A long comment on "aiming systems" ...

Aiming system excuses:


1. The aiming system works perfect, I missed because I botched up my stroke.

A: Great, go work on your stroke which is now the most important thing, not your aiming system. The aiming system is perfect after all. You have been given the line. Done. On to other things.




2. The aiming system works perfect, but takes time to learn.

A: So much for being a short-cut.




3. The aiming system works perfect, I missed because I didn't use the aiming system correctly!

A: Well, that's acceptable, but no true system once learned should be prone to misuse. Misses ought to be extremely rare. Leading to world-class play. If not, the problem is probably stroke. See the answer to excuse #1, go work on your stroke.



4. The aiming system is perfect and produces the true line of aim, but only this little tiny part of it is "feel" and "judgment" ..

A: Then it is not a system that produces the true line of aim for you. You're doing it by feel and judgement.
 
Aiming system excuses:


1. The aiming system works perfect, I missed because I botched up my stroke.

A: Great, go work on your stroke which is now the most important thing, not your aiming system. The aiming system is perfect after all. You have been given the line. Done. On to other things.




2. The aiming system works perfect, but takes time to learn.

A: So much for being a short-cut.




3. The aiming system works perfect, I missed because I didn't use the aiming system correctly!

A: Well, that's acceptable, but no true system once learned should be prone to misuse. Misses ought to be extremely rare. Leading to world-class play. If not, the problem is probably stroke. See the answer to excuse #1, go work on your stroke.



4. The aiming system is perfect and produces the true line of aim, but only this little tiny part of it is "feel" and "judgment" ..

A: Then it is not a system that produces the true line of aim for you. You're doing it by feel and judgement.

You can be made to see what you want to see given time.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...69788799603527
 
dr dave should pay a professional to fix that disaster of a home made website he has that nobody can find anything on it unless he posts a direct link here.
I'm sorry my website organizational structure is not up to your standards. In case you don't know about it yet, the easiest way to find stuff on my website is to start here:

You can easily find resources from me and many others by clicking on the topic of interest. Most topics of interest are clearly listed (with sub topics) in alphabetical order.

That's where I usually go when somebody asks a question on a topic, and the answer and supporting resources are often there already. If not, I usually try to find and post answers with links to supporting resources. The links I post usually come directly from the FAQ page or one of the sub-topic resource pages.

Regards,
Dave
 
Thanks.

What is funny (or sad) is that many of the sentences are direct quotes or paraphrases from statements posted by "aiming system" proponents on pool Internet forums over the years.

I have never really had anything against aiming systems over the years, because many of them do offer realistic benefits. I just object to the way they are sometimes "marketed."

Regards,
Dave

My sentiments, exactly, Dave.

Roger
 
Now, it's time to for Duckie to get rid of the "down", and grow some feathers. Reach out and learn as much as you can. It will pay off down the road for you. Get out of the trench you are in, and you will find there's a whole big world out there for you to explore and learn from.

And just how should he go about that, Neil? By learning CTE? And where should he start? By buying a DVD? Or two? Or three? And what should he do if he can't grasp CTE from the DVDs? Take follow-up lessons? And from which CTE-qualified instructor should he take those lessons?

Duckie has already told you that he has his own method of aiming and that he's happy with it. Why can't you accept that?

More marketing.

Roger
 
So you are now going to resort to JB's tactics and make this a personal attack?

I've played pool for over 50 years and know the fundamentals like the back of my hand! IMO when to focus too much on aiming, as one must do in CTE you LOSE focus on the other fundamentals! Most new comers to this game will not spend "months" to learn a new system of aiming. Nor will I, since the system I use now has served me well for over 50 years! I will continue to teach the system that most pros use!

Randy,
You do know that CTE/Pro1 does NOT require "too much focus on aiming", don't you?

Once you learn the basics of the manual CTE/Pro1, and you move into Pro1 it becomes a completely automated manner of aiming and shooting. Do you not understand that?

If you don't understand that and see that, then you should continue to teach whatever aiming method that has served you for over 50 years.

