You Ask "Who Makes The Best Bushka Tribute?"

I've owned or examined just about EVERY note worthy makers "Bushka" tribute ( I had 13 at one time ). Though some look nice and have a quality build, none of them in every aspect from execution to fit & finish are in the same league as Tascarella. Once you get one in your hands you realize the difference. If you've ever owned/held/played with a late model (70's) Balabushka AND have done the same with a Tascarella, you know what I mean.
 
Deanoc said it best....boasting....bragging....pulling someone's leg 'bout their pool cues, well, that's what guys do......anyone that's been in the service understands that ranking on each other is a game men play but the problem is sometimes it can and does get out of hand and unintentionally becomes a little too personal.

Jamie does a great thing with the Cue of the Year Contest....be there should be sub-categories, like the best such & such cue design. The pitfall to be avoided is it could get out of hand and you wind up with a dozen different cue awards....that would be a disaster. But it would be fun to have a contest on the most "authentic" looking Balabushka design, or the most :handsome" design, etc.

I've posted about this cue design I sketched and blah, blah, blah....I realize other Azers aren't really interested or curious in reading my posts and that it's really more like I have the cart before the horse. People want to see photographic evidence your cue exists and then they'll be the judge. Nonetheless, when you're excited or hopeful about a pool cue you'll be getting, it's understandable and normal to express excitement and exuberance over your cue.....but it has to be reasonably expressed and not go over the top.

Pete Tascarella is a cue-maker that ranks among the top 20 cue-makers in history in my opinion and the cues I'm having made aren't from a top 20 cue-maker but I'm satisfied dealing with the top 50 ranking which I consider the cue-makers I'm using to fall within. Nonetheless, anyone can hit a grand slam as long as they have a chance to bat. There's this new cue-maker named Eddie Cohen....don't know him, never held one of his cues, haven't heard much about him from others....but based upon the photos I've seen of his cues, sometimes tells me that guy could make a monster Bushka design cue.

My point is if there was a contest for the most handsome, I'd be willing to place a bet Cohen would be a strong contender, if not win it. My cue from Mr. Owen, there's really nothings epic about it other than it's what I drew.......the cue Mr. Rauenzahn has started for me, it's just a Bushka style I admire and it's a little different that's all......but neither cue has any assurance of being a top shelf cue....it's all a matter of trust and hope until any cue reaches you regardless of the cue-maker.

Pete Tascarella is a master cue-maker and the bar height set by this Balabushka design cue he made is very high and it should be since it's a Tascarella cue.....one of the experts on authenticating cues. So he should know what a great Balanushka cue design resembles and he obviously does....just look at the photos of this cue.

Nonetheless, I am still hopeful that the cue being made for me will become a hands down winner, as least for my tastes in Bushka designs. Mr. Rauenzahn showed me the wood he's selected for my cue's forearm and it's a great selection with lots of burls that will become accentuated through staining. And we worked hard picking the right veneer combination and changing the rings....so it's nothing more than my sheer enthusiasm over what's being attempted........I root for the A's all season long, even thought I know the chances of them winning in post season seems jinxed......but all season long it's more interesting when you follow and root for a team.

It's the same way with pool cues......you hope, you cheer and root for your cue but in the end, there can only be one winner.....one Cue of the Year Winner.....and only one can claim the title of the best Bushka design cue.......yeah, I think a contest would be fun but .....Messrs. Tascarella & Rauenzahn had better be careful because I think this youngster "Eddie Cohen" is a sleeper and very well could the cue-maker of the future to be reckoned with when it comes to winning any titles.

But I'm still stubborn and ballsy enuf to still believe my cue would win the Bushka crown if it existed. As for my custom that's due any time now, I got a hunch I may have gone over the top with the design and I hope I don't regret it. I stopped receiving progress photos at my request and the only photos I did receive....well, I'll put it this way, I felt a little nauseous.......it looked too colorful....almost like a clown's make-up which isn't Mr. Owen's fault at all......he made the cue as I specified the design......let's face it, you can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear.....in a couple of weeks I will know for sure.

I was only ranking in jest with the owner of the Tascarella cue because let's face it, has Pete ever made a cue that wasn't a honey and this cue is more than a jarful.....It's absolutely a gorgeous Balabushka design pool cue.......which will be fun to try and dethrone even though the title "King of the Bushka Cues" isn't a official title.......Jamie, you out there......got room for another contest?


Matt B.
 
Last edited:
Being happy is all that matters. I am... I hope the same for you!


Deanoc said it best....boasting....bragging....pulling someone's leg 'bout their pool cues, well, that's what guys do......anyone that's been in the service understands that ranking on each other is a game men play but the problem is sometimes it can and does get out of hand and unintentionally becomes a little too personal.

