Just a passing thought...although there are "world championship" tournaments, if it's not feasibly accessible to everyone, is it still a "world championship"?
I'm not talking about viewership. I'm talking about participation.
Just a passing thought...although there are "world championship" tournaments, if it's not feasibly accessible to everyone, is it still a "world championship"?
I'm thinking along the lines of IPT. It was a pretty good format, and it drew players from out of the woodworks with the prize money. It's just too bad pool doesn't have the same money as golf.
Just a passing thought...although there are "world championship" tournaments, if it's not feasibly accessible to everyone, is it still a "world championship"?
Just a passing thought...although there are "world championship" tournaments, if it's not feasibly accessible to everyone, is it still a "world championship"?
That is a dumb question
That is like saying the boxing, soccer and any sports world championship before age of TV are not world championships .
You have embarassed yourself . Let us pretend you are drunk and just passing by:grin:
Just a passing thought...although there are "world championship" tournaments, if it's not feasibly accessible to everyone, is it still a "world championship"?
Who says?------------World Championship tournaments must have a field of atleast 32 players and 100k in prize money ,,
1
I mean financially feasible.
Are there any tournaments in the US with $100,000.00 prize funds?World Championship tournaments must have a field of atleast 32 players and 100k in prize money ,,
1