I take exception to the "money-hungry" part. These guys wouldn't be in pool if that was a primary trait. 98% of them are paupers and even if they become #1, they will still make less than 1/10th the bucks the top 20 guys at every decent Wall St firm make.
There are only 4 guys on the money list who make more than the average salaried slob in the USA and if you consider expenses there is probably only one-barely. I'm not here to shout this is so unfair etc-just to point out that most pros are hoping to just eek out a living doing something they love and being money hungry plays no part. Once they are in the pro game, they are desperate for money is perhaps a fair statement.
It’s possible to be both money-hungry and money-stupid.
Pockets too huge, many roll-offs and weird inconsistent reactions off the rails to my eye. Plus they just looked like they are poorly made and not real solid. I suppose they could be solid and just look flimsy.
Didn't they change ball sets 2x during a match-meaning they tried 3 different ball sets during one match? That may or may not have been a misguided effort to correct abnormalities of the table but in ANY EVENT, it indicates that having top-shelf equipment was not a priority at the tournament start.
Here is a video of the final match (joined in progress):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jI681wG5jAk
As for Shaw's complaints, should a player keep his mouth shut if he feels that things aren't being done properly? If there are gaps in the rack, it makes a huge difference at nine ball. I thought everyone knew that by now. He's playing for real money -- the difference between $40,000 and $20,000. If he sees gaps that hurt his chances is he supposed to just suck it up and hit the balls a little harder? The real problem is that they're playing nine ball. (Where's Paul S. when you need him?)
Service not available
On my Firefox or safari
Canucks ain’t gettin’ no respect these days
No, I was responding to several other comments above.If i somehow gave you the impression that I thought Shaw was wrong, that certainly wasn't my intention. ...
It is not new. If you're ever going to be at tournament I'm going to, remind me to bring my very remarkable Cyclop 3 ball. There was a video of a player lagging (Hohmann?) a diamond from side rail. He scratched. It was not the table's fault.... Out-of-round?? Skidding is one thing but lopsided? That's a new one. ...
Just curious here. I watched some qualifying and about 4-5 tournament matches. What did you see that gave the impression that these tables were so bad? Not trying to start a flame-out but i didn't see any glaring table problems. A lot of events are played on STAR's and generally are well liked.
I did not get a chance to watch any of the matches . Can any one tell me who besides Shaw complained about the racking....or the tables if any ?
I did not get a chance to watch any of the matches . Can any one tell me who besides Shaw complained about the racking....or the tables if any ?
I did not get a chance to watch any of the matches . Can any one tell me who besides Shaw complained about the racking....or the tables if any ?
You call them STARS which you have heard of and, Bob calls them XING PAI Brand he has never heard of. Are we all taking about the same table ?
I'm too lazy to look it up, but how did Shane do and also did Filler play as well?
Thanks for the translation. I was going by a label I saw on the table in the game Oi ran out to win a match in the early rounds:Xing Pai (星牌) literally means Star(s) brand, but I think there's more than one Star brand of billiard tables out there
Bejing XingweiSports is parent co. XingPai-STAR is their table line. https://xingpaibilliard.en.china.cn/about.htmlXing Pai (星牌) literally means Star(s) brand, but I think there's more than one Star brand of billiard tables out there