Jamie does a great thing with the Cue of the Year Contest....be there should be sub-categories, like the best such & such cue design. The pitfall to be avoided is it could get out of hand and you wind up with a dozen different cue awards....that would be a disaster. But it would be fun to have a contest on the most "authentic" looking Balabushka design, or the most :handsome" design, etc.

I've posted about this cue design I sketched and blah, blah, blah....I realize other Azers aren't really interested or curious in reading my posts and that it's really more like I have the cart before the horse. People want to see photographic evidence your cue exists and then they'll be the judge. Nonetheless, when you're excited or hopeful about a pool cue you'll be getting, it's understandable and normal to express excitement and exuberance over your cue.....but it has to be reasonably expressed and not go over the top.

Pete Tascarella is a cue-maker that ranks among the top 20 cue-makers in history in my opinion and the cues I'm having made aren't from a top 20 cue-maker but I'm satisfied dealing with the top 50 ranking which I consider the cue-makers I'm using to fall within. Nonetheless, anyone can hit a grand slam as long as they have a chance to bat. There's this new cue-maker named Eddie Cohen....don't know him, never held one of his cues, haven't heard much about him from others....but based upon the photos I've seen of his cues, sometimes tells me that guy could make a monster Bushka design cue.

My point is if there was a contest for the most handsome, I'd be willing to place a bet Cohen would be a strong contender, if not win it. My cue from Mr. Owen, there's really nothings epic about it other than it's what I drew.......the cue Mr. Rauenzahn has started for me, it's just a Bushka style I admire and it's a little different that's all......but neither cue has any assurance of being a top shelf cue....it's all a matter of trust and hope until any cue reaches you regardless of the cue-maker.

Pete Tascarella is a master cue-maker and the bar height set by this Balabushka design cue he made is very high and it should be since it's a Tascarella cue.....one of the experts on authenticating cues. So he should know what a great Balanushka cue design resembles and he obviously does....just look at the photos of this cue.

Nonetheless, I am still hopeful that the cue being made for me will become a hands down winner, as least for my tastes in Bushka designs. Mr. Rauenzahn showed me the wood he's selected for my cue's forearm and it's a great selection with lots of burls that will become accentuated through staining. And we worked hard picking the right veneer combination and changing the rings....so it's nothing more than my sheer enthusiasm over what's being attempted........I root for the A's all season long, even thought I know the chances of them winning in post season seems jinxed......but all season long it's more interesting when you follow and root for a team.

It's the same way with pool cues......you hope, you cheer and root for your cue but in the end, there can only be one winner.....one Cue of the Year Winner.....and only one can claim the title of the best Bushka design cue.......yeah, I think a contest would be fun but .....Messrs. Tascarella & Rauenzahn had better be careful because I think this youngster "Eddie Cohen" is a sleeper and very well could the cue-maker of the future to be reckoned with when it comes to winning any titles.

But I'm still stubborn and ballsy enuf to still believe my cue would win the Bushka crown if it existed. As for my custom that's due any time now, I got a hunch I may have gone over the top with the design and I hope I don't regret it. I stopped receiving progress photos at my request and the only photos I did receive....well, I'll put it this way, I felt a little nauseous.......it looked too colorful....almost like a clown's make-up which isn't Mr. Owen's fault at all......he made the cue as I specified the design......let's face it, you can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear.....in a couple of weeks I will know for sure.

I was only ranking in jest with the owner of the Tascarella cue because let's face it, has Pete ever made a cue that wasn't a honey and this cue is more than a jarful.....It's absolutely a gorgeous Balabushka design pool cue.......which will be fun to try and dethrone even though the title "King of the Bushka Cues" isn't a official title.......Jamie, you out there......got room for another contest?


Matt B.
 
That's an easy answer - Tascarella!


Great cue skins!


Funny how some people seem to be in the "know"... :killingme:



The quality of work speaks for itself.


Thank you for sharing!
 
I met Bobby at the SBE this year. Had a short chat and he showed me this cue. I looked at it and indeed it was a special cue, Congrats!
Regards
Peter

Thanks Peter. I just love the way the Pete's do the cues... everything is just spot on and they feel so nice and this one has a nice crisp hit to it...
 
Tascarella....quite likely....a strong contender admittedly....but his version ivory cue joint gets both thumbs down.
I think it's an imitator but that's only my opinion on his cue joint.....and yes, I have played with one of his cues.

In the looks department, A+ all the way but I consider him as strictly a piloted steel joint cue-maker and that's why
I'll never buy a Tascarella pool cue and gosh, Tascarella cues are amply available with the secondary resale market.

Matt B.
 
Last edited:
That's an easy answer - Tascarella!


Great cue skins!


Funny how some people seem to be in the "know"... :killingme:



The quality of work speaks for itself.


Thank you for sharing!

Thanks! Well you for sure know top quality....

