Thank you Captain Obvious..... I don't care what he charges...and yes, someone mentioned they were being held for "ransom" thus where I got the info that he was charging more than the standard rate.... but if someone over charges for simple photos from an accident to take a cut of some widows benefits, I'm going to call them a scumbag.....you don't have to like it..... the world is filled with them.. get use to it.
What is the appropriate price for "simple photos from an accident"? $0? $100? $250? $728.47? What distinguishes "simple" accident photos from non-simple accident photos, and what is the appropriate price for non-simple ones?
(I'm only addressing the side discussion over applying subjective judgments to appropriate pricing in a market-based economy. The original post and topic are nonsense.)
Cory
Last edited: