Lol... I appreciate the help you have already provided.Come on, if I gave you all the answers, what would there be left for you to figure out![]()
Thanks
Lol... I appreciate the help you have already provided.Come on, if I gave you all the answers, what would there be left for you to figure out![]()
Apologies, I missed this yesterday.If you need the nameplate let me know![]()
Just out of curiosity and forgive me if you've already stated the reason, but why didn't you start out with a better table such as a Gold Crown or comparable commercial grade table?Apologies, I missed this yesterday.
Thanks but I have everything for this table. I needed to remove the nameplate to allow ease in sanding off the old finish. I do some backyard metal casting along with my many other diy hobbies. I'm most likely going to replace the old nameplate with something of my own design. Maybe with the family crest.
There's a ton more work going into this table then has been disclosed already. It will not be anything like any other 'Celebrity' out in the world when I'm done.
Stay tuned...
I think I did touch on that earlier on, but I don't have a problem running through it again.Just out of curiosity and forgive me if you've already stated the reason, but why didn't you start out with a better table such as a Gold Crown or comparable commercial grade table?
Agreed on the time spent aspect and understood on the cost vs value proposition.I think I did touch on that earlier on, but I don't have a problem running through it again.
First is cost. Now this is relative because some apply their personal burn rate to the diy projects they take on. It needs to be understood that I am not one of those people. I actually swing the other way and perfer to take on projects even if there's minor savings to be had.
I had a line on a Canada Billiards 'Black Crown II' (commerical grade) table in fairly new condition. It would have cost me $~3k to purchase. Of course I would still have to tear it down and set it up. I never took the time to see it in person so I can't speak to it's pocket specs. That said, it was in a pool room which leads me to believe it still would have been lacking (too loose) to what I perfer to play on. So, reno a table I already own...?..., or buy a table that I'll have to reno. Although I do like the styling of the Black Crown II. I can't justify ~3k just because of some OEM chrome trim.
As good a reason as any and I figured this played into the decision.Second is heritage. This table was bought by my mother as a gift to my father. Although he did initially attempt to sell it on the open market before giving it to me. That fact still remains that it was gift by him to me and my family. So although the table isn't of exceeding quality or lengthy lineage. It still remains an item that has been passed down generationally speaking. If I bought something else, this table would have to go. No one else in my family either has the room and/or plays the game enough to justify having a table. So..., I have zero doubt that I can make this table play as well as anything else with the right amount of effort. What any other table would lack, is this heritage.
I'm a DIY'er too so I get it.Lastly, the challenge. Reno'ing a table is something I've never taken on before. I'm one of those types of people that jump at opprotunities to learn skills. I'm an electrician by trade. Upgraded to automation and then controls programming professionally. I took up woodworking, which turned me on to vintage machinery restoration. That shifted me into metal casting and hobby machining....etc. Professionally I've went to pasture and took an admin job, so my idle hands and need of challenge made this project a must do.
I relate to all of the above. Thanks for taking the time to spell it out.I know some will not related to any of the above. Yes, I could have easily bought something else, or thrown a ton of money at someone of experienced skill to do the work I'm taking on. That's just not the way I'm wired I'm afraid.![]()
No problem. I enjoyed doing so...Thanks for taking the time to spell it out.
I think that is good, there are some on here that think you should leave some things to the experts.No problem. I enjoyed doing so...
If my postings here encourage one other to take on the challenge of learning a new skill. It's worth the effort.
Yep, but in their defence. They're experts for a reason.I think that is good, there are some on here that think you should leave some things to the experts.
I agree, I wasn't referring to the experts, they have a right to feel that way.Yep, but in their defence. They're experts for a reason.
I hope the pros don't see these efforts and my eagerness to post them as a slight to their trade.
This whole search for a downward angle thing for example. I don't have the luxury of experimentation. I'm doing this once and that's it. I will not pull the rails, strip the cloth, and increase the downward angle just to see if they'll play better. It has made that particular aspect of this project the most intensely researched.
I respect not getting a handout by those in the know. They earned that knowledge. However that doesn't mean I won't flog the internet looking and encourage those with the data to post it up. Nothing but a resource moving forward imo
From my point of view, experts should get something out of what they offer on this forum and people seeking info should pay. It's one thing if it's a bunch of diy guys like us sharing intel, it's another when someone that does this for a living is sharing what they know.Yep, but in their defence. They're experts for a reason.
