It's funny because I'm quite the opposite. I can cue perfectly straight most of the time up until I start hitting some serious speed. But, if I get warmed up and play for a few hrs that strong pace of a stroke starts to straighten out pretty good. I'll take a roll or drag roll shot over a stun any day of the week. Just more confident cueing straight that way.I think the main reason players avoid rolling the ball - is because it hides their stroke flaws. Yeah I'm pointing the finger at you - BasementDweller. Huh?
If you are hitting firm all the time, you may be masking those slight stroke wobbles. Instead work on both, hitting the ball firm or even hard and then hitting the ball so soft it barely reaches the pocket.
Knowing you can roll a ball in like Ralph Souquet gives you a level of confidence that few players have. I think Ralph is probably the best ball roller of all time.
I can relate to this. when I/we hit with more speed(/length?), we lose accuracy- ?It's funny because I'm quite the opposite. I can cue perfectly straight most of the time up until I start hitting some serious speed. But, if I get warmed up and play for a few hrs that strong pace of a stroke starts to straighten out pretty good. I'll take a roll or drag roll shot over a stun any day of the week. Just more confident cueing straight that way.
Makes banks more predictableI have an alternate opinion here. I notice most top players take a full, firm stroke and rarely hit soft. Shave and Jason Shaw are two examples that come to mind.
On a related note, the best bank pool players tend to hit most banks way harder than it seems they should. What's up with that?
I think this is a friction issue. Eliminate it and any to low to no speed is a no brainer. Independence of accuracy from speed is the body of work.I feel one of the biggest differences between pros and amateurs is how soft the pros can hit the ball and get the desired results.
Not exactly. More speed can put your stroke in a non linear zone. More distance can present more negative or psychosomatic issues to a shooter but the problems of distance are only stroke and to a lesser degree, table roll.I can relate to this. when I/we hit with more speed(/length?), we lose accuracy- ?
i have the same issue as OP, but when i started hitting them softer but ran into deceleration issues..I think the main reason players avoid rolling the ball - is because it hides their stroke flaws. Yeah I'm pointing the finger at you - BasementDweller. Huh?
If you are hitting firm all the time, you may be masking those slight stroke wobbles. Instead work on both, hitting the ball firm or even hard and then hitting the ball so soft it barely reaches the pocket.
Knowing you can roll a ball in like Ralph Souquet gives you a level of confidence that few players have. I think Ralph is probably the best ball roller of all time.
Not necessarily. On a surprising number of shots, I've noticed that you have the option of forcing the cue ball into position or rolling it into position.
Agree, if you hold the cue loosely and stroke correctly, you rarely have to hit the ball hard. Efren playing 14.1 is a good example of this. Mosconi mostly would hit the ball no faster than medium speed, and hit got him anywhere he needed to go. He once said that there are two speeds to hit the cueball, soft, and softer. And, he played on the older, slower cloth.I feel one of the biggest differences between pros and amateurs is how soft the pros can hit the ball and get the desired results.
I have an alternate opinion here. I notice most top players take a full, firm stroke and rarely hit soft. Shave and Jason Shaw are two examples that come to mind.
On a related note, the best bank pool players tend to hit most banks way harder than it seems they should. What's up with that?
Agree, if you hold the cue loosely and stroke correctly, you rarely have to hit the ball hard. Efren playing 14.1 is a good example of this. Mosconi mostly would hit the ball no faster than medium speed, and hit got him anywhere he needed to go. He once said that there are two speeds to hit the cueball, soft, and softer. And, he played on the older, slower cloth.
-dj
This bite from you OP....is what works for me.Anyways, last night I spent a little time running balls while focusing on letting the cue ball start rolling prior to contact as much as possible.
Not exactly. More speed can put your stroke in a non linear zone. More distance can present more negative or psychosomatic issues to a shooter but the problems of distance are only stroke and to a lesser degree, table roll.
Video I have seen of Mosconi he hit everything fairly firm.Mosconi could do that because his position was so precise all he had to do was move the CB a smidge thataway or a smooge thisaway for his next shot.
When he had to, like for a break shot, or on those rare ocassions he got out of line, he could and would smack the bejesus out of the ball.
Efren playing 14.1 is not a good example because he had little experience at the game and kinda played it ass backwards. But because he’s Efren he could often get away with it.
Lou Figueroa
Video I have seen of Mosconi he hit everything fairly firm.
Center ball or a little above or below but still firm. Just because he wasn't running Whitey around doesn't mean he was shooting soft!
Shooting in the summer league with my off hand has provided me greater insight into the average joe's struggles with when developing their mechanics. After decades of play, I've taken for granted my ability to cue straight with my proper hand.It's funny because I'm quite the opposite. I can cue perfectly straight most of the time up until I start hitting some serious speed. But, if I get warmed up and play for a few hrs that strong pace of a stroke starts to straighten out pretty good. I'll take a roll or drag roll shot over a stun any day of the week. Just more confident cueing straight that way.