Grady had enough shafts to stake out a large tomato patch![]()
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So did Babe Cranfield.
Grady had enough shafts to stake out a large tomato patch![]()
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
pt109......yes, I do own more than one cue and I have them listed in my Az signature.
There are eight cues in my collection and there'd be more were it not for CA's ivory ban.
I transport six cues in my cue case & all the cues have flat ivory joints & big pin threads.
Four (4) of the six (6) cues were custom built with identical specs including the butts & shafts.
These cues weigh 18.5 -18.6 ozs whereas my Scrugs & Prewitt cues weigh 18.35 & 18.75 ozs.
The tips on the Owen cues and Rauenzahn cues are all Kamui Black Clear (soft) and the tips
on the Scruggs & Prewitt cues are Kamui Black (med) & original Moori Brown (med). And the
shafts on these six cues are all 12.75 - 13.0 mm and weigh 3.85 ozs to 4.2 ozs.
My collection was built around the cues all being closely matched in specs so that changing cues
would not only be easier but virtually seamless in almost every aspect. Of course that isn't always
the case since I do have a few favorites but I think it's based more on the design of the cue than feel.
Anyway, back to my original point.........it is more beneficial to play with a single cue, or cues really
very close in specifications, so that the cue's weight proportionality, hit, vibration and overall tactile
feel in your gripping fingers remains the same, or close, on a variety of shots & stroke velocities used.
This is my personal belief and I've found that when I change cues, there's hardly any difference in
the way the cue feels in my hands. This is likley why I never found a Hercek cue I searched in vain
since the cue had to fall within the specs of the other ivory joint cues already in my small collection.
I think better players are less bothered by the differences in the cue they are playing with and sadly,
either due to my inability to focus or my skills, I'm not one of them since I find it more of a distraction.
Matt B.
Only one cue........ Well, OK...
Last night I struck up a conversation with a higher level player s/l 7/8. I am a 5/5. My question was concerning should s/l 4's play with ld shafts. He replied nothing wrong with it as long as they played with the same cue all the time and got used to its characteristics. I replied that I could see the validity of the statement but that I had a habit of changing cues quite often.
He looked at me in disbelief and asked .. Why ?? I replied I liked variety :smile:. He replied that I would be more consistent and therefore shoot better if I used the same cue all the time and asked what cues I shot er. I replied a meucci with a black dot shaft and a kamui clear soft tip... A mc Dermott with a g core shaft which I was shooting with that night... An Adams / helmstetter. He shook his head. I replied I just switched fro. The meucci to the mc Dermott Las month and since then have beat an 8 by 18-2...beat a 6 by 15-5. Went undefeated in last weeks 8 ball tri cups ...won my match last night against another 5 and was up 31-16 at one point. I said it did not seem to affect my level of play changing cues every month.
Then again...would I really play better if I strictly played with nothing but this mc Dermott all the time ?
I think playing with different cues....just like playing on different tables makes you an all around better player.
Heck.. One night I was playing bad and was down 2-0 vs a 7 in 8 ball. I started shooting with my breaker.. Bk 3 ...amd won 3 in a row to win the match .
Well of course he is right about familiarity and consistency (with one cue)
Indian not the arrow as always
-greyghost
Sounds like you're contradicting yourself by saying one cue is best for familiarity and consistency and then "it's the INDIAN not the arrow as always".
If ONE CUE is best it's the specific arrow you're promoting. If it's the INDIAN, he could own and play with 20 and it wouldn't matter.
It a combination of both the Indian AND the arrow as always.
Sure does doesn’t it. But it ain’t, as I’m only talking about it mentally. Having something that fits perfect is one thing but being codependent with it mentally to be able to win is another thing entirely.....
I was a golfer before I walked into a poolhall....had 14 clubs in my bag.
...so by the time I was a serious player, I had six cues...
...they all made sense to me ‘cause conditions change.
I had light and heavy pool cues 18.5 and 20.25 for fast and slow cloths
...heavy and light snooker cues for fast and slow cloths...16.75 and 18.5
...a carom cue
...a break cue
Indians need different arrows some times
The impression made in your post was physical, not mental. Each and every cue does in fact perform differently in the hands of players. So there is a lot to do with the arrow and what Indian is using it. They could be heaven, hell, or purgatory. Depends who is using it.
You said this in another post: "I’ll never be that codependent ever again but in due time I’ll find the proper matching tonal old hard maple I need" So do you not want to be codependent with a cue or very codependent as in 'one with the cue'.
I really don't know where you're coming from but it sounds like another contradiction.
Or I just don't understand you. Now I see why you and Paultex got along so well.
I nor anyone else could understand him but you could.