any one know why the cheating thread vot pulled ?

lorider

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
After I got home from league about 11:30 last night I posted in that thread. This morning at 7:00 I looked fo see I'd the op replied to my post. It's gone .

It seems it must have gotten nasty real quick over night

Dang ..i was hoping to see if she replied fo my 2 questions. Real curious what her answers would have been
 
The lady who originally posted was obviously very upset. As there was a lot of bitterness and anger, perhaps the thread was pulled before things got out of hand and something written that might later be regretted.
 
What were your two questions?

1 what tournament rule of rules did far is violate ?

2 what type of behavior did Garcia display during the match that was unsportsmanlike ?


I never saw any thing in any of her posts that provided why she labeled him a cheater of how he was unsportsmanlike. Did you /
 
The post reminded me of when I was a teacher and a parent would come in with all kinds of complaints and criticisms about how her little flower was being treated unfairly. Although I've dealt with a lot of helicopter parents, but this was the first time I ever saw a helicopter wife.

I'd guess her hubby got a whiff of it and deleted it. It is bad enough when your mommy does that, but your wife??
 
The post reminded me of when I was a teacher and a parent would come in with all kinds of complaints and criticisms about how her little flower was being treated unfairly. Although I've dealt with a lot of helicopter parents, but this was the first time I ever saw a helicopter wife.

I'd guess her hubby got a whiff of it and deleted it. It is bad enough when your mommy does that, but your wife??

Only mods can delete a thread. We can do in and edit our posts, but we cannot delete a thread.

Something happened to cause them to decide to do so.
 
1 what tournament rule of rules did far is violate ?

2 what type of behavior did Garcia display during the match that was unsportsmanlike ?


I never saw any thing in any of her posts that provided why she labeled him a cheater of how he was unsportsmanlike. Did you /
Jag racking and would not fix it.
 
Jag racking and would not fix it.

She stated...due to the condition of the balls and the table you could not get a tight rack.


How I that jag racking ? Her husband went out fo his vehicle and brought in a magic rack that Garcia recused fo use. That is not cheating or un sportsmanlike in my book
 
Last edited:
I almost broke my fingers to keep from replying to that thread. My opinion would not have been agreeable to the OP. I'll just leave it at that.
 
After I got home from league about 11:30 last night I posted in that thread. This morning at 7:00 I looked fo see I'd the op replied to my post. It's gone .

It seems it must have gotten nasty real quick over night

Dang ..i was hoping to see if she replied fo my 2 questions. Real curious what her answers would have been

This is all I can find that google cached. Check it quick because it might not be up long:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:2bjlGYp6M8MJ:forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php%3Fp%3D5494205+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
 
That was quite a read. What I don't get is if that table and loose racking was the only way Joe could win, how did he beat bob a couple weeks earlier on a table chosen by Bob?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
That was quite a read. What I don't get is if that table and loose racking was the only way Joe could win, how did he beat bob a couple weeks earlier on a table chosen by Bob?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly. Seems to me she was pretty upset be did not win that dog tag back. Maybe if turned her on seeing the name " beast " hanging around her husbands neck
 
It must vot of been very good.

I am sorry, I could vot help myself.

...have...
Not "...of..."

Couldn't help my self either.
I guess that's reason enough to post.
As long as I say I can't help myself I should be okay
 
Last edited:
Geeze, I guess the grapes were so sour, even AZ had to spit them out. Sour grapes make the best whine.
 
I am sure it was pulled because the rant named names. I am sure that from a legal standpoint, it may have well been considered libel and the forum moderators will not allow anything close to libel as the site could potentially be held liable in a suit. Even this thread is probably bordering on being pulled as it is reminiscing on the former thread with names named.

If you want to b***h about something, that is fine and understandable, but be vague and anonymous, otherwise, it will be yanked and rightly so.
 
I am sure it was pulled because the rant named names. I am sure that from a legal standpoint, it may have well been considered libel and the forum moderators will not allow anything close to libel as the site could potentially be held liable in a suit. Even this thread is probably bordering on being pulled as it is reminiscing on the former thread with names named.

If you want to b***h about something, that is fine and understandable, but be vague and anonymous, otherwise, it will be yanked and rightly so.

I disagree. I don't think anything she wrote was that bad.
 
Back
Top