Some
You should be honored, not many go back n forth with ol dan for long before getting the ignore hammer
You should be honored, not many go back n forth with ol dan for long before getting the ignore hammer
Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
- Thread starter Dan Harriman
- Start date
- Status
DOUBTED IT.
Those who have seen it know your DOUBT about the whole vid is inaccurate and unfounded.
And now you have charles 'danny' Harriman's cheer of agreement. That should tell you something...which is not good.
and yes, the are all in it raking in the cash behind the smokey mirrors and laughing there asses off at all of us
So again, whether a person or robot has a personal account is futile. This is a simple yes or no question as I was not referencing all social media i.e. (twitter, youtube, the silk road, azBilliards). I will ask a very simple question - yet once again justadub as U never answered the first one truthfully, do you think Facebook is a trusted or reliable news source?
Last edited:
Sometimes yes, sometimes no.
Do you think everything on Facebook is either a lie or is everything on Facebook the truth?
I'll ask you again:
what proof of 626 improprieties do you have?
None of us has insisted that j.s. could not accomplish a run of that numerical value, we are only asking to see unedited proof - that after two years - has not been available? Not calling Nick and Mark fibber's here either, only noting that they both seem to have business interests surrounding the claim and the general public is not being allowed to see this great accomplishment 'wow what a hidden secret'. I see Mark likes to play poker over at ameristar - he is probly well funded and I am sure he plays poker well. The first Predator cues were made with Falcon butts, last time I checked Nick and Falcon were a bit joined at the hip. Funny thing about trying to sweep history under the rug, it leaves a ugly bump in the rug this allows little rodents to crawl under and hide. Honest people will eventually trip over the protruding object - the rug will tear as well - where the rug once really tied the room together - before the trash (fake news) was swept under. It has created an ugly bump in the rug, really just an ugly scene for all who try and cover it up. Oh and eventually the rodents get squished - then u have another mess.
Last edited:
Wiggle, wiggle. Your words in this thread speak for themselves, irrespective of what fake news/ yellowish journalism bs you try to put forth.
I don't believe that Facebook is a "news source", per se. All it does is repeat what others post, or link to other sources outside of its footprint. So I don't even consider whether its a trusted source of news. You have decide if you trust where that information came from, where it was linked or shared from, when considering trustworthiness.
In so far as personal pages go, you have to have a real reason to mistrust whether posts on that persons page aren't legit. I post things to mine occasionally. That is how many folks, perhaps most folks, use Facebook. Yes, there are people who seem to revel in sharing every imaginable conspiracy theory and junk posts, and share from very unreliable sources. But the average user, its "what did I have for lunch today", or "man, I'm frustrated at work" or any of a thousand personal thoughts and feelings. Regular people, regular Facebook pages, nothing nefarious there. And the only reason we could associate "news" in this instance is Nick pointing out that he went to that event, which, to the pool world, qualifies as "news" but to the world at large, that's simply a guy sharing what he did last weekend with his friends.
So tell me this...do you believe someone has hijacked Nick Varner's personal Facebook page? And to what end? There are virtually no postings there, just the occasional update on where he is going to appear, or commenting on a clinic he participated in. Why would someone go to the effort to hijack his page and not do anything with it? Simply to further this John Schmidt conspiracy? I don't think so.
You just answered it. Bob said it wasn't sped up, Lou made a vague reference to it being so just to drop a hint of conspiracy in the waters. As to why I didn't reply ... you could have looked and seen this is the first time I've logged in since. I have an actual life outside of your meth-fueled delusions that keeps me occupied.
Well, considering I do business with Nick and he said so himself on a phone call. Oh, I know, someone called me from Nick's phone (his number is added to my cell) so when he places orders I know who is calling me. But, sure, someone stole his phone, called me up, and placed the exact same order, for the exact same amount he always orders, and then we bull shitted for a few minutes about mutual interests. And very few folks on the planet could impersonate Nick, his voice is instantly recognizable. Even you know that Danny.
lol, having you on the other side of the issue makes me feel pretty good actually.
Lou Figueroa
I have to say that if I'm ever charged with murder I'm going to ensure my attorney doesn't let some of you on the jury because some of you are a bit quick to judge (while others just don't know how to read).
So first off: can anyone tell me if what was shown was a TED Talk type highlight video, the whole run with editing and narration, or the original raw footage? Was any of it played at high speed?
Second, can anyone tell me how much attention everyone was paying to the video? IOWs, were people going to the bathroom, ordering drinks and food (I thought I saw that there was a two item minimum), eating their chili fries, wandering around and schmoozing, or was everyone sitting there watching every shot?
Last, is anyone here familiar with the works of Damon Runyon?
I can think of more but let's start there : -)
Lou Figueroa
So first off: can anyone tell me if what was shown was a TED Talk type highlight video, the whole run with editing and narration, or the original raw footage? Was any of it played at high speed?
Second, can anyone tell me how much attention everyone was paying to the video? IOWs, were people going to the bathroom, ordering drinks and food (I thought I saw that there was a two item minimum), eating their chili fries, wandering around and schmoozing, or was everyone sitting there watching every shot?
Last, is anyone here familiar with the works of Damon Runyon?
I can think of more but let's start there : -)
Lou Figueroa
Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
If you are not apart of their 'semi public' thats is OK, also if you have a table and practice 14.1 on a regular basis - your opinion is valuable to me. Please note that I do like Westerns - just not the one schmidt, charlie and the bca are TRYING to produce. If yer a member of john's facebook...
forums.azbilliards.com
Under the affluence of inkahol?
The short answer is undoubtedly going to be No. No one was going all Zapruder, doing a forensic analysis on the footage, I fully expect.
Still, I would expect that serious pool people like Mark Wilson and Nick Varner were quite likely paying attention during the showing. We already know that Bob Jewett was indeed watching intently, looking for indications of fouls, as he has stated.
I'm quite sure that John Schmidt, and most of the pool world isn't as worried about pleasing the few of you who expect, nay... DEMAND that they be able to play the video in their home. As if you have a right to it...heh heh.
Cuz its a big conspiracy to pull the wool over the pool worlds eyes. Might be, I suppose. I'll take the word of a respected pool journalist who did in fact watch the whole video. Everything else is internet foolishness.
Danny was speaking of the public showings, one of which Bob attended and said:
"There were basically three modes of playback. Some of it was with voice-over that had been added about a month after the run. The voices included John, Jerry, Doug Desmond (who provided major logistical support and racking during the attempts) and I think Lou Sardo.
During other portions the voice-over was turned off and Jerry and John discussed John's playing history, problems in the section of the run we were watching, and other pool-related stuff.
In the third mode the live narration continued but the video was played at 2X speed to save some time. This was roughly from ball 300 to ball 480. It was returned to normal speed before John passed his previous high run of 490 (on a break shot), the even 500, and numbers 526 and 527. We continued to the end at normal speed."
Lou Figueroa
- Status