Taom Chalk

We have 8-9 foot Diamonds with the pro cut 4 & 1/2" pockets. Most folks bitch about the pockets and the LONG shelve depth, but I love it. I am the only person that takes pride in my ownership of cues. Have the 4 X 8 case and it's full. I just now bought the Predator Rush Break cue ( I love it ), have ivory pierced Ned Morris cues and a nice jump cue. It's hard to believe but I'm the best in about 140 members and I'm old and about a 600 Fargo. We also have the ICA projector system and I'm the only one that practices on it daily. Their balls were the Aramith Premiums and not on the list of great balls. I now play with the Dynaspheres Broonze and the Predator Arcos II cue ball and put them away when I'm gone. I play with the best I can buy and now I've ordered Taom V10 chalk. Note: I'm spending my money because my only son is a CEO of a profitable company. He nor his kids need my money at all. Spending it to have fun.
 
The best chalk for the money is the Russian Magic Chalk, I prefer this chalk to the Kamui anytimes, Alosius Yapp play with.
Careful brother, apparently in this thread those are fighting words! 🤣
 
12 page thread on chalk!

Toam sure has a devoted following. Definitely nice & clean, but its lack of abrasiveness means it doesn’t have the natural tip shaping characteristic that Masters etc do. To me seems you have to maintain your tip more carefully with Toam. Not a bad thing, I’m just lazy. For home table env, I find Russian Magic to be a nice middle of the road compromise on cost, abrasiveness & cleanliness… ✌️
Wow
 
Do you use v10 or pyro? My pyro seems to leave occasional flakes around, but otherwise is by far the cleanest chalk I've ever used. I bought five pieces thinking that was a lifetime supply, but if v10 doesn't even leave the odd flake around then I might have to switch over (I still wish they'd just release it in blue, already).
V10
 
I've seen the flakes with pyro but never with V10. Also a hard miscue almost makes pyro tear up like plastic wrap. Not so with V10, but it takes a damn bad stroke to miscue with either.
Same, the place I play league at is hardcore with the color of chalk. It has to be blue, no exceptions. So I use pyro at league and have tried it a few times at home vs V10. I get a bunch of flakes with pyro on my home table. Not a fan. It does apply easy and is still pretty clean on the cue ball but the V10 is much cleaner at least for me.
 
You emote like an arrogant dickhead just because I mentioned the fact that legacy grainy chalk has a more abrasive impact on the tip? All you world beaters out there on AZB and no other pool players experiences this? Ok, then…
Here's what you actually said....
its lack of abrasiveness means it doesn’t have the natural tip shaping characteristic that Masters etc do.
If you just mentioned that it may not be as abrasive as Master or the like, then I would have merely gotten a chuckle out of the comment and moved on. The truth is you stated that Masters(or the like) has tip shaping qualities, and those using something akin to Taom may have to shape their tip more regularly. This is hilarious.

Now, am I an arrogant dickhead...? Sure, if that helped you sleep last night. Most people react by name calling when being called out after posting nonsense. Am I a world beater..?.., hell no. However I am someone that chalks more then the nutbars that chalk relentlessly. I have yet to notice a single effect on the shape of my tip. So it looks like I'm speaking from decades of experimentation.
 
(I still wish they'd just release it in blue, already).
I'm ok with the pale green. It's the shape that throws me off. Decades of grabbing a cube and indexing it between my fingers just feels right.

Maybe I should drill out a cube and glue in the Taom...lol
 
I'm ok with the pale green. It's the shape that throws me off. Decades of grabbing a cube and indexing it between my fingers just feels right.

Maybe I should drill out a cube and glue in the Taom...lol

Buy one of these.....




or this ,


 
Here's what you actually said....

If you just mentioned that it may not be as abrasive as Master or the like, then I would have merely gotten a chuckle out of the comment and moved on. The truth is you stated that Masters(or the like) has tip shaping qualities, and those using something akin to Taom may have to shape their tip more regularly. This is hilarious.

