Is there benefit to increasing table difficulty factor on my home table?
Any feedback here would be much appreciated
See the "Is it better to practice on a table with tight pockets?" section here:
Is there benefit to increasing table difficulty factor on my home table?
Any feedback here would be much appreciated
I like fast cloth on a 7' table.it becomes a finesse game. I'm not so sure it's always easier to go up in power, I think there's a limit. I guess it's my own fault for getting too straight on the shot, but a stun shot shootout much angle can take a lot of power, my form often suffers on those shots.And yet, I have been advised that covering my table with Simonis 760 is too fast for an 8 foot table (as big as will fit in my playing room.)
I do it anyway--This lets me work on the delicate end of practice. It is easier to add power than it is to add delicacy.
And now that’s standard for pro matchesFor your consideration:
![]()
The Action Report
The Action Report brings you a unique look at professional pool.www.theactionreport.com
"One thing that makes this match stand out is it took place at the TAR Studio when the table was a specially made version from Diamond Billiards with extremely tight 4 inch pockets. The table was so tight and could impact play at times so much that it was eventually traded out for a standard cut Diamond. You see the table play a part in this match."
Standard for 9 ball and 10 ball? I still prefer to think of pool as a collection of games, unlike snooker. Pool, as I see it anyway, generally includes 8 ball, 9 ball, 10 ball, banks, onepocket, 14.1....hell, even Honolulu. 4" pockets with deep shelves like on a diamond are a detriment to 14.1 and banks, IMHO. I continue to wish to play all of the aforementioned games, and as such, I personally believe that the standard Diamond pro represents a fair challenge across games. I've never witnessed even top pros running out entire sets going to 7 games and beyond in 9 ball on 4.5" diamond tables (hell, not on gold crowns either now that I think about it). Until top pros start running out sets regularly, I'm inclined to maintain this position.And now that’s standard for pro matches
I've never witnessed even top pros running out entire sets going to 7 games and beyond in 9 ball on 4.5" diamond tables (hell, not on gold crowns either now that I think about it).
Thanks for this. Even if these packages do happen, they happen infrequently enough to be a special occurrence IMHO, worthy of the "must see" in the title of the video.
i think neuhausen did it recently to lee van, on a rasson with similar pocket size. either way, it's a hard ask to get the top pros to play a race to 7 on tables with 4.5" pockets. for guys like shane, filler, fedor, that's a lag contest / coin flip.
Bigger pockets mean that if I face a guy who's on a roll like that I get to go home and cry sooner, instead of trying to fight off the inevitable.Thanks for this. Even if these packages do happen, they happen infrequently enough to be a special occurrence IMHO, worthy of the "must see" in the title of the video.
I think that's the biggest benefit. My table's a bit soft so I spend a lot of time practicing tougher shots. If i am taking many shots harder than the easiest 25% that I'm practicing, my game is not going well.Can't say it's improved my pocketing or game other than in confidence when I go somewhere else, with buckets for pockets
Matchroom is using 4 inch pockets for all tournaments . 4.5 inch pockets on a diamond with the way their pockets are cut is still much better then 4.75 inch pockets on a valley lolStandard for 9 ball and 10 ball? I still prefer to think of pool as a collection of games, unlike snooker. Pool, as I see it anyway, generally includes 8 ball, 9 ball, 10 ball, banks, onepocket, 14.1....hell, even Honolulu. 4" pockets with deep shelves like on a diamond are a detriment to 14.1 and banks, IMHO. I continue to wish to play all of the aforementioned games, and as such, I personally believe that the standard Diamond pro represents a fair challenge across games. I've never witnessed even top pros running out entire sets going to 7 games and beyond in 9 ball on 4.5" diamond tables (hell, not on gold crowns either now that I think about it). Until top pros start running out sets regularly, I'm inclined to maintain this position.
Having said all that, it's a game and really doesn't matter much either way I reckon.
That’s just nonsense lol none of that makes sense . I don’t need to play as a good a position on a valley because I know if I‘m off who cares. The pockets are so big just hit it smooth with a medium speed .. it will drop right and roll it to the next position or if I actually have to hit it with speed I still have a huge margin of error. I feel no pressure to play great position on a big pocket table because thanks to my home table I know it’s easy to get out of trouble on the valley slush Box. It’s not to say you can’t ever rattle a ball on a valley but it’s a lot harder to which changes everything. It’s like saying if you make a golf hole 5x bigger it won’t make putting easierThe reason I don't think it will make any difference, and I've written this before:
Yes, you will bobble more balls in on an easier table. That means you hit the ball too thick (thick misses are way more common than thin), and your CB won't go as far. You'll be out of line on the next shot. You might still make that next shot. You might even still run that particular rack. It will eventually catch up to you, make no mistake about it, and prevent you from becoming a run-out player.
Even with 6" pockets (which don't exist of course), you have to hit the ball pure and at the correct part of the pocket to get the intended CB position.
True, but AZB's venerable member Atlarge's copious statistics he has compiled for years now do not suggest to me that the pro b & r rate in 9 or 10 ball is high enough that on balance major packages are being put up at a pace that somehow ruins the contest, regardless of playing conditions. I do see in the stats in the link below with a few b & r % topping 40% for nine ball, but those look like the exception not the rule. I guess we can beat the statistics until they tell us what we wish to hear, but in no tournament in that data set do break and run percentages indicate to me that anything is out of line, regardless of pocket size....you haven’t witnessed it but it’s happened. they are putting packs together on 4 inch pockets But that’s whey they are pro’s . lol