I'd like to know your thoughts on Viking Cues

With the launch of the new ViKORE LD Shaft for 2013 on all models listed at or above $239, I'd like to find 10 players who shoot frequently and would be interested in buying a new Viking, and coming back here to give your opinion openly and honestly. This isn't just another sales ploy to sell cues. You'll have to send me an email to be involved. This is only available for US players however, because with the cost of shipping and duties. You'll receive a special discount for your time and effort on this. I appreciate all the comments on this thread, and I'm looking forward to reading many more.
 
What does "pick your cue" mean?

pj
chgo

It means that when you are going to play an important match then I get to choose the cue you shoot with. If you think that there isn't such a thing as playability then you ought to be able to shoot equally well with any pool cue.
 
My first quality cue was an 80's Viking. I was a beginner at the time, but I was happy with it. The local hot shot tried it and said it was a good cue and the only one I'd ever need.

By the early 2000's, Viking had only a couple of models that I didn't think were hideous. When I saw them at my first SBE, I thought they looked even cheaper in person. The current series looks much better, with about eight models vying to be my next cue. I'd also like to get one of the old three-pointers with the Viking logo under the clear butt sleeve ring.
 
My first quality cue was an 80's Viking. I was a beginner at the time, but I was happy with it. The local hot shot tried it and said it was a good cue and the only one I'd ever need.

By the early 2000's, Viking had only a couple of models that I didn't think were hideous. When I saw them at my first SBE, I thought they looked even cheaper in person. The current series looks much better, with about eight models vying to be my next cue. I'd also like to get one of the old three-pointers with the Viking logo under the clear butt sleeve ring.
I'd love to know which 8 you're interested in.
 
Who is Anthony "Two Feathers"?...Definitely not Gus Szamboti or Jerry Franklin or Dennis Searing,so why would I buy a cue designed by Tony "Two Feathers"

What if it shot better for you? :wink:

Also, better a cue designed by "two feathers" than a "visit" from a "Tony blue eyes" from Philly. :eek:
 
I have 2 Vikings from about 20 years apart. A Q1 and a B400. Your right about the big butt on the earlier cues but most of the cues back then were like that. It plays great but takes some getting used to. The Q1 was made in 98 and is an extremely sweet cue. I'm proud to own both. Here's a couple pictures.
 

Attachments

  • Q1 Viking 005 (Small).jpg
    Q1 Viking 005 (Small).jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 1,677
  • Q1 Viking 012 (Small).jpg
    Q1 Viking 012 (Small).jpg
    56.1 KB · Views: 1,156
  • Viking B400 005.jpg
    Viking B400 005.jpg
    95.6 KB · Views: 1,273
  • Viking B400 006.jpg
    Viking B400 006.jpg
    81.4 KB · Views: 1,225
I have 2 Vikings from about 20 years apart. A Q1 and a B400. Your right about the big butt on the earlier cues but most of the cues back then were like that. It plays great but takes some getting used to. The Q1 was made in 98 and is an extremely sweet cue. I'm proud to own both. Here's a couple pictures.
These are beautiful, thank you for sharing.
 
I play with a Viking G-14. No complaints here. It always does its job. If only I could do mine.
 
No one mentioned the baddest sneaky pete on earth that Viking made...

V169K_507a156209398.jpg


I don't know if it's intentional but the product shots on the Viking website are horrible.

http://shop.vikingcue.com/cues-699-...age=flypage.tpl&product_id=434&category_id=54

Anyway Viking has always been a leader in this industry, from innovative construction, to dozens of options, to sponsorship, innovative advertising and wickedly cool cues.

I actually find it to be really sad that small cue makers get tons of praise for doing things now that Viking did decades ago and which they continue to now. It seems that often a company attains a certain size then the cool stuff they do isn't "cool" anymore for some reason. But if people were really fair they would look at the designs Viking has done and give them a lot of credit for coming up with some amazing designs and figuring out how to execute them.

People forget or just don't know that Viking has been around since the 60s. Since 1965. The same time that Balabushka and Szamboti and Ginacue were getting going Viking was right there with them.

50 years of cue making counts for something.
 
No one mentioned the baddest sneaky pete on earth that Viking made...

V169K_507a156209398.jpg


I don't know if it's intentional but the product shots on the Viking website are horrible.

http://shop.vikingcue.com/cues-699-...age=flypage.tpl&product_id=434&category_id=54

Anyway Viking has always been a leader in this industry, from innovative construction, to dozens of options, to sponsorship, innovative advertising and wickedly cool cues.

I actually find it to be really sad that small cue makers get tons of praise for doing things now that Viking did decades ago and which they continue to now. It seems that often a company attains a certain size then the cool stuff they do isn't "cool" anymore for some reason. But if people were really fair they would look at the designs Viking has done and give them a lot of credit for coming up with some amazing designs and figuring out how to execute them.

People forget or just don't know that Viking has been around since the 60s. Since 1965. The same time that Balabushka and Szamboti and Ginacue were getting going Viking was right there with them.

50 years of cue making counts for something.
its on the first page john :)
 
ive never tried a viking (nor seen one, most people here play predator, McD or custom) but id love to try one.

a cuedealer in whos opinion i trust said the V pro shaft would be an extraordinary good shaft to play with. maybe i should invest some € in a basic model to try it out.

the only thing i dont like are these "shell" look inlays, i prefer beautifull woods.
 
Please get rid of the big V-Pro on the shaft. I am not a fan of logos on shafts as it is but that one is plain obnoxious.
 
No one mentioned the baddest sneaky pete on earth that Viking made...

V169K_507a156209398.jpg


I don't know if it's intentional but the product shots on the Viking website are horrible.

http://shop.vikingcue.com/cues-699-...age=flypage.tpl&product_id=434&category_id=54

Anyway Viking has always been a leader in this industry, from innovative construction, to dozens of options, to sponsorship, innovative advertising and wickedly cool cues.

I actually find it to be really sad that small cue makers get tons of praise for doing things now that Viking did decades ago and which they continue to now. It seems that often a company attains a certain size then the cool stuff they do isn't "cool" anymore for some reason. But if people were really fair they would look at the designs Viking has done and give them a lot of credit for coming up with some amazing designs and figuring out how to execute them.

People forget or just don't know that Viking has been around since the 60s. Since 1965. The same time that Balabushka and Szamboti and Ginacue were getting going Viking was right there with them.

50 years of cue making counts for something.

Can some CM explain how the hell this cue is "spliced" together?
 
i suppose its a normal fullsplice (just shorter) untill the points make the turn. afterwards its good woodchoice (no color differences) to finish the points with inlays.

i SUPPOSE its done like this
 
I've checked out Vikings at the billiard shop in town. I like a few of them. But their website is a damn embarrassment.
Not nice
 
i suppose its a normal fullsplice (just shorter) untill the points make the turn. afterwards its good woodchoice (no color differences) to finish the points with inlays.

i SUPPOSE its done like this

Nope, the wood is unbroken all the way up the points. :-)

That's why it's a $1000 cue.
 
Back
Top