If others are playing better because of CTE/Pro1, I would think you would want to learn how to use it effectively but it really doesn't matter. Go ahead and use whatever you choose. Just don't begrudge others who get it and choose to teach it or learn it. There are just too many people benefiting from CTE/Pro1 for it to not be at least as valuable as what you teach.

You won't get any argument from me, Stan or anyone else that uses CTE/Pro1, that fundamentals are a critical part of the game and that takes lots of time for your fundamentals to become flawless.

Personally, I believe that CTE/Pro1 is FAR superior to any other aiming system, primarily because it helps the player to develop a better sight picture. I mostly overlooked the CTE players from yesteryear because they didn't play shape too well and relied on a lot of instinctive aiming which isn't a bad thing but they were so caught up in the art of making balls with CTE (that's the old one taught by Hal Houle) that they failed to make advancements in other areas just as important. I figured that I could aim pretty well, hitting over a million balls and CTE was a cute and fun thing to learn but I thought that it wasn't going to make me a better player.

CTE/Pro1 has made me a better player, of that I am certain. The interesting thing is that CTE/Pro 1 helps a player in so many different areas, it is hard for me to understand why anyone would object to learning it and using it.

Contrary to what some (and maybe you too?,) want everyone to believe is that it can hurt your pool game. That is such a joke, I am shocked to hear people state this.

Anyway, I'm not much into arguing or debating and am just a struggling amateur player trying many different things to improve my game.

Again, personally speaking, I believe you are doing your students an injustice by dismissing CTE/Pro1 as a valuable teaching tool.

The bottom line is I don't have anything to gain from suggesting that people learn CTE/Pro1 and don't care if you approve of it or not. In fact I don't care if no one wants to learn it. I am positive that it has helped my game in more ways than one.

CTE/Pro1 may become the PRIMARY way to teach people how to aim correctly.
The ghost ball is imaginary and fractional aiming systems require too much guess work.

CTE/Pro1 can get the person to the correct aim line better than any other aiming system I have tried and I've tried a lot of them. :D

Most other "simple" aiming systems fall FAR SHORT of helping the player to get to the correct sight picture. CTE/Pro1 seems to do FAR MORE than any other aiming system.
 
I can't HELP it.

I know, in that satire, there have been people who said exactly those things. That's what makes it so funny, and crazy at the same time. Furthermore, I also stated I have nothing against aiming systems. I wrote a post saying how I would love for CTE to do what it claims to do. Wouldn't you? Wouldn't it be great for a geometrically sound aiming system to come forth, that utilizes more definitive lines of reference such as ball edges and centers and produces the correct line of aim for pocketing the ball?

It does.


I think so. That would be awesome. It would be the holy grail of aiming.

It would be. It might just be that. Maybe you should learn it and then give us a report.


But there are consequences to that. If that is achieved, then aiming is done. It is conquered. Follow the procedure, get the line of aim. Why do people struggle with it then? Even the biggest supporters and believers are constantly qualifying their statements by saying they work long and hard on it, and the skeptics don't want to put the "time in" ...

Because that is how it is. People who struggle with it don't have it down. That's where the work comes in, also called practice. However once you get it then you don't have to work on it any more. Unless you want to. Sometimes it opens up a whole other world of looking at how to "aim" and that in itself is fun to play with.


The proponents of CTE make claims, that if true, means that they ought to be done with the search for a line of aim, and now be onto perfecting their stroke. In effect, if CTE is what they say it is, CTE doesn't expand the study of aim and cause people to delve into a regimen of practicing it. It does the complete opposite. If it works, it brings an END to having to work on aiming. Thus, those people are now free and unburdened to work on other things, like stroke or mental game.

That's exactly the way it happens. Except for the proponents that already had a great stroke before switching to whatever system they use. It does bring an END to worrying about the shot line. Then the SHOOTER is free to focus on execution.


That's what I tried to get across to a certain somebody, but being that this logic tears apart their position, it just gets ignored.

