Deja cue all over again , , , I was just thinking this. If we are to consider the effect of psychology on pool competition, then what an opponent brings to bear is de minimus compared to our own mental machinations.
Stroke-play golf maybe but not match-play. In match play what your opponent does has a huge effect on how you play. whether to lay-up safe or go for it totally depends both the tally on each hole as well the overall score. Match-play is as much a mind-game as a physical one. Short,straight hitters that putt good often beat players that are much longer hitters. Putting is everything in match play. You hole a 50ftr for par can make the other guy's knees weak.The recent thread concerning “I beat myself, he didn’t beat me” was the impetus for my post. Taken to its logical extreme, this statement might be asserted as true in all sports -- "My bad eyes not his 100 mph fastball" as an excuse for striking out. Also, please recall my initial proposition: "with the exception of the leave , , , not nearly as significant as we suppose". My essential point is that when I miss it is not because of my opposition as he is not immediately involved. (Perhaps I should have also excluded psychological effects but such was more than I cared involve,)
Golf is a good example of absolute separation, again excepting, of course, the psychology of the thing. When I think about it, however, I would go so far as to say there is NO involvement with the other golfer as one is not having to shoot from the other's "leave".
Some pool games (golf, roll out, 1 pocket, and cut-throat) do have greater player/player interaction (again due to the leave or defensive play), but 14.1 is a good example of one's efforts being primarily against the table and not the person.
How about darts? This would be particularly true of the countdown games such as 301 but the tactics in cricket are more or less analogous to safety play in pool.I have given this issue considerable thought through the years, and I have yet to come up with another sport which functions in a like manner.
At golf, I think even if you are playing Tiger, how you play each shot isn't going to change much. Your goals remains the same: to finish the round in the fewest strokes you can and to finish the current hole in the fewest strokes possible.This like the op's statement are true unless your opponent is someone like Tiger or Filler. ...
Happened to me this weekend. Learning a lot more about sitting in the chair as each day goes by hahaLose the lag and watch your opponent run out the set, and you might think they were a pretty huge part of the equation.![]()
Couldn't it be said that the opponent is the scoreboard along with any inner demons floating in the skull?I would say that golf (stroke play) has even less involvement with the opponent.
Match play in golf is a completely different animal than stroke play. If in a match play tournament and you're one up headed to the last hole, which is a long par 5 with water everywhere, you'll definitely be playing that hole differently if your opponent is Tiger or an 18-handicapper.At golf, I think even if you are playing Tiger, how you play each shot isn't going to change much.
I have to nit pick a bit, but I actually disagree with this premise...even in stroke play. The ultimate goal in a golf tournament should be to finish the tournament with the fewest strokes compared to everyone else...not in the "fewest strokes you can".Your goals remains the same: to finish the round in the fewest strokes you can and to finish the current hole in the fewest strokes possible.
i feel this, im never worried about the other player just can i keep my mind from going all over the place with insecurities and getting upset thinking im better than themDeja cue all over again , , , I was just thinking this. If we are to consider the effect of psychology on pool competition, then what an opponent brings to bear is de minimus compared to our own mental machinations.
Yes, I guess that's true. If the single goal is to win the tournament, you have play in a way that will allow you to score lower than what you expect the best in the field to be. Do many players adopt that strategy or do they try to optimize their score while ignoring the field?... I have to nit pick a bit, but I actually disagree with this premise...even in stroke play. The ultimate goal in a golf tournament should be to finish the tournament with the fewest strokes compared to everyone else...not in the "fewest strokes you can".
....
Pro golfers play to optimize their own score and ignore the field, for the most part, with two big exceptions:Yes, I guess that's true. If the single goal is to win the tournament, you have play in a way that will allow you to score lower than what you expect the best in the field to be. Do many players adopt that strategy or do they try to optimize their score while ignoring the field?
God does not deduct from man's alloted time those hours spent playing pool.Yes, but if you truly love playing pool, more to the point is that "time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time."
