Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit

Status
Not open for further replies.
justnum said:
In a game where 5 in pockets versus 4.5 in pockets matters, pros know how to make cheat look normal.
Click to expand...
Can you give me a video example of this actually happening?? Its pretty easy to identify 4 1/2" pockets, just put 2 balls in the jaws, 4 1/2" pockets they will be tight, 5" pockets they will roll in together. Besides, in most cases one is playing against an opponent which means the table will be the same for each player regardless of pocket size, where is the cheating in this example??
 
fastone371 said:
Can you give me a video example of this actually happening?? Its pretty easy to identify 4 1/2" pockets, just put 2 balls in the jaws, 4 1/2" pockets they will be tight, 5" pockets they will roll in together. Besides, in most cases one is playing against an opponent which means the table will be the same for each player regardless of pocket size, where is the cheating in this example??
Click to expand...

Just use electromagnets and switch to the magnetic ball set. Cameras wouldnt accurately show when the magnets are activated. That is why live in person records on competition tables should only count as high run records.

Magnetic balls were popular.
 
The problem with everyone believing the record is because no one has exposed the ways to cheat with non competition equipment.

The history of billiards is full of magic and tricks, its no different with making records.
 
justnum said:
The problem with everyone believing the record is because no one has exposed the ways to cheat with non competition equipment.

The history of billiards is full of magic and tricks, its no different with making records.
Click to expand...
Nobody involved is dumb enough to think the resources required to pull off such a thing would be worth the gain.. much less do they have the skills to execute such unbelievable nefariocities.

Yeah, I make word.
 
Dead Money said:
That is nothing. Dead Money argues with Dead Money all the time.
Click to expand...
Screenshot_20221028-140149.jpg
 
Black-Balled said:
Nobody involved is dumb enough to think the resources required to pull off such a thing would be worth the gain.. much less do they have the skills to execute such unbelievable nefariocities.

Yeah, I make word.
Click to expand...

No one has caught a cheater at pool because no one know how they are cheating.
 
justnum said:
What is even more shocking is no one saved the pool table Mosconi made his historic run on.

Dan is 100% justified in his suspicions. For the BCA to certify a run without validating the pool equipment or document the table specs clearly shows willful ignorance in proper record keeping.

As for John or Jayson the records are documented but not believable. That is why 14.1 live performances records should matter more than exhibition records or private practice run attempts.
Click to expand...
Why is Shaw's record not believable?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top