Confirmed woo hoo, now someone get them to play
TAR match with top female players?
- Thread starter Sloppy Pockets
- Start date
Confirmed woo hoo, now someone get them to play
No. If they play some race to 6 in Jim bob's Monday night 8ball touney... No.
Ill bet 50 right now they don't play anything serious on purpose in the next 6months.
No bet. If they arrange to play a match and there is a prize then it's serious enough for me.
Do you guys want to play?
I will stream it FREE.
It could happen in Tunica, Kelly is signed up for the Ultimate 10 ball
What format: ( just mention some possibilities)
10 ball race to 100 - over 2 days possibly
10 ball 12-15 ahead - like 10 hrs a day?
Whats the bet:
5k
10k
20k
???
please speak up, lets get this set up, everyone looks interested.
No need to fly elsewhere when both of you will be in Tunica.
I will stream it FREE.
It could happen in Tunica, Kelly is signed up for the Ultimate 10 ball
What format: ( just mention some possibilities)
10 ball race to 100 - over 2 days possibly
10 ball 12-15 ahead - like 10 hrs a day?
Whats the bet:
5k
10k
20k
???
please speak up, lets get this set up, everyone looks interested.
No need to fly elsewhere when both of you will be in Tunica.
Exactly...if they're going to play each other that's good enough to call it a match.
Yes - if they play on the challenge table at the SBE. Whatever they play.
Ill be there and will play
Race to 50 or longer for 5k or more would be nice
She posted in this thread this morning. I think it is pretty safe to assume she will be checking back and posting again.
If they play I'll lay you 3k to 2k. I will post money if needed.
That's funny, I was just saying this to my bud yesterday. I'd def vote for a Bartram vs GYK or XTP match... My money would be on one of those ladies because they are not just top female players, but just top-notch talented players regardless.
Last edited:
I just at the table last weekend between Jeanette Lee and Warren Kiamco, bar box 9 ball alternating breaks. The only reason Jeanette lost was not being able to see te one after the break.
With that being said, on a big table and winner breaks I don't think it is much of a contest.
Jeanette did take fourth.
I enjoyed watching the ladies, in the short races, but I don't think I would purchase a Tar Match.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
With that being said, on a big table and winner breaks I don't think it is much of a contest.
Jeanette did take fourth.
I enjoyed watching the ladies, in the short races, but I don't think I would purchase a Tar Match.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
i could be wrong but XTP seems way out of stroke. She may be too involved with her businesses over there. I dont see anything on the schedule that would bring GYK to the USA now until Mohegan Sun-usually October. If there is a WPBA US Open, she will probably be here for that but i dont see it on the WPBA site?
GYK has had a lot of experience VS Men-not intimidated at all. That would be very fun to watch fer sure.
A set for 20 k might make her come over?
You can have the last $400, your $600 to my $400. Again this is if they play ANYTHING. Any match at all in any event anywhere.
Just kind of an observation but why would any known professional player be serious about gambling?
Can anyone point me to a professional player or a well known player who gambles on pool who makes a living from gambling on pool?
And if they do manage to have a positive net worth what is that amount?
It seems to me that amateurs are way more enthralled with gambling on pool and matching up than professional players are.
I mean I like to gamble and I like to see heavyweight match-ups but frankly that's just me being voyeuristic and thrill-seeking. It seems to me that for a known professional player gambling on pool is a 50/50 proposition at it's absolute best. Either you are going up against tough competition or you are giving up the nuts.
So unless the player is staked I don't see the appeal for a top player to gamble other than just to establish who is the top dog.
I don't see what's wrong with a high stakes match where both players are getting paid something and the winner gets a lot more. It's like this in just about every other sport where it's head to head action. In boxing the loser still makes money for being there and I don't see why it should be any different for the PROFESSIONAL pool player.
Now from an amateur standpoint I like the romantic old west shootout where the loser is left dead in the street. One side walks away with all the money and the other side is broke and depressed. But when thinking about my friends who have to eke out a living playing this game I don't see any upside to running around the world trying to match up even or have to give up the nuts gambling.