So, if you have 32 players, you have 16 first round matches....32 table hours(Thrs), then your second round A you have 8 matches...16 Thrs. And your second round B has 8 matches...16 Thrs. And the next round of B is another 8 matches ...16 Thrs. This adds up to 80 Thrs. So, if you have 8 tables, to get this far has taken 10 hours. you have had two half hour breaks...so 11 hours. if you have started at 10 am Saturday....you are now at 9pm. And have used 8 tables all day.
Now for next round of B, you have 4 matches(16Thrs) with 4 tables needed. And the A has 4 matches on 4 tables. So, you have used all 8 tables for 2 more hours to get here. it is now 11pm.
You have used 8 table from 10 am to 11pm. I dont know how big the halls would be, but if it doesn't have 16 plus tables, you are severely cutting intothe prime Saturday evening crowd. Anyway...
Sunday morning rolls around and you have to play still the semis and finals in A....and a round of 4 matches on B, as well as 2 rounds of 2 matches, and so on.
This is for 32 players with your format. I think this clearly shows that you do not understand the logistics or the business of pool. This is simply not a good venture. Can you imaginr the table and time requirements for a 64 player event?
The unfortunate thing is, many owners might actaully try this ridiculous plan. And then they would be turned off tournaments. I think you should stay out of pool promotion, you are bad for the game. An ignorant dreamer.
Some very successful pro-am tournaments are run with almost the exact time and room constraints you claim would not work. I have run and played in hundreds of these event in my playing career. Races to seven or nine can easily exceed an hour to 1.5 hrs. Even among top players. Many of these tournaments consume prime time [like saturday night and late into sunday] for the weekend they are scheduled. RKC's idea may not be fullproof for every dynamic, but it is an idea for hopes to improve the game. Do you think calling some one ridiculous, ignorant and bad for the game is a better way to go? Oh and next time you call someone ignorant you may not want to admit you had to look up the definition of the word. You confessed to being ignorant of the definition of ignorant. That is classic.
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
								
							
							 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		