There's nothing like that feeling of a perfect cue in your hands. Once you get that feeling you don't want to settle for anything else... sometimes hard to accomplish though... :smile:
 
Tascarella....quite likely....a strong contender admittedly....but his version ivory cue joint gets both thumbs down.
I think it's an imitator but that's only my opinion on his cue joint.....and yes, I have played with one of his cues.

In the looks department, A+ all the way but I consider him as strictly a piloted steel joint cue-maker and that's why
I'll never buy a Tascarella pool cue and golly gee, there's lots of Tascarella cues to buy on the secondary resale market.

Matt B.

"imitator".... ah... no.... He's been doing that sleeved ivory over stainless since the 70's... AND it's the best playing piloted joint I've ever played with... but then again I heard that's subjective..:rolleyes:

As far as you not buying one, that's cool more for us.... Thank You! :smile:
 
I have now my Tascarella and I can say, the Best steel jointed Cue I have ever hit with, the Showman I had was the best but this Beast beat them easy. :thumbup: to the Petes
 
I love this cue..even was a contender for moving a few cues to buy it...MASTERPIECE FOR SURE.....cgs
 
I have now my Tascarella and I can say, the Best steel jointed Cue I have ever hit with, the Showman I had was the best but this Beast beat them easy. :thumbup: to the Petes

Absolutely agree. Their compression joint is always a perfect fit. That plays a huge roll. The ivory over stainless joint ( ya know, the one they "imitate"... :rolleyes: You loose all credibility when you discredit things you know nothing about )... anyway, that joint is VERY special. Some say it plays the same as a stainless joint but it doesn't. I has a hybrid type hit feel. Hard to explain but I like it lots. :smile:
 
I love this cue..even was a contender for moving a few cues to buy it...MASTERPIECE FOR SURE.....cgs

It is everything I thought it would be. Masterfully crafted in every way. The custom engraved joint protectors are cool too. The were made by Jim Baxter and include original Tascarella stainless rings and stacked colored rings made from the left over veneer stock. Nice engraving on top too....
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    58 KB · Views: 515
"imitator".... ah... no.... He's been doing that sleeved ivory over stainless since the 70's... AND it's the best playing piloted joint I've ever played with... but then again I heard that's subjective..:rolleyes:

As far as you not buying one, that's cool more for us.... Thank You! :smile:

Most "real" collectors know a cue maker is never judged based upon one cue and one persons jaded opinion. BUT it must be true since I just read it on the Internet. :roll eyes:


Much more could be said but it doesn't need to be. The Tascarella's are very highly desirable cue makers. Not sure where the thought of "lots of Tascarellas to buy on the secondary market" has anything to do with THIS cue. Especially when compared to certain cue makers in certain signature lines where a cue go from conception to delivery in 6 months.


Beautiful cue regardless of the naysayers who ALWAYS interject their narrow-minded opinions. THIS cue is a very high level.


But to get back on track - if I recall Pete Sr. bought some equipment from a certain HOF cue maker. Who was it again? :cool:


Congratulations and thanks for sharing!
 
.......Much more could be said but it doesn't need to be.....

MUCH more :smile:

Ya know a loose definition of Joey Golds "Cognoscenti" is " those who know the difference"... Some makers deserve to have "Cognoscenti" as a tag line after their names... Tascarella has definitely earned it. :cool:
 
Most "real" collectors know a cue maker is never judged based upon one cue and one persons jaded opinion. BUT it must be true since I just read it on the Internet. :roll eyes:


Much more could be said but it doesn't need to be. The Tascarella's are very highly desirable cue makers. Not sure where the thought of "lots of Tascarellas to buy on the secondary market" has anything to do with THIS cue. Especially when compared to certain cue makers in certain signature lines where a cue go from conception to delivery in 6 months.
Beautiful cue regardless of the naysayers who ALWAYS interject their narrow-minded opinions. THIS cue is a very high level.


But to get back on track - if I recall Pete Sr. bought some equipment from a certain HOF cue maker. Who was it again? :cool:


Congratulations and thanks for sharing!

I sense a jab at the viability of a quality cue being built/delivered within 6 months...if I'm wrong, apologies...Bill Stroud posted on here once that the man hours, resting times between turns and finish add up to a total of about 3 or 4 months (IIRC). Whether that's spread out over 6 months or a year is irrelevant to the comparative quality of the cue. A cue that takes a year may do so because of the overall workload and number of projects going on at the same time, not because of minimum times for completion. A longer build time doesn't necessarily correlate to higher quality, or more to the point a shorter build time doesn't mean less quality.

