Didn't understand John's thinking in the last game. He sold out twice in spots where he was in no trouble. The last one he had the edge in ball position??
Barton barking at Lou, put his cue back together
Barton barking at Lou, put his cue back together
Barton barking at Lou, put his cue back together
He won, ran out last 5 easy after John sold out an obvious combo of 2 spotted balls that had been knudged slightly. Lou even aimed it up with his cue on the prior turn. John had to be aware of the sellout.
I guess Lou owned JB forever.
Well, it would have to go off for more than $10k. Otherwise, Lou isn't betting his own. He's playing on John's money for the first set....Who was Frazier without Ali? I think this story is far from over.
At least John only went off for 10K - it could have been far worse.
I would like to see a rematch preferable with each betting their own.
As far as the match, they both played respectably considering the stakes.
Well, it would have to go off for more than $10k. Otherwise, Lou isn't betting his own. He's playing on John's money for the first set....
It surprised me because Lou had just very deliberately left the combo there and John had seen it right before then.
On the previous turn John had wisely taken another ball away from there and getting it uptable and then he comes back and doesnt move them. He had to be thinking he could lay the 11 near his hole but even so I think Lou might have had the combo and a chance to move the 11
It's not John's money anymore. It's Lou's backers.
Fixed that for you,