So far I've only managed to plow through the first 52 pages, so if I've missed this discussion please forgive me.
So here's my question. I've seen a lot of discussion on geometry and getting to that geometrically correct contact point. However, as I think we all know, geometry isn't the whole story. You can get the geometry of the cut 100% correct, hit the OB directly on the contact point and still miss miserably because of collision induced throw, spin induced throw, skid, COF of the cloth, etc. In a word, physics.
I'm not making any claims to knowing the answer. I certainly do not. However it occurs to me that perhaps CTE is somehow taking portions of the physics into account without us knowing it.
What do you think?
James
I think that this is what's happening. I think that somehow using CTE blends the optics/perception and the geometry together to produce the aiming line. And yes, that sounds blasphemous, especially from a non-engineer, non-physicist.
The other option, that CTE is just an elaborate form of guessing where the aiming line is at is also possible.
Either way people are playing better pool as reported through their personal testimony. So until science puts robots and sensors, high-cameras, and PHDs on the case CTE will just be shrouded in mystery as to how it works.
No amount of "discussion" on this forum will clear it up. There will be no "aha moment" no burst of clarity where everyone agrees that THIS is how CTE works.
Someday soon however we will be a little closer as there is a DVD forthcoming where someone who knows how to teach it will show us all the "right" way to apply it and that hopefully will put a lot of us on the same page. At least then the instructions will be clear.