For the record, I've never seen a Tascarella that I didn't absolutely love. I've never hit with one, can't judge that, but I'll take most folks' word for it. The secondary market is a function of the popularity of these cues and the increase in value; I judge that from the fact that a large number of the flipped Tascs are unchalked, so the seller can't be dissatisified with the hit, they haven't even tried it. :smile:
 
Most "real" collectors know a cue maker is never judged based upon one cue and one persons jaded opinion. BUT it must be true since I just read it on the Internet. :roll eyes:


Much more could be said but it doesn't need to be. The Tascarella's are very highly desirable cue makers. Not sure where the thought of "lots of Tascarellas to buy on the secondary market" has anything to do with THIS cue. Especially when compared to certain cue makers in certain signature lines where a cue go from conception to delivery in 6 months.


Beautiful cue regardless of the naysayers who ALWAYS interject their narrow-minded opinions. THIS cue is a very high level.


But to get back on track - if I recall Pete Sr. bought some equipment from a certain HOF cue maker. Who was it again?


Congratulations and thanks for sharing!
I know Chris's question is rhetorical,but some folks may find the answer interesting.
In response to Chris's question............

Pete Tascarella learned how to build cues by looking over the shoulder of George Balabushka.Pete used to bring coffee to George Balabushka's shop every morning and he "hung out" there and learned from George.Years later when Balabushka passed away,Pete was able to buy the shop equipment and all the left over parts from George's widow.Pete, as a cue builder is the closest thing that you will get to a "Bushka"
Pete's tribute cues not only look like George's work,but due to modern materials and build technology,probably play as good or better than the older "Bushka's" Pete's Bushka tributes are very true to the originals.Including some left over Balabushka parts.
Marc
 
Last edited:
I sense a jab at the viability of a quality cue being built/delivered within 6 months...if I'm wrong, apologies...Bill Stroud posted on here once that the man hours, resting times between turns and finish add up to a total of about 3 or 4 months (IIRC). Whether that's spread out over 6 months or a year is irrelevant to the comparative quality of the cue. A cue that takes a year may do so because of the overall workload and number of projects going on at the same time, not because of minimum times for completion. A longer build time doesn't necessarily correlate to higher quality, or more to the point a shorter build time doesn't mean less quality.

For the record, I've never seen a Tascarella that I didn't absolutely love. I've never hit with one, can't judge that, but I'll take most folks' word for it. The secondary market is a function of the popularity of these cues and the increase in value; I judge that from the fact that a large number of the flipped Tascs are unchalked, so the seller can't be dissatisified with the hit, they haven't even tried it. :smile:

I should have written "initial cue maker contact to delivery".


Yes, it was a jab. I have no issue saying it publicly as well. There are some highly desirable cues being made today by highly sought after cue makers. These cues can be sold in 10 minutes making substantial profits.


Then there are a huge group of other cue maker nut huggers that like to "pump & dump". As much as I appreciate this website, it is a breeding ground for wannabe know-it-alls. They spew their bile from a soapbox for all to hear. Some of these people also disparage the top tier cue makers because they do not return the calls/emails/PM's/text messages. Then there is another subset that take the secondary pricing of cues and say so & so charges too much. Or so & so cue maker doesn't make a great cue - it's all hype.

^^^This is a group of nits - plain & simple ^^^



Hope I cleared this up for you. ;)
 
No need to brag.... I got the "Prince" waiting in the wings... Lol...


Skins-

I am not trying to an a$$, but I prefer your "Prince" to the tribute cue.

That cue IMO, is the best Tasc I have seen.

Sorry.

Ken
 
For what it may be worth, two different widely respected cue-makers both told me the very same thing in the course of making me a cue. The forearm veneers are tackled first because the gluing/drying process involves many months of sit time 4-6 months. Each cue-maker is currently making me a cue and both cue-makers gave me identical time frames for finishing my cue.

I ordered my cue from Bob Owen last July and it arrives this month. I ordered a cue from Jerry Rauenzahn this week and he told me 9 1/2 - 10 months....same as Bob........we discussed my cue in detail and afterwards, Jerry said exactly what Bob Owen mentioned about assembling the cue and the related timeframes for the entire process.

The complexity of the cue design adds to the total number of hours but there is going to be some base number that correlates to making a cue and the veneers take awhile if you want the cue to stand the test of time.

Matt B.
 
I should have written "initial cue maker contact to delivery".


Yes, it was a jab. I have no issue saying it publicly as well. There are some highly desirable cues being made today by highly sought after cue makers. These cues can be sold in 10 minutes making substantial profits.


Then there are a huge group of other cue maker nut huggers that like to "pump & dump". As much as I appreciate this website, it is a breeding ground for wannabe know-it-alls. They spew their bile from a soapbox for all to hear. Some of these people also disparage the top tier cue makers because they do not return the calls/emails/PM's/text messages. Then there is another subset that take the secondary pricing of cues and say so & so charges too much. Or so & so cue maker doesn't make a great cue - it's all hype.

^^^This is a group of nits - plain & simple ^^^



Hope I cleared this up for you. ;)

Agreed..............
 
Back
Top