What kind of machine would it take to turn 5 butts at a time?
Just why would you want to turn 5 butts at a time? Turning the butts is a relatively easy task and the thing that comes to my mind is how am I going to find time to finish 5 butts at once? Leonard has been pitching these machines to me for years but I never saw any advantage to turning multiple butts at once, unless you're trying to compete with Viking or the imports and that's stupid!
just more hot air!
Sherm
I'm just trying to find out what equipment is available to turn multiple pieces of wood at one time. Not necessarily Butts.. I failed to mention
the contour. So its not just a straight taper.
Just why would you want to turn 5 butts at a time? Turning the butts is a relatively easy task and the thing that comes to my mind is how am I going to find time to finish 5 butts at once? Leonard has been pitching these machines to me for years but I never saw any advantage to turning multiple butts at once, unless you're trying to compete with Viking or the imports and that's stupid!
just more hot air!
Sherm
I always thought the same thing. 99% of the cuemakers out there aren't going to benefit from such a machine.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Pool-Cue-CNC-ma...emQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item27ac206756
There's one to consider.
It only takes about 2 minutes to cut a shaft or butt.
If that's too long, you can mill some parts and turn more at the same time.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Pool-Cue-CNC-ma...emQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item27ac206756
There's one to consider.
It only takes about 2 minutes to cut a shaft or butt.
If that's too long, you can mill some parts and turn more at the same time.
Boy the prices just keep coming down. That looks like one of the best buys yet. Couple of things I'm not real crazy about. The Thompson type linear bearings and shafts have never appealed to me. I've bought a few smaller assembles on e-bay and their clearances just weren't as tight as I would want. I've bought a number of the double bearing blocks also which had just to much clearances. This may just be my bad luck in maybe getting worn out parts in every instance but that's my experience with them. I've never had any problems buying linear bearing trucks and rails with no problems.Next is the Kirk anti-backlash nuts. I've used these before and they worked well but being plastic I don't look for them to wear well long. Bob Griffen of Madison Bob cues had an Alignright that he crashed one night and stripped the threads off of the nuts. You aren't supposed to crash but things happen sometimes. I just like real ball screw assemblies.
These are just my opinions from my experiences and I could be wrong but there it is. This looks like one of the best buys I've seen but without hands on experience, who knows? I've recommended a couple of other cue repair lathes to people after watching demonstrations at trade shows and later when using them myself I was very disappointed in my recommendations.
Dick
I disagree a little. Although it is way, way overkill for a hobbiest cue maker, one can be a great time saver for someone who builds a number of cues and shafts a year. I make 9 turns per shaft and about 6 per butt. If you turn a couple hundred shafts a year plus 50 to a hundred butts, that means a lot of time sitting watching expensive wood turn into cheap shavings. The same machine is used for all of these mundane tasks.
It is true that it is a very hard to get all of the stations to run exactly the same. Royce Bunnell was telling me how much trouble they went through setting up and maintaining their multiple shaft machine which I already was aware of. However, for a smaller, busy cue maker like myself, this is not a problem. I would use all of the stations making the incremental passes for both shafts and butts but just use one station that is trued correctly for the final pass. In that way it is easy for all of the non critical passes can be done in a very timely manner but the final, critical pass or passes can be done in the normal way. Of coarse this wouldn't be cost efficient for a hobbiest as they don't have the numbers to work with. Just my opinion.
Dick
I suppose if you had a manual (non cnc) machine you'd have to sit and watch it. However I was referring to having a cnc machine that you can cycle and work on other things while it's running. Most cuemakers don't put out the numbers to warrant a multiple place unit, even full timers. JMHO.
I suppose if you had a manual (non cnc) machine you'd have to sit and watch it. However I was referring to having a cnc machine that you can cycle and work on other things while it's running. Most cuemakers don't put out the numbers to warrant a multiple place unit, even full timers. JMHO.
We're getting spoiled. :grin:
It used to take my manual lightweight taper 10-12 minutes per shaft to cut .025 cleanly.
CNC does it a 5th of that easily.
I disagree a little. Although it is way, way overkill for a hobbiest cue maker, one can be a great time saver for someone who builds a number of cues and shafts a year. I make 9 turns per shaft and about 6 per butt. If you turn a couple hundred shafts a year plus 50 to a hundred butts, that means a lot of time sitting watching expensive wood turn into cheap shavings. The same machine is used for all of these mundane tasks.
It is true that it is a very hard to get all of the stations to run exactly the same. Royce Bunnell was telling me how much trouble they went through setting up and maintaining their multiple shaft machine which I already was aware of. However, for a smaller, busy cue maker like myself, this is not a problem. I would use all of the stations making the incremental passes for both shafts and butts but just use one station that is trued correctly for the final pass. In that way it is easy for all of the non critical passes can be done in a very timely manner but the final, critical pass or passes can be done in the normal way. Of coarse this wouldn't be cost efficient for a hobbiest as they don't have the numbers to work with. Just my opinion.
Dick