Okay, someone send me a complimentary cnc machine so I can test these theories

I agree that we should use the right tool. But how accurate does it have to be? Is .0003" vs .001" a big enough deal to spend $7000 on a spindle like one cuemaker I know did, when a $100 laminate trimmer only runs out .0007" more?Using the right tool for the job is what's at issue here. You shouldn't use any router for precision inlay work, they weren't made for that. Nor would you use an ultra accurate spindle to cut v-grooves.
I agree that we should use the right tool. But how accurate does it have to be? Is .0003" vs .001" a big enough deal to spend $7000 on a spindle like one cuemaker I know did, when a $100 laminate trimmer only runs out .0007" more?
Very good points. We use .020" bits as our smallest bit and then knife in the corners instead of cutting little outer radiuses with small bits. It takes more hand work that way, but gives perfectly sharp corners. I have not tried the .010" bits. But I must admit that on the Ivory Scepter cue we broke about 20 of the .020" bits. That was alot of $$ lost in bits. So a expensive spindle might pay for itself in time with less broken bits. I considered using the Wolfgang spindles on my inlay machines, but he always made one at a time and they were usually different and he could not keep the same motor all the time, so unless he could make it the same every time I could not use them on the inlay machines I build. Maybe I should try one on my personal machine.Here's another reason. Unless you want to use gigantic cutters all the time, you need higher rpms and less runout than the routers provide. You cannot use a .010" cutter in the Kress or PC Router without breaking lots of bits.
According to the ad on the Wolfgang spindle, you can use .005" cutters. I cannot with mine. I use .010's regularly though.
I want to be able to use some smaller cutters for some things. I want all my parts and pockets perfect, not just close. For that reason, I'll be spending thousands on a spindle for my new machine. There's obviously more to the machine than just the spindle, but the machine is only as good as it's weakest part.
Here's another reason. Unless you want to use gigantic cutters all the time, you need higher rpms and less runout than the routers provide. You cannot use a .010" cutter in the Kress or PC Router without breaking lots of bits.
According to the ad on the Wolfgang spindle, you can use .005" cutters. I cannot with mine. I use .010's regularly though.
I want to be able to use some smaller cutters for some things. I want all my parts and pockets perfect, not just close. For that reason, I'll be spending thousands on a spindle for my new machine. There's obviously more to the machine than just the spindle, but the machine is only as good as it's weakest part.
I will have to agree with Tony here also. I upgraded my cnc to a Wolfgang as well. Really helped in the accuracy of the machine. I was using a Dremel as my spindle and was breaking bits regularly.
Just to much play in the Dremel. As stated, they are ok with larger bits, but once you go below .032 , you are at risk for snapping them.
I would recommend the Wolfgang for it's accuracy. It is very nice to cut the pocket, then the part, and have then fit very nicely.
I hand built my machine as stated, so it is all a learning curve and test trial. But I have finally found the set up with the Wolfgang Spindle I am very happy with. Plus the new Wolfgang Spindles have a double pulley system that I really like. I feel even on the pre made machines like the Storrn, Breeze, Taig mills, this spindle for the price range, is well worth the money to upgrade them.
Just my 2 cents and experience.
for cnc-cuemakers:
what resolution has your cnc machine?
It is SOLD!i have one of these for sale,with back up computer and lots of bigtime software for $5000.it is perfect for all inlays and incredibly accurate.you would need an extra spindle for tapering though.
Provided that machine really has zero backlash I would say it would be the better way to go than the Taig. But it probably won't cut metal parts as good as the Taig. You are still going to have to buy software to run it. So I still think for a couple thousand dollars more a Donald Bludworth machine would be a better bet. I am told a machine like I bought from Mason would cost $8500 brand new and has the software and some training included.Would this be a good starter machine, or would a taig based unit be a better choice for a beginner?
http://cgi.ebay.com/Pool-Cue-CNC-machine-router-mill-inlay-cnc-router_W0QQitemZ170394333386QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item27ac4b30ca
That is what I figured would be the case, that is why I was pointing Max toward a Bludworth.I seriously doubt that machine has 0 backlash. I am buying a similar machine from them and I am paying a lot of extra money to achieve almost 0 backlash. The machine I'm getting is more than double the cost of that and then I still have to buy the spindle.
However, I would bet that this is going to be better for you than the Taig in the long run and will be easier to upgrade down the road. Keep in mind, if you buy one of their machines off Ebay, they are basically sold as is and you are going to get almost no help from them if you have problems with it (Even if that's not what they tell you).
I seriously doubt that machine has 0 backlash. I am buying a similar machine from them and I am paying a lot of extra money to achieve almost 0 backlash. The machine I'm getting is more than double the cost of that and then I still have to buy the spindle.
However, I would bet that this is going to be better for you than the Taig in the long run and will be easier to upgrade down the road. Keep in mind, if you buy one of their machines off Ebay, they are basically sold as is and you are going to get almost no help from them if you have problems with it (Even if that's not what they tell you).