If you mean me your logic doesn't tear apart anything. You claim that only hard work is what's needed and when someone comes with an aiming system and says flat out that it takes hard work to make it a fluid part of your game you say then that's not much of a system if it requires work to master it. Then you say that system users offer diet pills and down play hard work and get pissed off when you get the instructions and it says in the first line - "be prepared to work hard".

I have said a million times that using an aiming system has FREED me to work on other parts of my game. I have said that using an aiming system has allowed me to play better due to being able to focus on delivery. IGNORED...... personal testimony not allowed.

According to you I am delusional no matter what UNLESS I agree with you. Then I am rational.


Oh well...


What CTE users need is not geometry or mathematics, nor logic. What they need are psychologists. Psychologists to help them cope with the realities that Santa Clause isn't real, nor the Tooth Fairy. It is obvious that there is a strong, strong emotional attachment to CTE by system users. I described a likely reason why. Because of that euphoria and great pleasure derived from success or at least perceived success.

Um, the pool balls don't lie. When you line up on a shot either it goes or it doesn't. Any half decent player knows when they are making more balls or not. They know when they are making tougher shots or not. Maybe you should go into the TV Psychic Business with your willingness to act like you can judge a person's level of self-awareness through the internet.

The strong emotional attachment comes from actual success. Success as measured first by watching balls disappear and then by watching opponents quit and hand you money and finally by topping fields of players you couldn't beat before.


There is such a thing as non-chemical addiction. Habitual addiction. This has been documented as part of the placebo effect. If someone thinks something is helping them, they will fight tooth and nail for it. Regardless of whether it has real benefits or not. They will even argue that the false benefits tricks them into REAL benefits. This is lying to one's self, but some even say they don't care, only results on the table matter.

And apparently you are addicted to constantly tearing PEOPLE down for achieving what you with all your intellect refuse to learn in the real world. You SEEM to desperately want to achieve a moral victory over people who have real world results to stand on. For some reason you want to hold up your own failure to learn as a counterpoint to their success.

That's like saying the SAT test is invalid because you can't score high enough to get into a good college when other people manage just fine.

Personal testimony from those who are successful is not allowed because obviously it's all from delusional lunatics whereas personal testimony from those who didn't get it is from rational and logical people. That makes sense.......

This has been said in the CTE threads in round-about ways, and even overtly in the "Custom Cue Mythology" thread.

Your logic fails in both areas. As I said to you in the cue thread if you want to pick two pro players and bet super large and let me pick your guy's equipment then we can. We can let an independent lab verify that the equipment I choose for you meets the BCA specifications for a cue stick. I promise to bet as much as I can beg borrow and steal.


Trying to have a factual, logical, and civilized dialogue with superstitious addicts who appeal to the irrational is obviously very difficult. Perhaps futile.

And trying to have a discussion about HOW to use a particular system is very difficult when it's constantly polluted by people with a propensity to insult and injecting red-herring falsehoods. Thus you people have torn apart just about every thread on this forum for years because of it.

I have created ANOTHER safe haven to discuss this stuff on another forum: http://poolcuemarket.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18

In this forum section aiming will be discussed in terms of how to approach it without the arguing about which method is "better" and which methods really WORKS or not. I promise that flamers are not allowed. If you wan to come and discuss the method in terms of how you tried it and what you don't get then feel free. Any method presented that can't stand up to the ON TABLE scrutiny of the majority of people who try it will be discovered soon enough and that will serve as plenty of warning to all new players who happen to come across it and want to get a REAL review of it.

There will be none of this crappy theoretical nonsense, and make no mistake it IS nonsense from the opening post.

Either you try it or you don't. People who try it can criticize it and have their critique discussed and dissected. People who won't try it and just want to stir the crap will be asked to leave nicely. AZB desires to have long running threads and I assume that these will continue here. It's good for the advertisers to have threads like these.

But it's terrible for the participants. I know from experience that nearly everyone is cool in person. 99% of the insults that we sling would not cross our lips or enter our thoughts were we face to face in the pool room.

So the space I have created is NOT ad-supported and thus like any good poolroom civility will be enforced. Discourse is great. Dissection is great. Making a constantly stream of insults is not.