Now, am I an arrogant dickhead...? Sure, if that helped you sleep last night. Most people react by name calling when being called out after posting nonsense. Am I a world beater..?.., hell no. However I am someone that chalks more then the nutbars that chalk relentlessly. I have yet to notice a single effect on the shape of my tip. So it looks like I'm speaking from decades of experimentation.
I really had no idea that the concept of gritty chalk having an abrasive quality that contributes to maintaining the tips shape - would be a controversial topic. I guess I’ll just defer to your vast experience. I see from your title that you pride yourself on being “AZB combat certified”, and are apparently quite passionate about the topic. Clearly I’m an idiot, sorry to have ruffled your feathers with such naive and silly perspectives…
 
I just ordered some V10. What type of chalk holder works with that round chalk? I don't like the leather pouch. Thanks
 
I just ordered some V10. What type of chalk holder works with that round chalk? I don't like the leather pouch. Thanks
The price is a bit steep, but I've found the Kamui hexagonal chalk holder works great with Taom Pyro (I'm assuming, but can't guarantee, that V10 is the same dimension):


Other chalk holders I've found when the "lid" isn't on then the chalk can fall out. With the Kamui I don't have that issue at all.
 
I really had no idea that the concept of gritty chalk having an abrasive quality that contributes to maintaining the tips shape - would be a controversial topic.
It's not, because that implies your suggestion has some validity. Claiming it does (chalk shaping tips that is), is down right funny. Unfortunately I'm willing to bet someone is going to lap up that drivel and think it gospel.
I guess I’ll just defer to your vast experience. I see from your title that you pride yourself on being “AZB combat certified”, and are apparently quite passionate about the topic.
I was praised by another forum member for being able to handle 'difficult' posters in stride. I made it my handle. Surprising how often I earn that title here. Not sure where you're gleening this passion from. I'm simply responding to what's being posted in the thread. I have no axe to grind in any direction.
Clearly I’m an idiot, sorry to have ruffled your feathers with such naive and silly perspectives…
Hey, I didn't call you or imply that, but if that's what you see in the mirror then so be it. Again, not ruffled, not passionate. Entertained...?..., certainly.
 
It's not, because that implies your suggestion has some validity. Claiming it does (chalk shaping tips that is), is down right funny. Unfortunately I'm willing to bet someone is going to lap up that drivel and think it gospel.

I was praised by another forum member for being able to handle 'difficult' posters in stride. I made it my handle. Surprising how often I earn that title here. Not sure where you're gleening this passion from. I'm simply responding to what's being posted in the thread. I have no axe to grind in any direction.

Hey, I didn't call you or imply that, but if that's what you see in the mirror then so be it. Again, not ruffled, not passionate. Entertained...?..., certainly.
I see. Ok, let me correct that. Glad to have entertained you with my invalid feeble little contributions to the mighty Taom thread. The fact that you are a condescending arrogant ass, is just the annoying overhead of participating in forums, no harm, no foul. I'll engage with your snark a bit more, since you are so adept & proud of it, but in general let's all just agree that you are the man and wrap this up.

Likewise, its hilarious & bizarre to me you or anyone somehow believes that repeatedly stroking the surface of a relatively soft leather tip with an abrasive piece of grainy chalk doesn't have any effect on the shape of the tip. Not sure if its ignorance+hubris, or just being purposely obtuse, or what...

I don't have to shape my tip after initial shaping and yet it stays nearly perfectly rounded but unfortunately gets thinner over time, eventually needing replacement after 4-6 mo. I've now realized from JV's deep insight here that the question of how & where my leather tip material is disappearing to is apparently an unsolved mystery!. The effect is obviously worse for softer tips and much less so for hard tips. The blue scratches on house cue ferrules from bangers drilling them into worn out cubes is also then a head scratcher. How the whole emery boards & finger nail thing works, is an even more vexing physics anomaly that I'll have to now dig into.

Here's some more content to possibly enrichen your online pool life. If you take the time to actually watch/read these links, among all the other well known basic tip info - they mention the same "invalid & amusing" concept that I brought up, so you should enjoy them greatly. The last one is the patent on original silica based cue tip chalk from 1897 and it literally mentions that the corundum additive's abrasive qualities are specifically for the purpose of roughening the tip. It's rather obvious that the new breeds like Kamui, Toam etc are completely different recipes with different design goals and performance characteristics. None of this takes anything away from Taom v10 which is a very fine product (literally and figuratively).

Cheers ✌️

 
Last edited:
I see. Ok, let me correct that. Glad to have entertained you with my invalid feeble little contributions to the mighty Taom thread. The fact that you are a condescending arrogant ass, is just the annoying overhead of participating in forums, no harm, no foul. I'll engage with your snark a bit more, since you are so adept & proud of it, but in general let's all just agree that you are the man and wrap this up.
lol... thanks again

...word ;)
 
Back
Top