Is it a legal bank shot when...

VTEC John

Active member
... the CB and OB are just off the rail, close to straight in, and you slide the OB into the pocket off the rail. I guess that qualifies as a bank shot, true? Thanks.
 
No! The rail adjacent the pocket is not a bank.
... the CB and OB are just off the rail, close to straight in, and you slide the OB into the pocket off the rail. I guess that qualifies as a bank shot, true? Thanks.

Well unless you are playing the young man I encountered in Canada. His daddy told him otherwise. 🤷‍♂️
 
... the CB and OB are just off the rail, close to straight in, and you slide the OB into the pocket off the rail. I guess that qualifies as a bank shot, true? Thanks.
Interesting question, literally I would say yes, intuitively I would say no. Maybe to qualify as a 'bank' the object ball would have to be pocketed in a pocket other than the one it's facing? Will be interesting to see what others think!
 
Last edited:
Adjacent rail is not a bank. That makes sense. Is it a rule?
Surely there's a rule somewhere...

Screenshot 2025-09-09 202623.png
 
Last edited:
I'm sure you're aware you can't do anything about a blocking ball besides try and move it with the CB or waste a shot shooting it elsewhere. No combination banks, banked combinations, no kissed in anything - not sure about billiarded banks but I imagine those are taboo too. Half the time a ball near a pocket is functionally out of play.
Stiffer than those mano a mano knife fights you see in the movies.
 
@Frosty

Remixed for this post:
Banks to me are connective shots. I wouldn't ever go too deep into banks as the prime directive.

And yeah, the rules are anti pool. Stupid. It's like world class bar rules.
I'm sure you're aware you can't do anything about a blocking ball besides try and move it with the CB or waste a shot shooting it elsewhere. No combination banks, banked combinations, no kissed in anything - not sure about billiarded banks but I imagine those are taboo too. Half the time a ball near a pocket is functionally out of play.
Stiffer than those mano a mano knife fights you see in the movies.
Remove the limitations and then maybe you can get something happening.
 
This brings up the question, how far away from a cushion does a ball have to be before contact is non-incidental ??
I think the only thing that matters is whether the rail it hits is adjacent to the pocket it goes into. If it hits an adjacent rail it's still good (but a bank shot must hit a non-adjacent rail before hitting the adjacent one).

pj
chgo
 
I think the only thing that matters is whether the rail it hits is adjacent to the pocket it goes into. If it hits an adjacent rail it's still good (but a bank shot must hit a non-adjacent rail before hitting the adjacent one).
An extreme case is where you play a long bank near a side rail and the object ball nicks the point of the side rail before the side pocket, and then by a small miracle goes into the corner. The rule quoted above does not allow that as an incidental rail on a technicality -- that's a different "rail section".

Which leads to the question, if you play a ball off the point of the side pocket to go into the farther corner on that side, is that a bank shot?

There are some other improbable bank shots for which the rule is unclear.
 
Back
Top