Stay here if you want to spend an endless amount of time in an endless ARGUMENT. Go to my forum if you want to discuss aiming in a space free of people who don't want you to discuss the actual methods.

I also do not expect to see many of you there and I expect it to be quiet. At their core on the net people love the drama. They relish the "fight" without immediate consequences. I seem to. But unlike bruises which heal the cutting remarks you make about me don't heal so easily, nor I am sure do the ones I make about you.

It is unbelievably NUTS that we are arguing about how to play pool. As if any of us have the right to argue about how to play pool.

Jesus it's just pool.

Don't you all LOVE to play it?

Why beat someone up over how they choose to play it then?
 
PS When I speak of civility in the pool room I mean we wouldn't be in knockdown fights like this over aiming. If anyone in the pool room said "my system rocks" and someone else said "your system sucks" then one or both of them would be saying BET and get your ass up on the table and prove it. There is plenty of incivility in the poolroom when it comes to barking and woofing but it usually ends up with two people playing pool unlike on here.

This is an endless ego-jerkoff festival with no one actually getting off. At least when you bet something someone goes home winner.
 
Randy,

CTE/Pro1 may become the PRIMARY way to teach people how to aim correctly.
The ghost ball is imaginary and fractional aiming systems require too much guess work.

CTE/Pro1 can get the person to the correct aim line better than any other aiming system I have tried and I've tried a lot of them. :D

Most other "simple" aiming systems fall FAR SHORT of helping the player to get to the correct sight picture. CTE/Pro1 seems to do FAR MORE than any other aiming system.



To assist with aiming, you should try Dave's Aiming Method (DAM) http://billiards.colostate.edu/threads/aiming.html#DAM

Originally Posted by PoolSharkAllen
Dave, Out of all the aiming systems that you've tried, which one(s) would you consider to be the best?

I personally use and prefer DAM (Dave's Aiming Method). Ignore the spoofy marketing intro at the beginning and jump to the useful advice section.

Briefly, DAM suggests using all visual information available to help see the required angle and the necessary line of aim for a shot. It also recommends a purposeful and consistent pre-shot routine, with the vision center aligned directly over the aiming line for every shot, regardless of cut direction. Quiet eyes, both in the set position and during the final forward stroke, are also an important part of DAM. See the useful advice link for a more complete description with lots of supporting resources.

Regards,
Dave​

Dave's Aiming Method appears to be extremely accurate, it's very easy-to-learn and is much less complicated than other aiming systems like CTE. Try it and let us know what you think!
 
Last edited:
To assist with aiming, you should try Dave's Aiming Method (DAM) http://billiards.colostate.edu/threads/aiming.html#DAM

Originally Posted by PoolSharkAllen
Dave, Out of all the aiming systems that you've tried, which one(s) would you consider to be the best?

I personally use and prefer DAM (Dave's Aiming Method). Ignore the spoofy marketing intro at the beginning and jump to the useful advice section.

Briefly, DAM suggests using all visual information available to help see the required angle and the necessary line of aim for a shot. It also recommends a purposeful and consistent pre-shot routine, with the vision center aligned directly over the aiming line for every shot, regardless of cut direction. Quiet eyes, both in the set position and during the final forward stroke, are also an important part of DAM. See the useful advice link for a more complete description with lots of supporting resources.

Regards,
Dave​

Dave's Aiming Method appears to be extremely accurate, it's very easy-to-learn and is much less complicated than other aiming systems like CTE. Try it and let us know what you think!

Tried it, don't like it! And I'm sure Dave can see through a keyhole with both eyes!! If it doesn't work, it must be physics!!
 
To assist with aiming, you should try Dave's Aiming Method (DAM) http://billiards.colostate.edu/threads/aiming.html#DAM

Originally Posted by PoolSharkAllen
Dave, Out of all the aiming systems that you've tried, which one(s) would you consider to be the best?

I personally use and prefer DAM (Dave's Aiming Method). Ignore the spoofy marketing intro at the beginning and jump to the useful advice section.

