There is a sort of irony that the buyers of a jackpot, who actually bought the cue without pictures or any description, would now have to send the seller pics to not be considered suspect.
If Dean could definitively say who it was., then of course name them, but if it's between two or more users, I'd keep it to myself.
i appreciate the sincere concern,and i have felt like an idiot
but once i paid Don,I felt like I was the only one who could lose
and a peace came to me
I still feel bad,but it is not in my hands.So why worry
Lets wait and see what happens
Likewise, I am sure Dean will be able to narrow it down to one person given the situation.Well, from what info Dean has given, the only way to know for sure is if "all" of the buyers send proof of which cue they recieved. If two or more don't provide proof, well, as you stated, it could be any one of them.
The longer this thread gets, ths more I feel that Deano is out of luck.
My fingers are still crossed that who ever has it will do the right thing but, tic-toc-tic-toc...
Jeff
Dean,
I know you really don't want to out anyone but, if you think about it sir, the only type people that are worried about being outed are people that have something to hide.
If within the next few days, your not made whole...I would think about it.
Like I said before, you would be doing AZB a favor by letting us know there was a crooked buyer/seller among us.
Again, only the guilty would mind being mentioned in such a situation.
As a matter of fact, if I was one of the buyers, I would post pics of the cue I purchased with the proof of purchase. Anyone thats not willing to do that is suspect IMO.
Jeff
I am one of the folks who ordered a Jackpot cue. I was out of town when it arrived. I got home over the weekend and received my cue.
It was the cue I had discussed with Dean. Plain Jane. No rings. Exactly as described.
I sent my pics to Dean. I put the new cue beside a couple of other cues. I was disappointed not to receive the Tascarella so I could return it.
Yikes, I don't think someone purchasing a cue in a private transaction is obligated to show up in an online forum and post anything about what he or she received and I wouldn't judge someone as "suspect" for not doing that.
This is between a seller and a buyer (if he really sent the wrong cue, etc., etc.) and I'm assuming he did for purposes of this answer. Really not something to be rallying behind or making accusations about.
I am one of the folks who ordered a Jackpot cue. I was out of town when it arrived. I got home over the weekend and received my cue.
It was the cue I had discussed with Dean. Plain Jane. No rings. Exactly as described.
I sent my pics to Dean. I put the new cue beside a couple of other cues. I was disappointed not to receive the Tascarella so I could return it.
Likewise, I am sure Dean will be able to narrow it down to one person given the situation.
I think the type of person to buy a cue unseen with no description, might be the kind not to rush opening the box. But I think things will work out in the end. Plus the name if the cue, ja
"Jackpot", its like the name "lottery ticket", maybe they saw the tasc, and thought they hit the literal jackpotnot realizing. I personally never seen a jackpot cue.
Well, if I was one of the people that bought a cue....I wouldn't think twice about sending Deano a pic.
You have your opinion...I have mine.
Have a good day sir,
Jeff
a jackpot is an ebony merry widow with a wrapless maple area
nothing like the tascarellacue pictured with tascarella signature
Trying to defend whoever has the Tasc?? Sounds like it. NO way the guy doesn't know what he has. Anybody that's been on here for any time at all knows what a Tascarella is. I hope Deano makes a list of some of the posters on this and never sells them anything ever. Must be nice to have never made a mistake.Pretty sure Tascarella has made a merry widow or two.
To the uninitiated the signature might not mean anything.
Lou Figueroa