I think it's an exercise in convincing yourself of that.There is an element of 'suspending belief' when using [CTE]. It really is an exercise in altered perception.
pj
chgo
I think it's an exercise in convincing yourself of that.There is an element of 'suspending belief' when using [CTE]. It really is an exercise in altered perception.
I think it's an exercise in convincing yourself of that.
pj
chgo
I wanted to post something to bring the conversation back to CTE.
I find CTE to be a powerful tool and very helpful. There is an element of 'suspending belief' when using this method. It really is an exercise in altered perception. I can't explain why a shot--w/ the exact same cut angle--will use different CTE 'solutions' depending on the distance between CB and OB (I actually know the reason), but I know that CTE helps me find the shot line. Sometimes it works best for me when I let my (67 yr old) eyes blur--it's that kind of an experience of altered perception. I found this short video of Stevie Moore to be of interest, challenging, and it captures the nature of CTE perceptions;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1mlnRiAXA8
I see you're still trying to convince yourself of that.cookie:I think it's an exercise in convincing yourself of that.
pj
chgo
But then again you have no experience to base your opinion on.
I think it's an exercise in convincing yourself of that.
pj
chgo
I thought We'd already had the discussion about adding constructively?
Last chance.
I see you're still trying to convince yourself of that.
pj
chgo
He actually makes the comment , I'll show you how , but really doesn't show you how. Just shoots the ball's in. Logic would tell you if the system took you 6"s on the first shot it should on the second, but that's not the nature of cte, it takes you to right angles. You'll see for yourself.
You are absolutely right. You you wanna understand pool better PJ,(especially cte) stop looking at things logically.![]()
CTE is not a system that is easily taught or easily understood. I understood the concept of it very quickly but it took a combination of 3 lessons with Stevie(twice) and Stan(once) for me to connect the dots completely. I hate to say it but I fell like CTE is something that(for most) cannot be learned through DVD or you tube instruction. It is something that most people need to be able to have one on one or group instruction in person to be able to fully grasp the concept of it....
I have the CTE Pro One DVD's and me and my friend Russell watched them several times from begining to end and still can not figure out how to use CTE. I just want to look at the ball and know exactly where to hit it. No where in the CTE DVD does it tell me how to do that.
I am the OP and after many months CTE still makes no sense to me...
I have the CTE Pro One DVD's and me and my friend Russell watched them several times from begining to end and still can not figure out how to use CTE. I just want to look at the ball and know exactly where to hit it. No where in the CTE DVD does it tell me how to do that.
I am the OP and after many months CTE still makes no sense to me...
CTE is not a system that is easily taught or easily understood. I understood the concept of it very quickly but it took a combination of 3 lessons with Stevie(twice) and Stan(once) for me to connect the dots completely. I hate to say it but I fell like CTE is something that(for most) cannot be learned through DVD or you tube instruction. It is something that most people need to be able to have one on one or group instruction in person to be able to fully grasp the concept of it.
I personally challenge all of the doubters to spend time with Stevie or Stan learning the system in person before you continue to discredit the legitimacy of it. We fear what we do not understand and it is very clear that those of you that constantly attempt to discredit the system are not understanding what it does. I am not saying you are not smart enough or incompetent I'm just saying that the information available may not explain it in a way that connects the dots for you.
My dad, nobcitypool, and I both use CTE/Pro 1 and I'm not sure why but it clicked for me very quickly and for him it has taken much longer to learn to trust it. I much prefer the Pro 1 approach and he prefers the manual pivot. I think it's because I decide on the speed and spin needed, find my perception, get down on the shot and go without giving it anymore thought than is absolutely necessary. He doesn't do that and it's hard to say what exactly he does but considering he is a mechanical engineer I think it may have to do with him wanting to have an exact explanation for everything he does and with CTE, at this point, you just don't have that.
I'm not sure we ever will without having an extremely intelligent Engineer and someone with extensive knowledge or how the brain and eyes perceive things work together with Stan to connect all the dots and frankly I don't need that to know that it works. I realize it's beyond my ability to explain it to all you geniuses so therefor I don't try. I only discuss it at all on here because I respect and appreciate the amount of time and effort that Stan has put into this to bring it to the masses and I have no doubt in the future it will be easier and easier to understand for those of you that want to learn it or doubt it because you just don't get it yet.
Could you elaborate as to why you're saying in person instruction could be required for most?
What did you get in person that you did not get from the DVD or the YouTube Videos?
Thanks in advance,
Rick
I challenge you to learn ghost ball contact patch and train using the arrow.
I was able to get direct feedback to specific questions that I had about the perceptions, body position, bridge position, etc. I think because it is such a big departure from the other aiming systems out there it can be difficult to wrap your head around it without that. I've always been a very hands on learner so it's very difficult for me to watch something on a video and then apply it.
I'm a bit different than a lot of CTE/Pro 1 users on here I think because I learned the system through instruction prior to ever watching the dvd's and frankly I don't think I would be using it today if it weren't for that. Although the dvd's make it seem very complex in reality it is quite simple and within an hour of working with Stevie I was picking up the perceptions. The 3 others in the clinic took a bit longer but they had the "aha" moment within 30 minutes of me. I've seen a few players (especially low ranked) have that moment where it clicks and it's pretty funny seeing someone at that very moment they realize how it works and think to themselves "I wish I would have learned this years ago."
I'm not sure if that's the clarification you are looking for...
I have the CTE Pro One DVD's and me and my friend Russell watched them several times from begining to end and still can not figure out how to use CTE. I just want to look at the ball and know exactly where to hit it. No where in the CTE DVD does it tell me how to do that.
I am the OP and after many months CTE still makes no sense to me...
Thanks for the reply.
You would be different than most then, in that you learned before ever even seeing the DVD.
Can you tell me/us what if anything in the system differentiates one shot from another when using the same visual & pivot/sweep?
Thanks again in advance,
Rick