Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
- Thread starter Dan Harriman
- Start date
- Status
What happened to hollywood's cancel culture representative - intersection of freedom of speech? Maybe they lost too much capitol. Yer all cuedup - we are waiting for an answer cuedypie of hollywood news.
Danny has a number of personalities, and each of them posts the same stuff over and over again. Some of the personalities delete their posts minutes after making them. For example, his XradarX has been posting in this thread continuously, but you can see he only has 2 messages 'on record', at least right now.
Danny seems to think if he can make an army of personalities, his whole army can allege fraud and conspiracy, and that will make it sound like a groundswell. If he can make that groundswell work, maybe people will stop laughing.
Are these multiple personalities aware of each other? Do they talk to each other? Do they argue among themselves? Does Danny play them in high-stakes 14.1 and bank pool? Maybe if they all ask John Schmidt, he could give them some pointers.
Danny, are you going to compete ever again? Or are your threats and challenges just ....empty?
Last edited:
And I will play him and xraytardx, I shoot between them.I'll play some $10 APA sets with you all day long Danny.
Yes, I think his claim is legit. I haven't seen the video, but have good friends that did. I know you guys have a long standing beef, but again... I think John has a legit claim to the record. It has been viewed, and confirmed, has it not? Tell me, what am I missing here?
John threw chalk at him once.
Apparently you missed me...and that's cool, I guess.
I know that I'm going to regret this, but why not, you'll end up quoting something old from me regardless.
"Chopped", to me, would mean edited. Meaning the video was not continuous.
As I understand it, and I haven't been to one of the viewings (like you), the video is still running continuous, just sped up for a portion of the run. Being sped up does not equal being edited. Now, if you were to say that its more difficult to see any potential fouls due to the speed, at least that is a valid argument. I'm not certain that it would make a difference, but again, neither you nor I have seen that sped-up video. It apparently doesn't bother those who are knowledgeable and have actually watched it.
But you are only continuing to make yourself look bad by claiming that the video is "chopped". Not that you care.
I guess I can look forward to this being quoted in the next day or two, as well as 3 or 4 months from now...
JS had to take at least one or two bathroom breaks. And who knows how much time passed between racks.
You are 100% justified in arguing for evidence.
Pin
Registered
Honestly, I recommend not arguing with Danny or non-believers.
Looking at it objectively, he's going to believe what he believes, and it should be fairly clear by now that nobody's going to change his mind.
But is that such a bad thing? Sure, it might grate slightly, but in the grand scheme of things, some guy on the internet doesn't believe it's real. Okay.
Mosconi's record was a really nice one, and it was amazing that it stood for so long, so there's an element of sadness in seeing it go. The human mind doesn't like change, and will try to believe what it wants to believe. We have to work to overcome this, and everyone fails to be perfectly rational sometimes.
Looking at it objectively, he's going to believe what he believes, and it should be fairly clear by now that nobody's going to change his mind.
But is that such a bad thing? Sure, it might grate slightly, but in the grand scheme of things, some guy on the internet doesn't believe it's real. Okay.
Mosconi's record was a really nice one, and it was amazing that it stood for so long, so there's an element of sadness in seeing it go. The human mind doesn't like change, and will try to believe what it wants to believe. We have to work to overcome this, and everyone fails to be perfectly rational sometimes.
The fact that you believe that ALL THAT EXISTS is a chopped video and that the BCA received a chopped video (which obviously they didn't) is kind of WAY OUT THERE and totally unreasonable for anyone to believe. The video that shows every shot is what is being presented at the live showings. Many people have seen it. Sure, the boring parts were sped up, but everyone could see that it was a continuous video. Yet, here you are, spreading misinformation. We all know why you are doing it. But you won't convince any sane individual.
Danny/radar and justnum - a marriage made in heaven. Maybe they'll run off together...
pj <- a guy can dream
chgo
I hear DrDave likes to make videos about you. AZBilliards is like a matchmaking service.
How many videos have you been quoted in?
Do you plan to be a surprise guest?
It's been pointed out many times that the BCA saw a continuous video of the run, and were satisfied it was good, and the BCA sanctioned John Schmidt's record run. Other people have also seen the video, including numerous prominent players.
Danny Harriman's opinion doesn't matter, and i guess that hurts his feelings. It's even more painful for him because Danny has such a hate on for everything John Schmidt.. He just keeps repeating over and over that there's fraud and a conspiracy.
The opinions of Danny's alternate reality personalities don't matter. Your opinion doesn't matter, and neither does mine. It's a BCA record.
But if you're also alleging that John Schmidt, the pool room owner, JS's team, the witnesses, the BCA, Predator Cues, Billiards Digest, the New York Times, and all those prominent players are part of a conspiracy, you should just say it.
You got all that from what I said?
Danny! You're back!!
It's great to hear from you again!!
And you haven't deleted your last four posts yet! C'mon, you can do it!!
10 wouldn't be the bet, I agree.
And since you and the offender are the same person, it obviously can't happen.
If you two were actually different people, you couldn't win.
Talk is cheap.
Whaddya wanna do for a few?
- Status