Brandon, Stevie Moore, both Shuffets. Idk of any other pros. The thing is, they all shot just as well before.
Same point I made about Styer. He puts in the time so would be where he is even if he had not joined the cult.Brandon, Stevie Moore, both Shuffets. Idk of any other pros. The thing is, they all shot just as well before.
Brandon who?Brandon does pretty well as a pro
Shuff.Brandon who?
Brandon shuff not joe bidenBrandon who?
As far as Pros go, its about the same. All the aiming systems in the word aren't going to make them a top proBrandon shuff not joe biden![]()
You missed the point lolShuff.
You are about 15 years too late.I kind of got wrapped up in a discussion (attacked might be an apt term), for challenging a recent FB post by Stan Shuffettt in which he is pocketing balls with a curtain across the table. He claims that he does "not know where the pocket is." He further claims that he is pocketing balls because of his aiming technique. And his followers claim that without that technique the location of the pocket and the ability to pocket balls is something that cannot be achieved. I maintain that any skilled player knows exactly where the pocket is on a table with uniform dimensions and with 5 pockets visible (where could the 6th pocket possibly be without actually seeing it???). So I did this little demo video but of course, I was immediately told by one of Stan's pupils that I did not cover enough of the table (even though I exactly matched the curtain in Stan's video).
Here is my challenge. I am a B level player and I can easily pocket balls through the curtain as shown in this video. I maintain that any player with at least good amateur skills, and all pro players, would have no problem pocketing balls using this setup no matter what aiming method they use. For me, it is just determining the contact point and sending the cure ball to the appropriate ghost ball position (correcting for spin and throw accordingly of course). I would love to see other demonstrations and get feedback on how difficult this is. Any takers?
Wtf? LolYou are about 15 years too late.I also made a curtain video. The reason this forum doesn't have the CTE arguments anymore is that the most ardent followers have been banned from the aiming forum.
You do have to admit, though, that CTE puts you in an overcut alignment, as shown here:
Yeah. I clipped that together from the original 30 minute video. I did not repeat or put any "overcuts" out of order.Wtf? Lol
Nothing better than overcutting the ball and selling out
Like your aiming system.I don't see any point of doing this. Unless you were putting on an exhibition, proposition shot for money or trying to sell something.
Holy Cow another Michael Hurley fan!!!!We fill up our guts then we turn it into shit then we get rid of it
Suthen logic. Maybe in the sweltering south, a natural overcut is a good thing. