Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit

Status
Not open for further replies.
justnum said:
The minimum is the table should be placed on a level floor. There should be a table check to show that balls do not roll favorably towards pockets.

If you played on worn or aged equipment you know some pockets are more open than others. If a mechanic was good they could have the table look like it matches competition specs but play like black holes, sucking in any balls that roll close but would not fall on a proper table.
Click to expand...
Well this is a new theory. Please elaborate on how you came to this conclusion. lol
 
justnum said:
No one has caught a cheater at pool because no one know how they are cheating.
Click to expand...
Maybe the alleged "cheaters" don't get caught because (this will be far fetched for you) THEY ARE NOT CHEATING!!!!.
Do you know who the best refs are? The competition, if someone is suspected of cheating you better believe the other players will be watching closely because nobody wants to be the victim and they all want to win.
 
justnum said:
The problem with everyone believing the record is because no one has exposed the ways to cheat with non competition equipment.

The history of billiards is full of magic and tricks, its no different with making records.
Click to expand...
Since you are aware of all of this cheating going on how about you post some evidence. Unless some players actually got caught y6ou are trying to spread you own twisted conspiracy theories. So make it real, post up the evidence or quit crying wolf.
 
justnum said:
The proof is in the pudding. There are more posts about the record being a fake, then there are posts of it being real. Empirically that evidence is conclusive enough.
Click to expand...
What empirical evidence do you have that Shaw's isn't real? Since I watched it live I would love to know if that was actually a hallucination. It will give my therapist and I some new material to cover.
 
ACL said:
What empirical evidence do you have that Shaw's isn't real? Since I watched it live I would love to know if that was actually a hallucination. It will give my therapist and I some new material to cover.
Click to expand...
Live in person or live steamed? Was it before or after the table was set up?
 
justnum said:
Live in person or live steamed? Was it before or after the table was set up?
Click to expand...
Live streamed. I did not see the set up of the table. Does anyone witness the set up of a table prior to a tournament?

To use your example, no one in this thread witnessed the table set up for Mosconi's record and we don't question it, nor should we.

So, let me ask you again. What evidence, empirical or otherwise, can you provide showing that Shaw's record wasn't real?
 
justnum said:
The proof is in the pudding. There are more posts about the record being a fake, then there are posts of it being real. Empirically that evidence is conclusive enough.
Click to expand...

crazy people rock back and forth saying the lawn chair is laughing at me, since theres no one sayin the opposite more times than the crazy person it must be true, your brilliant!
 
xradarx said:
There exists more evidence of the real hi-run record of 768 Continuous, consecutive balls, as having been set by Babe Cranfield with confirmation by the individual that racked all of the racks for Cranfield’s run.
Sorry, to say, but, the gimmicked tables have little to do with surpassing the ‘Babe’s’ total.
Though, none compare to a record set during an advertised, scheduled exhibition.
Click to expand...
yeah no he had two rackers on that one bub
, two dudes each saw one half of the supposed run
yet you idiots dont believe in video footage, unless its in compact disc format only
fkn hilarious
 
xradarx said:
There exists more evidence of the real hi-run record of 768 Continuous, consecutive balls, as having been set by Babe Cranfield with confirmation by the individual that racked all of the racks for Cranfield’s run.
Sorry, to say, but, the gimmicked tables have little to do with surpassing the ‘Babe’s’ total.
Though, none compare to a record set during an advertised, scheduled exhibition.
Click to expand...
Admittedly I don't know much about Cranfield's run. If it went down the way you said it did, why was Mosconi's run recognized as the record? Not being a wise a**. I am asking a genuine question.

And please explain gimmicked tables.
 
xradarx said:
What’a 180 degree switch-a-roo!
All you js626 nuthuggers allowed the claim and the exposed false certification without even 1(one) published frame of unedited video in support, are now, demanding that others provide proof to you of any and all opposing views that are brought to bear on this forum.
No eff’ing way.
Click to expand...
WTF are you squealing about ??? I never said I agreed or disagreed with the 626 run, I couldn't possibly care less if its real or not, it affects me in no way whatsoever. Feel free to find the post where I approve or disapprove of what is going on in this situation. Before accusing someone of being a "nuthugger" you may want to wipe your chin off and hop on your moms interweb to see what I actually posted.
 
ACL said:
Admittedly I don't know much about Cranfield's run. If it went down the way you said it did, why was Mosconi's run recognized as the record? Not being a wise a**. I am asking a genuine question.

And please explain gimmicked tables.
Click to expand...
Because Mosconi was in the employ of Brunswick, who was in bed with the BCA.

There's my conspiracy theory for the day.
 
xradarx said:
Go back to those two balls that you can pocket on those no hole tables and try to convince us that you know anything about what you preach.
Oh, and by the way bub your avatar says all we need to know about ya.
You sure as hell don’t know anything about 14.1 Continuous.
Click to expand...
That avatar is a pic I snook when I seen you out there looking like SpongeBob talkin bout 14.1 continuous pocket billiards knowledge
 
xradarx said:
There exists more evidence of the real hi-run record of 768 Continuous, consecutive balls, as having been set by Babe Cranfield with confirmation by the individual that racked all of the racks for Cranfield’s run.
Sorry, to say, but, the gimmicked tables have little to do with surpassing the ‘Babe’s’ total.
Though, none compare to a record set during an advertised, scheduled exhibition.
Click to expand...
So because one single person, who happens to be the son of the player, says it happened then it happened, but when its video taped and reviewed by a governing sanctioned body it can’t be true.

Life is hard, going through it with your mental bandwidth must be brutal. I feel sorry for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top