CTE Does NOT Work - It Did For One Pro

Game over. There’s not one single instructor in the world that can’t easily wrap their mind around my explanations to your concern to include all PBIA master instructors, Mark Wilson and Jerry Briesath. I understand the topic matter and the proof is in the pudding.

Stan Shuffett

I think you are having a Joe Biden moment. What you are saying is gibberish and everyone, even your supporters here, can surely see that. You are giving non answers and then are turning the conversation around and saying that I just don't understand your brilliant explanation.

Hal would be proud, I'm sure.
 
i call it magic, only problem i have is sometimes it works and sometimes it don't

both ends of the spectrum are frightening, the more i played the less i encountered the poor side of the spectrum

Normal. It will all come together.

Stan Shuffett
 
I think you are having a Joe Biden moment. What you are saying is gibberish and everyone, even your supporters here, can surely see that. You are giving non answers and then are turning the conversation around and saying that I just don't understand your brilliant explanation.

Hal would be proud, I'm sure.

Perhaps some viewers will chime in. I have indulged your elementary concerns and I believe that you’re taking waaaay way the worst of it.

We’re working with an inside A that you couldn’t explain and align to properly to save your life.

Stan Shuffett
 
Ok, so that's right there in the ballpark where CIT has its largest effect on the shot.... probably why he qualified the 15 inside.

Regardless, the balls are easily made as I described...one of the biggest no-brainers that I have ever debated.

Stan Shuffett
 
i call it magic, only problem i have is sometimes it works and sometimes it don't

both ends of the spectrum are frightening, the more i played the less i encountered the poor side of the spectrum

I agree. Its hard to make that kinda magic.

One time I was playing a set to with a guy. Race to 7 for a little change. I win 7 to 0. The guy's say to me ..that was some good shooting, I only shot twice the entire set.


Crazy thing ..I couldn't remember one shot except the last ball. Thats subconscious at its finest ..;)
 
Yeah, this doesn't even answer the question of when the book or the TS comes out. Seriously, just a date would be nice.

I gave you everything I know. My material is NOW in design. Finally, it will go to a printing services. I can’t give something out that I don’t know.

Stan Shuffett
 
I agree. Its hard to make that kinda magic.

One time I was playing a set to with a guy. Race to 7 for a little change. I win 7 to 0. The guy's say to me ..that was some good shooting, I only shot twice the entire set.


Crazy thing ..I couldn't remember one shot except the last ball. Thats subconscious at its finest ..;)

Sports psychology research does show that athletes perform perform best when they are not trying so hard, consciously, to perform their best.
 
I agree. Its hard to make that kinda magic.

One time I was playing a set to with a guy. Race to 7 for a little change. I win 7 to 0. The guy's say to me ..that was some good shooting, I only shot twice the entire set.


Crazy thing ..I couldn't remember one shot except the last ball. Thats subconscious at its finest ..;)

No doubt, but that does not mean that some of the underpinnings of our subconscious mind can’t be explained for what occurring that we’re not aware of.

Good shooting!

Stan Shuffett
 
I think what Dan is saying is that the difference in the CIT angle between a rolling cb hit and a stun cb hit is greater than the allowable margin for error at the pocket opening.

Like in this video, https://youtu.be/ERJ-bZJTGfE, you hit the same setup a few times with a rolling cb hit and a couple of times with a stun shot, all into a 3.25 inch pocket. The margin of error is less than +/- 1°, based on the ob's distance to the pocket with a 3.25 inch pocket opening.

But the CIT of a rolling cb at this angle (or a cb with top or bottom on it) is easily 2° less than the CIT that occurs with the same setup when a stun shot is used at this angle. So I think Dan is asking how it's possible that the stun shot and the rolling cb shot, which produce two different shot angles more than 2° apart, can both hit a pocket that only permits 1° of variance from center pocket.

With a center table shot (ob farther from the pocket) the difference would be even more noticeable. Are you using the exact same perception each time with no side spin on the cb?