I hope the pros don't see these efforts and my eagerness to post them as a slight to their trade.
This whole search for a downward angle thing for example. I don't have the luxury of experimentation. I'm doing this once and that's it. I will not pull the rails, strip the cloth, and increase the downward angle just to see if they'll play better. It has made that particular aspect of this project the most intensely researched.
I respect not getting a handout by those in the know. They earned that knowledge. However that doesn't mean I won't flog the internet looking and encourage those with the data to post it up. Nothing but a resource moving forward imo
Well they do have option not to comment.. lol.From my point of view, experts should get something out of what they offer on this forum and people seeking info should pay. It's one thing if it's a bunch of diy guys like us sharing intel, it's another when someone that does this for a living is sharing what they know.
Yes, those are generated based on the drawing. I'm pretty sure the dimensions are set to 1/32" precision. If I recall correctly, I drew the centerline of the pocket and offset it 2 1/4" to each side. Then I drew the inside face of the pocket from the intersection of the nose of the cushion and my offset line at the 51 or 141 degree angle. Then I offset the face .2 of an inch for the facing. I can't do anything with it right now but I'll try to look at it tomorrow. The facing should extend the nose of the cushion .318". If I get a chance I will add a couple of dimensions to clarify and change them to decimal. I believe in post #99, your facing is set 39 degrees from perpendicular, it should be 51. The .2188 width represented on my drawing is measured in the direction of the points of the pocket, 45 degrees from the length of the rail.For determining a datum for the dimensioning of the side pockets I worked off the 'bottom' cushion and generated a center line across the table. Note that the table is not only completely square, but symetrical as well, so my 50" center line is repeatable from either short rail.
From that centerline, I marked out the half distance required for the pocket opening. The miter angle is measure off the cushion.
I reviewed the model you put together and I'm curious about the dimensioning of the corner pocket. The values of the pocket cut line (4-15/16) and the finished opening (4-1/2). Are those auto-generated by your drawing sw based on the 51* angle you used...? They boil down to a cross sectional width of 0.2188" for the facings. I ask because it varies from the calculation I did using the triangle calc tool, (.257"). Roughly 0.040" of difference per side, so 0.080" total.
Yeah, that's a tough one. I use free software, such as LibreOffice. I have a number of computers and rebuild the OSs on occasion. When I grab LibreOffice it will give me the opportunity to donate to their foundation and normally I will. Not a lot, 10 bucks or something but it's part of what keeps them afloat and creating good software so I don't have to buy MS office for lots of $.Well they do have option not to comment.. lol.
Not sure of the logistics required to solicit professional direction over the internet. You pay member 'xxx' and hope you get what you're hoping for?
A menu board sticky...?
Diff rates based on pro member..?
There's that confusion I was hoping to avoid. I doubled back on a couple of posts to attempt to clear the air but maybe I didn't do so adequately. I'll run through it again. Yes, there was a little flip flopping on the use of those two values. Below I'll show why the value of 39 got into the mix.I believe in post #99, your facing is set 39 degrees from perpendicular, it should be 51. The .2188 width represented on my drawing is measured in the direction of the points of the pocket, 45 degrees from the length of the rail.
Yes, he's been very helpful. Hopefully I have conveyed my appreciation adequately.I think RKC got pretty deep on this one. Of all the threads I've read on rail rebuilding this one is definitely the most comprehensive with the tools he uses, doesn't cut with miter saw, uses sanding blade on miter saw to finish instead. Also how he calculates effective pocket size etc. Stuff I wouldn't of thought of for sure.
Unfortunately the thread "title" doesn't reflect the good info posted.... I think RKC got pretty deep on this one. Of all the threads I've read on rail rebuilding this one is definitely the most comprehensive ...
Maybe the mods should retitle and sticky the thread. Or @realkingcobra could write a book on the subject. RKC add that to the other 140 items on your to-do list, no pressure.Unfortunately the thread "title" doesn't reflect the good info posted.
Unfortunately the thread "title" doesn't reflect the good info posted.
I think the thread title is perfecty fine and depicts the content and it's collection as accurately as one could.Maybe the mods should retitle and sticky the thread.
Did you get an opportunity to measure up your pocket angles...?Is this a GC? I have my rails removed from my GC IV I could measure the angles.