on this same triade every year since the first invite he didn't get from Charlie. I myself think the invite may have been overlooked the first year (or maybe there was bad blood before) and instead of quietly pushing some buttons to get an invite the second year Grady went completely off the air here (or maybe RSB on usenet) and made such a big deal of it that it killed EVER getting one..... Been doing it every year since..... Who wants invite someone that hates them and has been so negative publicly about their tournament? No one! I'll say it one more time. Grady needs to preserve his legacy, teach and promote. The title "The Professor" ain't no BS, the pool world has much to be learned from him and I would much rather see the "good ole Grady" instead of the "bitter" one.
 
Last edited:
lol, have you ever played golf? If you have, have you ever had a putt on 18 for a few hundred dollars? How about for a few thousand?

Now multiply that by a factor of about a million, not monetary wise, the putt only meant an extra 500,000 or so, but pressure wise. Couple that with the fact that the man will be 60 in a few months.

A choke is a choke....and Tom Watson choked. You can throw the money outta of the window in this situation - I doubt he was worried about putting food on the table for his family. C'mon now, the guy's a multi-millionaire!

Having said that, I still feel for the guy. I was rooting for him because he was the underdog and a class act! He showed tons of heart, and I was disappointed to see him fall short.

I'm just saying, money wasn't a factor in his half stroke choke.
 
Back
Top