...since it looks like the last thread was closed/locked or something
Well whaddya know, my ban was lifted early. Imagine that.
Now that I can finally make a post on this thing....I stand by every single word I said in that last thread. I said what I wanted to say with conviction and I'd say it to everyone's face if I could. I'm not a keyboard "player" like a few others on here. I'll leave it at that-- after 16 pages or so in the other thread--- we're beating a dead horse now.
In regards to qualifications to posters.... of course you have to play well to be somewhat qualified. To say that you don't is ludicrous. Why? Because there are just FAR too many super-intelligent pool players who DO play well. Why bother with those who don't. For some reason, there is a notion that good players are mindless ogres who don't understand the technical aspects of the game --- this couldn't be farther from the truth.
Great players have found ways to take a complicated game and make it simple. It's "novel" to debate some of the more exotic math and physics, but it doesn't apply to everyday playing. When you're playing, you perceive lines and feel speed. Thoughts more complicated than that are unnecessary. Like many others here, I know a lot about the technical aspects of pool as they help with foundation. Outside of basic technique, it often doesn't apply to execution.
Do you have to be a good player to be a great teacher? I think so. We can debate that all we want but it is what it is. Why? Because it's SO easy to be a good player (at least to be able to run a rack a bunch of times in a session) that there's no excuse to not be. If you can't, you haven't put in the time to get there. Once again, there are SO many good players who are SMART with pool (and can teach) -- why NOT get a lesson from them? The ones who argue the other direction prob can't play, right? I wouldn't get surgery done by someone who knew everything about the surgery but never cut into a body --- would you?
Before you comment about how David Leadbetter can't beat the guy he's teaching - you're right. However, guys like him aren't REALLY teaching - they're "suggesting" things to already-champion "gifted" players. It's not like Tiger goes to your local golf driving range for a lesson. Why not? That guy is likely smart with golf, right? Wrong. They're idiots in the grand scheme of things. Please don't think I'm knocking ANY instructor on here-- I'm not. I'm just talking in generalities. Like I said - there are just TOO MANY super-smart teachers who play great to pay attention to someone who doesn't. In business, I never shadowed someone who wasn't a multi-millionaire because if they were so smart themselves - they'd be one. Does that mean you can't learn something from a hack? Sure - Efren is quoted as learning from watching complete hacks. However, that's the exception not the rule.
Sorry for the tangent - let's get back on topic....
The internet is a grand thing. It allows the small to be big, the big to be small - and the cover to make it hard to tell the difference. In the end, on this site at least, it's all about knowledge and execution. Some can do one, some can do both, some don't have either. There might even be some who are impostors with one or both... the internet makes it tough to tell. Pay close attention to those who never post videos of themselves playing, ever, or show up to any events - ever. Guys who have screen-names implying they're pros or stars when they're likely not. Before you run to nuthug, make sure there are nuts to hug - catch my drift? It's the nutless that tend to defend each other and band together to form an attack because between 10 guys (literally) - they're hoping to send in one nut.
Good luck with that.
It's good to be back -
Spidey
Well whaddya know, my ban was lifted early. Imagine that.
Now that I can finally make a post on this thing....I stand by every single word I said in that last thread. I said what I wanted to say with conviction and I'd say it to everyone's face if I could. I'm not a keyboard "player" like a few others on here. I'll leave it at that-- after 16 pages or so in the other thread--- we're beating a dead horse now.
In regards to qualifications to posters.... of course you have to play well to be somewhat qualified. To say that you don't is ludicrous. Why? Because there are just FAR too many super-intelligent pool players who DO play well. Why bother with those who don't. For some reason, there is a notion that good players are mindless ogres who don't understand the technical aspects of the game --- this couldn't be farther from the truth.
Great players have found ways to take a complicated game and make it simple. It's "novel" to debate some of the more exotic math and physics, but it doesn't apply to everyday playing. When you're playing, you perceive lines and feel speed. Thoughts more complicated than that are unnecessary. Like many others here, I know a lot about the technical aspects of pool as they help with foundation. Outside of basic technique, it often doesn't apply to execution.
Do you have to be a good player to be a great teacher? I think so. We can debate that all we want but it is what it is. Why? Because it's SO easy to be a good player (at least to be able to run a rack a bunch of times in a session) that there's no excuse to not be. If you can't, you haven't put in the time to get there. Once again, there are SO many good players who are SMART with pool (and can teach) -- why NOT get a lesson from them? The ones who argue the other direction prob can't play, right? I wouldn't get surgery done by someone who knew everything about the surgery but never cut into a body --- would you?
Before you comment about how David Leadbetter can't beat the guy he's teaching - you're right. However, guys like him aren't REALLY teaching - they're "suggesting" things to already-champion "gifted" players. It's not like Tiger goes to your local golf driving range for a lesson. Why not? That guy is likely smart with golf, right? Wrong. They're idiots in the grand scheme of things. Please don't think I'm knocking ANY instructor on here-- I'm not. I'm just talking in generalities. Like I said - there are just TOO MANY super-smart teachers who play great to pay attention to someone who doesn't. In business, I never shadowed someone who wasn't a multi-millionaire because if they were so smart themselves - they'd be one. Does that mean you can't learn something from a hack? Sure - Efren is quoted as learning from watching complete hacks. However, that's the exception not the rule.
Sorry for the tangent - let's get back on topic....
The internet is a grand thing. It allows the small to be big, the big to be small - and the cover to make it hard to tell the difference. In the end, on this site at least, it's all about knowledge and execution. Some can do one, some can do both, some don't have either. There might even be some who are impostors with one or both... the internet makes it tough to tell. Pay close attention to those who never post videos of themselves playing, ever, or show up to any events - ever. Guys who have screen-names implying they're pros or stars when they're likely not. Before you run to nuthug, make sure there are nuts to hug - catch my drift? It's the nutless that tend to defend each other and band together to form an attack because between 10 guys (literally) - they're hoping to send in one nut.
Good luck with that.
It's good to be back -
Spidey
Last edited: