Is it a legal bank shot when...
- Thread starter VTEC John
- Start date
No! The rail adjacent the pocket is not a bank.
Well unless you are playing the young man I encountered in Canada. His daddy told him otherwise.
Well unless you are playing the young man I encountered in Canada. His daddy told him otherwise.
L.S. Dennis
Well-known member
Interesting question, literally I would say yes, intuitively I would say no. Maybe to qualify as a 'bank' the object ball would have to be pocketed in a pocket other than the one it's facing? Will be interesting to see what others think!
Last edited:
Surely there's a rule somewhere...
Bank puhl eez a dum gaym.
VTEC John
Active member
Adjacent rail is not a bank. That makes sense. Is it a rule?No! The rail adjacent the pocket is not a bank.
Well unless you are playing the young man I encountered in Canada. His daddy told him otherwise.
Nopit ain’t.
Last edited:
You must not bank well
Yeah I know.
Banks to me are connective shots. I wouldn't ever go too deep into banks as the prime directive.
And yeah, the rules are anti pool. Stupid. It's like world class bar rules. Remove the limitations and then maybe you can get something happening.
VTEC John
Active member
Thanks!
That's like the old tavern rule; it has to go in clean. Yes and after the shot when you call foul, I'll stuff your head in the side pocket without hitting a rail.
I'm sure you're aware you can't do anything about a blocking ball besides try and move it with the CB or waste a shot shooting it elsewhere. No combination banks, banked combinations, no kissed in anything - not sure about billiarded banks but I imagine those are taboo too. Half the time a ball near a pocket is functionally out of play.
Stiffer than those mano a mano knife fights you see in the movies.
Stiffer than those mano a mano knife fights you see in the movies.