Here are a couple that I built, the walnut conversion is specifically a squeeze fit for old Schon shafts. I'm sure that's not enough for you, but whatever.
You were told you how to safely remove the bolt, but you are a joker who came to puff his chest out. Good luck with your project
View attachment 743905
View attachment 743906
View attachment 743907
And in
direct response to your post:
1) "Here are a couple that I built, the walnut conversion is specifically a squeeze fit for old Schon shafts. I'm sure that's not enough for you, but whatever."
a) Well done, good looking joints, that tells me you care about your work but, your last comment of "whatever" indicates you are trying to end the conversation because you know don't want be involved with this conversation anymore. i.e - you're a quitter - not quite a white flag, but close enough.
2) "You were told you how to safely remove the bolt, but you are a joker who came to puff his chest out. Good luck with your project"
I will actually break this down into three parts but first:
Let's point out the grammatical error - "You were told
you how to safely remove the bolt" - It's safe to say you made this error in haste but in case you weren't aware (which is what happens when responding in haste), you added an additional
you in there, I'm actually assuming it was made in haste/anger for being called out but, bygones.
And just for fun, I will break down my own post - yes, I am mocking you for a grammatical error but I don't want that to distract you, or others, from the details of this post, that's just me responding in like kind.
A) "You were told you how to safely remove the bolt"
a) Removing the weight bolt does nothing for my quest of a properly balanced, and already overweight cue.
B) "but you are a joker who came to puff his chest out"
a) LOL, reading comprehension may be lacking with you (do you not re-read the whole thread (or at least the conversation at hand) before you respond - don't worry, I fully admit I do that sometimes (which doesn't mean the reply isn't warranted) and I feel like an idiot, can you admit that?). Go back and read the thread (and ask the mods to show you the posts that were removed due to personal attacks) and you'll find that I came here to ask a technical question in the 'Ask The Cuemaker' (you still haven't proved you're a cue maker, I've made/modified cues also, that doesn't make me a cue maker - if I were a cue maker, I wouldn't be asking these questions, would I, genius) forum about modifying a cue to better suit my needs/wants/personal preferences and was personally attacked - which is against the rules by the way*. I understand there are people that have some apprehension because it is a classic cue built by a respected cue builder and if there's anything that proves my point - it's this thread - the last thing I want to do is destroy a classic cue built by a cue builder I respect. Point being, I didn't stick my chest out, I responded in kind to those that did. Deal with it.
C) "Good luck with your project"
a) Again, that's an attempt, by you, to end the conversation because 1) you have better things to do with your time (which would disappoint me because it means you didn't put any real thought into any of your replies or 2) you have no idea what you're talking about and only responded to puff your own chest out.
*For the record, my number one issue with AZB is I despise the rules because this is supposed to be a virtual pool room and the pool rooms I grew up in you were able to speak your mind (you voice your opinion, I voice mine, you cuss at me, I cuss at you, then we go have biscuits and gravy at Perkins at 2AM and laugh about it all), but here there are people like you that get a pass for starting sh** because you're a long standing member so and it's those very people that prevent people from coming on here and giving their input due to fear of retaliation.