Actually the apps are pretty accurate IMHO. They won't be off by some huge amount. Radar guns are pretty finicky. I'm guessing the higher break speeds are going to be in the 35-40 mph range. I regularly clock in at about 17-18 mph with my player.![]()
I can't imagine a human being breaking harder than Jeff:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7ZwcqSSCr8&feature=related
I can't imagine a human being breaking harder than Jeff:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7ZwcqSSCr8&feature=related
Actually the apps are pretty accurate IMHO. They won't be off by some huge amount. Radar guns are pretty finicky. I'm guessing the higher break speeds are going to be in the 35-40 mph range. I regularly clock in at about 17-18 mph with my player.![]()
If you want proof, pm your phone number. I will send you a phone pic with the break speed app where I broke 31mph.
A record of 23-24 is ridiculous. I know many people who's regular break is above that without full effort.
In terms of true accuracy, I would pick a radar gun over a sound app if both were used properly. However, I think the sound app is easier to use for most people in a correct manner.
Just through personal experience, I've seen huge variances with people who use radar guns for measuring speed. My experience is not through pool, but with baseball pitching, so maybe this doesn't apply to pool as accurately. I've seen radar guns measuring baseball pitches fluctuate wildly, which makes me think the users of the radar guns either didn't know how to use them correctly or that they are hard to use properly.
In any case, I really do believe the sound apps are accurate as long as the measurement from the cueball to the rack is accurate. Obviously the speed of sound comes in to play as well, but a few millimeters won't make a huge difference.
Anyone know if they make that app for a Blackberry instead of the Droid and the iPhone ??
4. What you mentioned with inherent error in "placement of the cue ball" on the app, in preparation for the sound of the break itself, is huge. In the short distance on the table, a placement error of 1 inch can result in a significant discrepancy in the calculation of the speed.
-Sean
Break speed app results can be doctored so easy though.
Not saying you didnt do this, I'm not doubting you, but i can prolly give you a break speed result at 50mph.
Anyone know if they make that app for a Blackberry instead of the Droid and the iPhone ??
I can't imagine a human being breaking harder than Jeff:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7ZwcqSSCr8&feature=related
I used break speed pro in front of my speaker on that break and it came out 36.73 MPH for an oversized 8 table and 35.07 for an 8 foot. 40.07 MPH for a nine foot table which that doesn't look like to me but I could be wrong. Android users go ahead and try the same thing and see what results you get. My results were consistent within a tenth of a mile an hour no matter how many times I replayed it.
I don't study the break, nor do i practice it much - I'm too lazy, so just tend to leather the CB and hope for the best. I only get up to speeds around 22-23mph.
Anyway, Jeff has a break that seems weird to me and how I do it. Those slow mo shots are great for seeing what he actually does, the things not noticeable in real time. Firstly, the arm juts out to almost parallel after the back swing - it's almost like a tennis player hitting a forearm smash. It's like he's scooping the ball.
Secondly, there's virtually no follow through - when I break, the tip of my cue is practically on the spot, such is the extent of my follow through. Jeff's tip doesn't even go past the middle pocket, and practically stops forward motion after contacting the CB. His follow through is down rather than forward. I also don't get how you can hit the CB dead centre and end up bending the cue so much.
I can't imagine a human being breaking harder than Jeff:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7ZwcqSSCr8&feature=related