Briefly, DAM suggests using all visual information available to help see the required angle and the necessary line of aim for a shot. It also recommends a purposeful and consistent pre-shot routine, with the vision center aligned directly over the aiming line for every shot, regardless of cut direction. Quiet eyes, both in the set position and during the final forward stroke, are also an important part of DAM. See the useful advice link for a more complete description with lots of supporting resources.

Regards,
Dave​

Dave's Aiming Method appears to be extremely accurate, it's very easy-to-learn and is much less complicated than other aiming systems like CTE. Try it and let us know what you think!

Yes by all means, use a D players aiming system. He forgot to tell you the rest of the story, DAM is really DIM, DAM I MISSED.
 
Thanks.

What is funny (or sad) is that many of the sentences are direct quotes or paraphrases from statements posted by "aiming system" proponents on pool Internet forums over the years.

I have never really had anything against aiming systems over the years, because many of them do offer realistic benefits. I just object to the way they are sometimes "marketed."

Regards,
Dave

Aiming system proponents not limited too and also including those using, DAM, DIM, GB, back of ball, fractional, cte,stick aiming, mullen, and every other aiming system when originally developed.
Main point being to put something SO STUPID on a supposedly serious, pool related, plagerized filled, website is ridiculous.

LONG LIVE CTE-PRO-ONE
 
To assist with aiming, you should try Dave's Aiming Method (DAM) http://billiards.colostate.edu/threads/aiming.html#DAM

Originally Posted by PoolSharkAllen
Dave, Out of all the aiming systems that you've tried, which one(s) would you consider to be the best?

I personally use and prefer DAM (Dave's Aiming Method). Ignore the spoofy marketing intro at the beginning and jump to the useful advice section.

Briefly, DAM suggests using all visual information available to help see the required angle and the necessary line of aim for a shot. It also recommends a purposeful and consistent pre-shot routine, with the vision center aligned directly over the aiming line for every shot, regardless of cut direction. Quiet eyes, both in the set position and during the final forward stroke, are also an important part of DAM. See the useful advice link for a more complete description with lots of supporting resources.

Regards,
Dave​

Dave's Aiming Method appears to be extremely accurate, it's very easy-to-learn and is much less complicated than other aiming systems like CTE. Try it and let us know what you think!

DAM is the "system" I use! I determine my line of aim using ghostball...or maybe just experience. I make 98% of all makeable shots, so I think this has been a very accurate "system" for me! Of course, I have a little practice with it...like maybe 50+ years.;)
 
Randy,
You do know that CTE/Pro1 does NOT require "too much focus on aiming", don't you?

Once you learn the basics of the manual CTE/Pro1, and you move into Pro1 it becomes a completely automated manner of aiming and shooting. Do you not understand that?

If you don't understand that and see that, then you should continue to teach whatever aiming method that has served you for over 50 years.

If others are playing better because of CTE/Pro1, I would think you would want to learn how to use it effectively but it really doesn't matter. Go ahead and use whatever you choose. Just don't begrudge others who get it and choose to teach it or learn it. There are just too many people benefiting from CTE/Pro1 for it to not be at least as valuable as what you teach.

You won't get any argument from me, Stan or anyone else that uses CTE/Pro1, that fundamentals are a critical part of the game and that takes lots of time for your fundamentals to become flawless.

Personally, I believe that CTE/Pro1 is FAR superior to any other aiming system, primarily because it helps the player to develop a better sight picture. I mostly overlooked the CTE players from yesteryear because they didn't play shape too well and relied on a lot of instinctive aiming which isn't a bad thing but they were so caught up in the art of making balls with CTE (that's the old one taught by Hal Houle) that they failed to make advancements in other areas just as important. I figured that I could aim pretty well, hitting over a million balls and CTE was a cute and fun thing to learn but I thought that it wasn't going to make me a better player.

CTE/Pro1 has made me a better player, of that I am certain. The interesting thing is that CTE/Pro 1 helps a player in so many different areas, it is hard for me to understand why anyone would object to learning it and using it.

Contrary to what some (and maybe you too?,) want everyone to believe is that it can hurt your pool game. That is such a joke, I am shocked to hear people state this.