I was trying to keep it as simple as possible to avoid deflections into unrelated areas. It didn't work.
 
Perhaps some viewers will chime in. I have indulged your elementary concerns and I believe that you’re taking waaaay way the worst of it.

We’re working with an inside A that you couldn’t explain and align to properly to save your life.

Stan Shuffett

Yes, cookie, Spider, Scarlett, Low Blow 500, Gerry anybody else? Please explain the answer to me. Stan seems to be having trouble getting through and I guess it makes me look silly. Lou, Brian, mk, 8pack, etc etc can you translate?
 
I gave you everything I know. My material is NOW in design. Finally, it will go to a printing services. I can’t give something out that I don’t know.

Stan Shuffett

Mkindsv: Stan apparently isn't aware of this invention called the telephone. You can call them up and ask them for an estimated completion date. Even if they just say, "second half of the year or maybe first quarter next year" it's better than nothing.
 
Mkindsv: Stan apparently isn't aware of this invention called the telephone. You can call them up and ask them for an estimated completion date. Even if they just say, "second half of the year or maybe first quarter next year" it's better than nothing.

I asked early on in the process about a date. They truly don’t know and do not care to make guesses. It was explained to me on the day that I handed my material in that it was like giving birth to a baby in that my book would not be born until it’s ready.

I have tried to be informative with you over the past day or so. There’s nothing that I have said or presented that suits you. I’ve jumped through hoops for you and as I indicated my answers would pass with flying colors for anyone that’s anybody in the instructional field.


Stan Shuffett
 
I asked early on in the process about a date. They truly don’t know and do not care to make guesses. It was explained to me on the day that I handed my material in that it was like giving birth to a baby in that my book would not be born until it’s ready.

I have tried to be informative with you over the past day or so. There’s nothing that I have said or presented that suits you. I’ve jumped through hoops for you and as I indicated my answers would pass with flying colors for anyone that’s anybody in the instructional field.


Stan Shuffett

Maybe you should fire them
 
I asked early on in the process about a date. They truly don’t know and do not care to make guesses. It was explained to me on the day that I handed my material in that it was like giving birth to a baby in that my book would not be born until it’s ready.

I have tried to be informative with you over the past day or so. There’s nothing that I have said or presented that suits you. I’ve jumped through hoops for you and as I indicated my answers would pass with flying colors for anyone that’s anybody in the instructional field.


Stan Shuffett

If you have a bonafide publisher that is telling you they won't give you a date that is odd, but OK. At least it is a straight forward answer. How about calling them up and saying, "Hi guys. I gave you my book over a year ago. Any approximate time frame?"

As to your other "answer" it was lacking, to say the least. You've already hinted that you want someone else to explain it to me. Maybe you can get Spider or cookie to help with that.
 
I have tried to be informative with you over the past day or so. There’s nothing that I have said or presented that suits you. I’ve jumped through hoops for you and as I indicated my answers would pass with flying colors for anyone that’s anybody in the instructional field.


Stan Shuffett

Yes, this makes sense. You have a long history of blaming the student when they don't understand your pearls of wisdom. I guess in a classroom little kids can't challenge the teacher, but this is a discussion forum and you'd think after so many years you'd become accustomed to other adults not being so easily swayed. "Because I say so" doesn't fly here.
 
If you have a bonafide publisher that is telling you they won't give you a date that is odd, but OK. At least it is a straight forward answer. How about calling them up and saying, "Hi guys. I gave you my book over a year ago. Any approximate time frame?"

As to your other "answer" it was lacking, to say the least. You've already hinted that you want someone else to explain it to me. Maybe you can get Spider or cookie to help with that.

Frankly, my business dealings shouldn’t concern you. There’ll be a point that I will address respectfulness and sincerity only. I don’t have the time for foolishness.

Stan Shuffett
 
Last edited:
Back
Top