You can make big coin off that guy, if you make him bet his ego. Hurt his pride so the only way to save face is w money. As I'm sure you're aware Hu, be careful how far you take this tactic. Guys like that have a short fuse when their 'Kingship' is placed in jeopardy in front of the crowd. Fortunately, I'm huge and this has always worked in my favor.It can vary who or what we are playing against. I had been working in a dry county, not even beer nearby for a week. I liked beer, Tom T Hall level liked beer. I was downing a six pack or two after each stop headed back to my home 125 miles away. I decided I wanted to hit a ball. There were some bars on a side highway I had never stopped at but with three or four of them they were bound to have a table in there somewhere.
I stopped and got in a game with the local god. Not just pool, you knew this younger man had been the high school football and baseball star, basketball too. He was IT in this small town. Friday evening early, the place had maybe thirty or forty people in it. The people tending bar, the people stocking, every set of eyeballs in the place locked on the pool table. They cheered every shot my opponent made. They jeered and laughed anytime things weren't perfect for me.
There were plenty of times I could have faded that kind of heat and did. That wasn't the time and place though and I got back on the road to more laughter!
If a stranger was playing me in a place that had a few gaffs like a dark room and huge entrance door that swung open into bright sunlight, whatever, you could be pretty sure I would bring the environment into the game when I got a chance. No more than had been done to me on more than one occasion. Knowing your battlefield doesn't mean just knowing the table.
The one person in the place that isn't my opponent is me. Like coddling a girl that doesn't play pool playing scotch doubles, I am choosing the shots I am playing well that day. If cross side banks are falling like rain I don't hesitate to include them in a run. Jaw a couple of them and only the very easiest will be included. That might actually be long fine cut shots or whatever I am weak on that day. I'm taking the best care I can of myself.
Hu
You can make big coin off that guy, if you make him bet his ego. Hurt his pride so the only way to save face is w money. As I'm sure you're aware Hu, be careful how far you take this tactic. Guys like that have a short fuse when their 'Kingship' is placed in jeopardy in front of the crowd. Fortunately, I'm huge and this has always worked in my favor.Less intimidating folks might reconsider this action.
From an old worn roadie who's been there, done that. If I reply or post on here, rest assured I'll be straight and won't exaggerate things just to make myself appear better. Or something. Lol.
My compliments to the chef Hu!!On top of everything else the old nine footer in this place was in horrible shape. Huge rips in the cloth and broken cushions, bare cushions and bed in places, normally a table I wouldn't play on and he knew every gaff there. As for fighting, I would have hated to. He topped me maybe four inches and was very athletic looking. I was alone he had about forty backers that might join in when convenient, grabbing an ankle or just a cheap shot from the side. I usually cleared out the person or people closing in from the side before starting with the main guy after having someone I knew well get sucker punched from the side. He ate through a straw for months. Worked perfectly crossing a punch over a few times, somebody closing from my right, I came across my body with a left that decked them then my body and right hand were cocked to hit my main opponent with one of those shots that come from the toes up. Thing was, I had worked all week, I just wanted to relax and go home and I still had a long drive home.
I did try him again a week or two later. In anything like normal circumstances I should have beaten him. Things went much the same. OK, this is getting ridiculous. I am just going to buy one six pack and sip it on my way to that bar. What is more, I had learned a good bit about conditions on the table and in the bar. I laid my plans, I think the third time would have been the charm. Then I thought about it. Not considering the crowd, he had defended his kingdom fairly twice. Did I keep coming back until I beat him then disappear? My day project was almost over and I would rarely if ever have passed by that bar again. It seemed a little no class to beat him a time or two and then he never get a chance to even the score. He had successfully defended his kingdom twice if not by much. It seemed like enough.
Hu
My compliments to the chef Hu!!
Not many have the common sense or humility to let sleeping dogs lie, etc...
I like how you say he 'Defended his kingdom - twice - successfully'.
By reading the condition of table, general conception of the establishment, etc... sounds to me like his kingdom left much to be desired!! More like King Turd of Crap Mountain!!
Classy walk away Hu!!
Respect!!