Anyway, I'm not much into arguing or debating and am just a struggling amateur player trying many different things to improve my game.

Again, personally speaking, I believe you are doing your students an injustice by dismissing CTE/Pro1 as a valuable teaching tool.

The bottom line is I don't have anything to gain from suggesting that people learn CTE/Pro1 and don't care if you approve of it or not. In fact I don't care if no one wants to learn it. I am positive that it has helped my game in more ways than one.

CTE/Pro1 may become the PRIMARY way to teach people how to aim correctly.
The ghost ball is imaginary and fractional aiming systems require too much guess work.

CTE/Pro1 can get the person to the correct aim line better than any other aiming system I have tried and I've tried a lot of them. :D

Most other "simple" aiming systems fall FAR SHORT of helping the player to get to the correct sight picture. CTE/Pro1 seems to do FAR MORE than any other aiming system.

Joey, everyone has an opinion on what works for THEM. I've listen to the pros. I've posted the article where 12 pros were interviewed about their aiming methods. The FACT is, the is no SECRET method of aiming. Some systems work for some but no one system works for all! Most pros have and still do use ghostball or their own variation of it! You can debate all you want but you cannot change the facts. Yes, some people have a what seems to be a natural ability...but most do not and therefore we require pratice to acquire such an ability. Aiming is only one part of of many disciplines called the fundamentals. I simply do not understand why so much talk is about the simplest discipline of all, and nobody talks about the other disciplines. There are a lot of reasons why advanced pool players will miss both easy and hard shots...few will EVER miss a shot because their aim was off!
There is NOTHING natural about playing pool! There are no natural instincts passed on by generations of our species. The skills you need to play this game you will need to acquire! The more you practice the basic fundamentals of pool, the more skills you will acquire! It is realy that simple! There are no shortcuts! To become a world class player you will need to do what every other world class player has done. Practice, practice, practice! No world class player became a world class player because of he found a shortcut or a new device that enables him or her to play better than anyone else.
There is also the mental aspect of this game that too many people dimiss. Probably the most important is motivation! What motivates you to play this game? When your motivation becomes your livelihood than you will make the sacrifices to acquire the necessary skills to get a paycheck now and then. When your motivation is to impress your buddies, you will be less likely to make the same sacrifices as a world class player!
 
Lou, it's not a matter of you agreeing with my beliefs or not. Frankly, I don't put out stuff that is in question to me, only what I know for a cold hard fact. So, when someone wants to disagree, I just look at it as their loss. It's not the disagreeing that bothers me at all. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's the way others disagree, and why they disagree.

If say to try such and such, it has really helped my game. I am doing nothing more than trying to help someone else. If someone else comes on says that it didn't work for them, fine, we all are a little different, and maybe a tweak or two would make it work for them. Something hard to do when not in person, so I let it go.

What gets to me is when you get the trolls come on here with the sole goal of sowing discontent and inhibiting knowledge, and trying to look important in their own eyes even though they don't know squat. They feel left out, don't have any knowledge to share, but want to fit in in their minds, so they take a negative side. They haven't even tried what was suggested, but claim to be an expert on the subject. Thereby, making themselves do nothing but look like fools. Then you get the few that if you say you are a democrat, they will be a republican. If you switch to a republican, they will switch to a democrat. They just have to be contrary to anything and everything.


Neil, I appreciate what you are trying to say, but honestly, what you see as cold hard fact, many of us see as highly questionable.

I don't, for a second, believe anyone here is trying too inhibit knowledge, or keep someone from getting better, or get better faster without paying their dues. To a man, I think everyone on this board embraces the principles of getting better as efficiently as possible.

However, that doesn't mean that questionable concepts get carte blanche. The ones with the question marks get and deserve *everyone's* scrutiny and examination. Where, IMO, things tend to get off-track is when the proponents of some of these questionable concepts advocate them with a zealotry and fanaticism that makes them bristles at any doubter. And then the barbs come because it is, frankly, just too funny how over the top some proponents get when it comes to pushing what they believe to be cold hard facts that the rest of us find pretty dubious.

That's all.

Lou Figueroa
 
Back
Top