OK, you can't describe it. Neither can anybody else.
But we're supposed to be able to see it clearly in a video...?
pj
chgo
CTE Pro One Visual Sweep versus Manual Pivot
- Thread starter 5am
- Start date
But we're supposed to be able to see it clearly in a video...?
pj
chgo
Yeah, it's indescribable, you had to be there.
What a disappointment. Maybe next time.
You hang in there.
In your head? I think it's a little crowded in there already.
Thanks. Oh wait, you're not talking to me...
pj
chgo
A first principal in learning is motivation and more specifically desire, NONE OF WHICH YOU HAVE.
This is on DVD1 and DVD 2 and on YouTube. The answer has also been stated on AZ forums multiple times.
Also, Just days ago you started a thread in this forum and therein proclaimed that the CTE VISUALS were the same as quarter alignments.
A question to you.....are you so visually weak that after your DVD1 review as well as 4 additional years with chances to learn the visuals, you really believe your proclamation in that thread to be true or were you just spouting off to cause turmoil in this forum?
I think the moderators can easily determine that you are in these threads for no other reason than to stir the pot.
Stan Shuffett
Last edited:
I don't want to use any aiming system, but I have no trouble understanding most of them - and users of most of them have no trouble explaining then clearly.
Please point to any of those that you feel is accurate, Stan. I obviously can't tell which is which.
Asking simple polite questions about the system you sell is a problem? Why on Earth would that be, unless the questions themselves are problematic?
I believe I've been way more polite than you, Stan. What should the mods think of that?
pj
chgo
Last edited:
Your questions have been thoroughly answered multiple times.....and you the brilliant mind that you are just publicly stated that CTE visuals are the same as quarters in alignments. lol
lol. Lol lol lol. How visually weak can one get to think that?? Lol
Stan Shuffett
But you do use an aiming system, two or three of them at the same time. Here's what you posted in another thread about your aiming SYSTEMS.
"I initially line up with my stick pointing CB center to ghost ball center, but I've never actually aimed (got to the final alignment) using any method but contact point-to-contact point "feel" learned through practice and memorization (aided by conscious comparison of where I'm pointing my stick)."
You use a STICK aiming system, combined with a GHOST BALL aiming system, a CONTACT POINT aiming system, and then sprinkle some LIZARD head movement up and down to allow your final guesswork (aka "feel) to kick in for finalizing the entire process.
If you don't want to use any aiming system, there's a lot of streamlining that needs to be done to get to nothing. I pity anyone else who goes through all the mental calculations and physical gyrations you do. Sounds like a sure fire recipe for being a hack player. LMAO!
Aren't CTE's "aimpoints A, B and C" the 3/4, 1/2 and 1/4 fraction on the OB, and don't CTE's "visuals" use the CB-edge-to-"aimpoint" line in some way? Aren't these the "fractions" alignments?
I admit I don't understand any of the descriptions of how these fractional alignments are used to "acquire the visual" - that's what I've been asking about. I'd appreciate your clarification - but I'm not optimistic about getting it. Too bad - I'm sure I'm not the only one confused.
pj
chgo
This was explained and demonstrated in Chapter 10 on DVD1. You can find info on this topic from my YouTube videos as well.
And the problem is.....you do not understand ANYTHING about the descriptions for CTE visuals. You did a review. For DVD1!!! Did you say in your review that you understood nothing about the visuals and how they were to be used? Will your posting history bear out that you have acquired ZERO knowledge about CTE visuals and directions on using them?
If you understand nothing which is equal to not understanding ANYthing about the visual descriptions for CTE, I call BS and say you are boldface liar to make that statement. It is impossible to focus on this topic as much you have for 4 years and know nothing about the descriptions of the CTE visuals beyond the initial irrelevant similarity to fractions concerning the aim points. I have explained the visuals in multiple locations many times and you know NOTHING...impossible
Stan Shuffett
Last edited:
Actually, Stan, it is possible. He doesn't understand simply because he keeps on comparing to other systems. The first rule in learning CTE is to let go of what you currently know and try something new. That is something he can't or won't do. He is constantly comparing where there is no comparison.
