Thanks for the support
Thanks for the support folks. My response to Joe could have been handled differently but I didn't appreciate his condescension or pompous "interpretation." My "thin skin" may be more due to the fact that I expect a sense of professionalism and guidance particularly in the cue maker section. In the past I've typically had great guidance and my interaction with Joe won't ruin my expectations.
I've never had a "strike" before so it's not a huge deal. I agree that it's somewhat heavy handed but in the interest of the community it's not a big deal.
I actually do share Joe's sentiment that we can move on. The answer to my question was "no one else has worked with Pete." See how simple that was Joe
-Ryan
Thanks for the support folks. My response to Joe could have been handled differently but I didn't appreciate his condescension or pompous "interpretation." My "thin skin" may be more due to the fact that I expect a sense of professionalism and guidance particularly in the cue maker section. In the past I've typically had great guidance and my interaction with Joe won't ruin my expectations.
I've never had a "strike" before so it's not a huge deal. I agree that it's somewhat heavy handed but in the interest of the community it's not a big deal.
I actually do share Joe's sentiment that we can move on. The answer to my question was "no one else has worked with Pete." See how simple that was Joe
-Ryan