kiss it.
Last edited:
Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
- Thread starter Dan Harriman
- Start date
- Status
I back up ALL my talk with a volcano sized bankroll. Can you or anyone question this fact?
I'm also willing to out up 1 million in cash if anyone claims Jayson's High Run is edited, pieced together etc. And wants to have any video experts in the World put the video through any equipment in the World including NASA the Pentagon or anywhere else.
Do you care to make this wager or Danny?
Put up 25k to my 1 million. See I talk a lot as you just stated but I got a giant bankroll to back up my talking and you & Danny & Justnum only talk with zero bankroll to back it up. I understand you all are keyboard warriors.
So what if he gets sued? Broke people have no such worries.
I have almost 1m USD owed to my office as a result of Court awards and I can sell that debt to collectors for 6% of its value. What are the chances I get that million? Prob a little greater than 6%
Add another zero to your 14.1 10K bet and I'm sure Jayson will oblige.
Sure, whatever you say.
Jayson Shaw has a standing offer you have yet to address about those 14 ball increments : -)
Lou Figueroa
let's see
who spins now
Gd I love this thread
Now reply to Bobby calling y'all out ms's harrydog
Statements like that are why Danny feels wronged by the world.
Danny is gonna have to bet more than 10k. A lot more (or as our subject would say, alot more).
If you/yours can get to the post with six figures, I would be VERY surprised to see Jayson's side turn you down.
You are correct; I don't speak for his side.
Its common for athletes to have a peak performance. What is so incredible about a 14.1 high run is the lack of supporting evidence. If a high run over 400 is achieved, the statistical question is how often can they achieve runs over 400.
At lower levels players struggle to run 50 or more consistently. There are pro players that can consistently run 100 or more at will. The question I pose is how often should a 14.1 world record holder be able to break 400?
Assuming Jayson broke 700, then how many times could he do it. In the world of statistics there are outliers and then there are averages. Anything over 400 is an outlier and the documented cases of runs over 400 would suggest its about as likely as meeting an alien from another galaxy.
The first straight pool championship was in 1912. If in 100+ years of straight pool existence most players ran under 200 consistently, then in the given distribution the promoted high runs should be considered excluded from the data set because of the skew.
In simple English yes there are ranges of greatness in sports, and beyond that is disbelief. Athletes are getting taller, stronger, faster and more productive. The law of natural limits does exist. No one expects an 11 foot basketball player, no one expects a person to be able to squat 10 tons and no one is expected to run a sub 3 minute mile. A 14.1 record could only be disputed by pool players with knowledge about the game.
Where do you think most top straight pool players top out at when it comes to a high run they can consistently produce?
At lower levels players struggle to run 50 or more consistently. There are pro players that can consistently run 100 or more at will. The question I pose is how often should a 14.1 world record holder be able to break 400?
Assuming Jayson broke 700, then how many times could he do it. In the world of statistics there are outliers and then there are averages. Anything over 400 is an outlier and the documented cases of runs over 400 would suggest its about as likely as meeting an alien from another galaxy.
The first straight pool championship was in 1912. If in 100+ years of straight pool existence most players ran under 200 consistently, then in the given distribution the promoted high runs should be considered excluded from the data set because of the skew.
In simple English yes there are ranges of greatness in sports, and beyond that is disbelief. Athletes are getting taller, stronger, faster and more productive. The law of natural limits does exist. No one expects an 11 foot basketball player, no one expects a person to be able to squat 10 tons and no one is expected to run a sub 3 minute mile. A 14.1 record could only be disputed by pool players with knowledge about the game.
Where do you think most top straight pool players top out at when it comes to a high run they can consistently produce?
Right on, Lou.
And after nearly 7k -worth of ping-ponging, thrust-parry Replies to all comers, in this thread, it's a lock that a fair percentage of AZBers will pay $20 or so, for an un-edited video stream or thumb drive of this particular, ideal matchup . . . with both champions -- win or lose -- receiving a nice chunk of the gross.
And then, video of the re-match -- what possibilities!
Arnaldo
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I wouldn't fk with him either and would look for any deflection possible as well, as per your not engaging him
telinoz
Registered
Sue me.
Please.
telinoz
Registered
Summary take 2.
Any amount of money Dan, that is what is being offered...
All you have to do is name the wager.
Ball is 100% in your court.
All 714 of them.
I was very close to forgetting about that, damn.
You can't apply that analysis to two completely dissimilar feats. Running a two minute mile is not likely because of physical limits. A 400 ball run is just four consecutive 100 ball runs and an 800 ball run is just two of those. Unlikely, unpredictable and rare..yes. But there is no real physical barrier.
Your new friend has no trouble believing Mosconi did 525 at an exhibition and 600+ in practice. He has no trouble believing Irving Crane did 7 or 800 or whatever. So are you saying Danny is wrong to believe these runs happened?
- Status