Pat, if you really do want to learn it, the first thing you have to do is let go of what you already know. This system stands alone.
Here are some of your own words about CTE, Stan - with links to the posts in which you said them. Please tell me which post contains the clear description of "acquiring the visual" I've overlooked for so long:
"another dimension of seeing"
"never supposed to be"
"in another dimension, a completely different plane"
"on a completely different plane "
"instructions that were never supposed to be"
"aiming on a different plane or in a new dimension"
"A NEW DIMENSION IN AIMING"
"CTE was not supposed to be"
"an aiming process that occurs on a different plane or in a completely new dimension"
"a method of seeing entirely of its own domain"
"This perception is so different that it was never suppose to be"
"AIMING THAT OCCURS ON A DIFFERENT PLANE OR IN A NEW DIMENSION"
"a language, a set of directions that your eyes and body cannot express"
"This description was never supposed to happen and clearly represents aiming in a new dimension"
"This was not supposed to be. Our eyes and body have no words for this."
"CTE is of another dimension"
"it's in a completely different dimension from what you know and understand"
pj
chgo
Last edited:
Neil,
I think his issues are way deeper than "letting go".
You are well aware of his decade old plus stance of being negative toward CTE.
It is impossible for that man not to know SOMETHING about how to use CTE PRO ONE visuals. So, when he makes an outlandish statement as he did, his goal is merely to tear down my work as it has been all along. I am surprised he can get by with it.....
Stan Shuffett
To your grand dismay.....real CTE is of another dimension and aiming that actually occurs on a different plane. Real CTE is changing the game and you can't stand it. In fact you hate it......that is why you are a HATER!
I will not run and tuck my tail from the truth! My DVD2 is named AIMING IN A NEW DIMENSION!! I am proud of it!
You hate my work so badly that you blatantly misrepresent it and lie about it.
Stan Shuffett
Last edited:
But you endorse CTE's "aimpoint lines", "visuals", "sweeps", "pivots", etc., etc. - a "system from another dimension" that's still being "explained" every day for years on this forum, even to those who believe in it?
lol
Yeah, that's credible.
pj
chgo
And furthermore PJ......do you want to bet a thousand that I can not locate posts of mine here on AZ where I explain the CTE PRO ONE process from visuals to CCB.
Stan Shuffett
Stan Shuffett
Why do you need a silly bet to point to it, Stan?
Anyway, I can see there won't be any real answers about this. Good luck with your sales.
pj
chgo
What you are is a LOSER..... You want to tear down someone's work with lies and misrepresentations. Don't think for a minute that I jwill ust take it!! .YOU chose the wrong to pick on....Mr. Internet Bully... I do not mind calling BS on your crap.
GL WITH YOUR SALES!!!! YOU SAY? I say that is another one of YOUR twisted statements....you do not mean that....once again you are not truthful with your wording.
Stan Shuffett
Last edited:
Actually I do mean that - your system may be just what some need, and I hope they find it. I just wish your sales pitch wasn't so unrealistic - it misleads naive beginners (and some others) to think there's a magic aiming bullet.
Again, good luck with your sales - and with understanding what I'm after.
pj
chgo
You have a problem. When people lack facts, the result is always name calling. It is truly sad that you act the way you do. If you would only answer questions instead of telling people they don't understand. Maybe they would understand if you would answer questions.
Here is a typical situation and they way you handle it.
"How can every person being different sizes, shapes, body positions, etc, have the exact same movement in Pro One that equals 1/2 mechanical Pivot"
Stan's reply, "You are an idiot, and don't understand REAL CTE"
If a hole ( a question) is not filled (answered) it remains a hole.
You have not sincerely tried to learn CTE PRO ONE....After 4/5 years you still do not even know the visuals..that says it all right there in a nutshell.
WHAT YOU ARE AFTER IS TO DISCREDIT MY WORK WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING IT!
OTHERS have learned it but not you.....you can not even get past the visuals.
So please do not continue with your crap!
Stan Shuffett
Last edited: