Siming Chen vs Donny Mills

It seem's like JL Chang's fargo went up, maybe the big foot challenge games are entered into Fargo.
Also, Filler winning the money match vs JL Chang.

Sure-All matches were streamed and the scores readily available.
 
Truth hurts. Which is why you resort to ad hominem.



Thanks for conceding.









Yes, settled.



The only alternative to what I state is the position that women's pool is delayed, and that at some point it will equal men's. That is what anyone is saying when they reject the idea that men play an inherently stronger game, and that's how it will be.



Let's go back in time and put some context to this. At the time, we were seeing the collapse of men's pool, and we were seeing a super star Allison Fisher play a level of pool not seen before by the ladies. Dominating them. Didn't matter what pool room you were in, there was always people who saw this phenomenon and believed that she and others could play even with the men. They were convinced because of her excellent fundamentals and run outs. As a side note, notice how the same thing is happening with Chen. People citing her form, fundamentals and such to form their conclusions. Well, sorry but most of you don't qualify to be able to make skill determinations based on visual assessment due to your own lower skill level.



Anyway ....



It became a little bit annoying to listen to all these delusional people for years and years make these ludicrous claims. Then lo and behold, the IPT came around. Open format, and big money up for grabs. All the ladies were invited. They all got demolished. And yes, it was ugly to watch. I watched most of their matches. It wasn't easy to watch them struggle. It's all about contrast. Up against one another, it became most obvious. You have killers like Manalo running 6 packs on pro-cut diamonds with that garbage carpet gorina cloth...then you have the ladies who can barely run out ever. It was dismal. Safety and kicking battles? Not even close. Breaks, not in the same universe. Run out percentage uhh....



Yes, that was 13 years ago. The women are better today, but so are the men! See how that works? One groups doesn't advance while the other comes to a complete standstill.





Now....there are and can be fluctuations between the groups. For example, women's pool over the last 25+ years has been in a better place then men's pool. They have had a better, more structured and organized tour with more consistent sponsorship and a steady and loyal fan base. Thus, they have been on the rise. It is very evident when comparing the level of play from the late 1990's to today.



On the other hand, it can be argued that men's pool is a bit lower today than where it could and should be, due to the dismal state the game is in. That is, proportionately to the growth of the economy, the global scene, media and the such. In other words, pool's "market share" has shrunk. They are a little lower on the trajectory predicted by the level of play in the 1980's to the 1990's and so forth.



In the 2000's we saw a sizeable exodus of extremely talented male pros from the game. Rather than being highly active touring pros, many went to part-time play and some even left the game for a while to do other things. The money just isn't there. This is terribly demoralizing and depressing. Players are not investing the same amount of energy and time.



Meanwhile, women's pool has been growing and the women players are on average more dedicated.





All that said, the women have closed the gap a little. But it is still a canyon between them. And, they will never have parity with the men. Simply because of the realities of nature. Even in a non-athletic competition such as chess, women cannot compete with the men. It really doesn't matter what you choose, men out perform women. This isn't misogyny, or chauvinism. Just facts.



Therefore, the experiment we saw in 2006 stands. Have another mixed tournament in 2030 if you want, one group may do a little better or worse than the last time, but the overwhelming reality will be that men will dominate the tournament.



I know, this hurts some of you people's precious feelings. I come across as some guy who just told children that Santa isn't real. Get over it.

Yeah, and what were the Fargo ratings of those women that played in the IPT tournament? The reason I ask is because the top Asian women have nearly a 100 point higher rating than the top USA Woman players. I don't recall seeing the top Asian women at the IPT tournament I attended in Vegas.


_______
 
Jason: you really think in 2030 if there is a mixed tournament like Grilled Cheese suggests of the top players from each sex, that the men will not dominate?
 
Poolnoob: I believe Roy put set 1 on his FB page for free after the paid live stream was over. Idk if it’s still there, and/or the replay status of set 2.
 
Terry: awesome Siming is in the US Open! Is this a new development? I recall reading the full list before and her name was absent.
 
Barton: I took your bet. Thanks for the action. I’m closed now. I’ll update that thread with current rankings once per year or so.
 
Poolnoob: I believe Roy put set 1 on his FB page for free after the paid live stream was over. Idk if it’s still there, and/or the replay status of set 2.
Could find it. Possible to post up the link if you happen to come across it again? Appreciate it

Sent from my SGP621 using Tapatalk
 
I think terry might be the best bet for the link. I don’t have a fb account and can only watch if someone gives a direct link. It is buried in this thread somewhere!
 
Oh one last I forgot who asked me I think Jason.... I rate Schmidt higher than Mills. I think he doesn’t care much for tournaments and probably doesn’t practice. But if he’s heading into a big match or straight pool competition he will be in stroke. That’s why I bet on him to beat Corey in their tar match and he did. I think he’d be in top form if match was set up between him and Siming, he’d win, and he’d perform higher than his Fargo. But, I’d only bet on him with odds because you’d give odds and that’s how betting lines work:)
 
So are DCC matches entered into Fargo?

I read an old posting by Donny not being happy about it. Not sure what the current status is on that?

DCC has not yet been able to handle the logistics of getting match scores reported and recorded. We have been entering the match as 1-0, essentially saying we know the score of the last game by knowing the match winner.

Donny had a lopsided win against Orcollo and so wanted his specific match score entered. This sounds reasonable. He knew that and other match scores of his. But it is our policy to enter only disinterested data, that is, data that is not coming to us BECAUSE of its content. One way to insure this is to make the decision to enter it before the match is played. Another way is to enter an entire tournament or none of the tournament.
 
One other point, although Chen has great form, stroke, and fundamentals, I believe that these things have translated into real skills that have resulted in her high Fargo Rating.

For anyone that watched the sets with Donny, can anyone name anything that Donny was superior in? Ball pocketing, the break, cue ball control, safeties, patterns?

I think that a lot of people thought that Donny's break would be far superior. The first set it didn't turn out that way and the second two sets, while his break was better, it wasn't far better. In everything else, I say that Chen has the edge, even though I will admit that her safety play was not very stellar in the last two sets.
 
Last edited:
can anyone name anything that Donny was superior in? Ball pocketing, the break, cue ball control, safeties, patterns?

I think that a lot of people thought that Donny's break would be far superior. The first set it didn't turn out that way and the second two sets, while his break was better, it wasn't far better. In everything else, I say that Chen has the edge, even though I will admit that her safety play was not very stellar in the last two sets.

So far the stats show Donny's break being definitely better, and at their level that's often enough.
Late in the 2nd set, he had a streak of like 6 games in a row, and he was popping in the wing ball
on every break. If he'd had it working like that throughout the set it'd be tough to beat.

Arguably Donny plays closer cue ball position. I say "closer" but I dunno if I could say "better".
She leans hard on her shotmaking and seems content to leave long shots and thin cuts
rather than take any kind of risk with the cue ball.

For example in the final rack, she did this with a hanger 4 ball. I just couldn't do it.

22xdytG.png


I can't settle that hard on the 6. That's a missable ball for me.
There are like 3 other things I'd try before I just rolled it in like that.

So yeah, I give her the edge in tough shotmaking, and making clutch shots in some of the important racks,
like the ones that stop his momentum and let her get on the hill. She made a couple of great banks,
and she had fewer of those "out of nowhere" misses where it isn't a tough shot, the player just took their eyes off the ball for a second.
 
Last edited:
Could find it. Possible to post up the link if you happen to come across it again? Appreciate it

Sent from my SGP621 using Tapatalk


I checked and he doesn't have either set up on Roy's Page.

Look up First Break Bar & Grill and on their page, there's a video of the end of the match
when the score was 19-19. But it's kind of far away and hard to see.

I believe high rock recorded the video and I've been trying to contact them,
to see if they'll be putting it up anywhere.
 
So far the stats show Donny's break being definitely better, and at their level that's often enough.
Late in the 2nd set, he had a streak of like 6 games in a row, and he was popping in the wing ball
on every break. If he'd had it working like that throughout the set it'd be tough to beat.

Arguably Donny plays closer cue ball position. I say "closer" but I dunno if I could say "better".
She leans hard on her shotmaking and seems content to leave long shots and thin cuts
rather than take any kind of risk with the cue ball.

For example in the final rack, she did this with a hanger 4 ball. I just couldn't do it.

22xdytG.png


I can't settle that hard on the 6. That's a missable ball for me.
There are like 3 other things I'd try before I just rolled it in like that.

So yeah, I give her the edge in tough shotmaking, and making clutch shots in some of the important racks,
like the ones that stop his momentum and let her get on the hill. She made a couple of great banks,
and she had fewer of those "out of nowhere" misses where it isn't a tough shot, the player just took their eyes off the ball for a second.

I just realized, I believe the first time they played it was 10 ball where their breaks were about even. So Donny probably does have a better 9 ball break.




_______
 
Check AtLarge stats thread for set 2

Chen 57% successfull break
Donny 70%

Chen 24% 5/21 BNR on all breaks
Donny 40% 8/20

57% successful break playing winner breaks almost cost her the set. Against higher level pros, she would not stand a chance breaking like that playing winner breaks
 
Check AtLarge stats thread for set 2

Chen 57% successfull break
Donny 70%

Chen 24% 5/21 BNR on all breaks
Donny 40% 8/20

57% successful break playing winner breaks almost cost her the set. Against higher level pros, she would not stand a chance breaking like that playing winner breaks

and still she beat him- When she learns the racking secrets for 9 on the spot and other conditions, she is going to be pretty tough for anyone. She breaks as hard as most pros.

It also seems true what the commentators said- She plays much better when things get tight. She gets lazy as a front-runner!
 
Last edited:
It's all about the numbers, of course. What folks seem to be forgetting in this argument, is that there is such a substantially larger number of men playing pool, that until that number starts to get close to balanced, there will very likely always be men performing at a higher level than women...just because of the sheer number of men developing their potential.

It is pretty cool to see more and more ladies showing at up the higher levels tho.

I do wonder why more ladies aren't entering the US Open, since that change was made years ago. Hopefully just scheduling conflicts with other tournaments.
 
It's all about the numbers, of course. What folks seem to be forgetting in this argument, is that there is such a substantially larger number of men playing pool, that until that number starts to get close to balanced, there will very likely always be men performing at a higher level than women...just because of the sheer number of men developing their potential.

It is pretty cool to see more and more ladies showing at up the higher levels tho.

I do wonder why more ladies aren't entering the US Open, since that change was made years ago. Hopefully just scheduling conflicts with other tournaments.

$1000 entry to be dead money. Highest US women fargo is 687.
 
Back
Top