Jay, the deviation of the cue ball doesn't prove it was touched..if you go into a rail with
top spin, it becomes draw coming back...we all know how to make a ball and stop
the cue ball with a top hit...this is what happens on Shane's hit.
Here's Dr Dave showing that effect....
http://billiards.colostate.edu/high_speed_videos/HSV4-3.htm
I wouldn't bet my life that the cue ball wasn't touched, but the ball curving once it
settles down and grabs the cloth is a normal reaction.
With all dues respect, the shot you showed by Dr. Dave is a much different shot than the one Shane made, and proves nothing. I will stick to my original call - Shane fouled!
It's a different shot, but the same effect.
It's why certain shots at billiards have to be hit below center....
...because top spin becomes back spin when you hit a rail straight, or close to straight.
It's a different shot, but the same effect.
It's why certain shots at billiards have to be hit below center....
...because top spin becomes back spin when you hit a rail straight, or close to straight.
You can watch the cueball deviate the moment it reaches his cue. Not even hard to see imo. Watch the cueball only, forget about shane and the rake. As you track up, you can see the ball continue on a different path. 100% foul imo.
I really loved what thorsten said about himself a few years back, on his way to winning another major straight pool championship.
He had called a foul on himself that nobody else noticed. Ref included.
Asked later about his honesty he said and i paraphrase well you didn't call me honest for not robbing a bank that I didn't rob.
Shane said no foul but if it was he would of called it on himself.Seriously? You say a comment was made but don't say what the comment was?
Seriously?
Shane said no foul but if it was he would of called it on himself.
Kaci made a thread about it on Facebook after somebody sent him the video but he didn't complain and no sour grapes on his part, he gave Shane congrats on the win.
And said he respects SVB and thinks Shane would of called it on himself if he knew it was bad.
I think Kaci ended up deleting the thread because some of the comments got out of hand Karl Boyes said it was a foul and said Americans players are known for cheating basically calling Shane a cheater
PS After maybe 1000's of comments on Facebook about the shot, it seemed like it was a pretty even split on foul and no foul.
After watching the shot over and over my personal opinion is you just can't tell for sure and that is after watching in slow motion on a big screen frame after frame.Shane was deep in the US Open, playing Corey Duel and he called a foul on himself that no one else saw. I don't know anyone who is more honest playing pool, I would be willing to wager that Shane doesn't believe he fouled or he would of called it.
Some of Euros players comments were way out of line IMOIt was definitely a foul. Before I read Jay H.'s comment, I saw the same thing. The ball went in a different direction after it hit. Jay is absolutely correct.
That said, I don't believe Shane was aware of it. When you're in the heat of the battle, some things go unnoticed. You're concentrated so hard on the game at hand.
Thank goodness, Klenti and Shane have admiration and respect for each other. I am disappointed to read Melling's comments. I could throw a few out there about the inebriated Boxing Brits, but I'll save them for another time.![]()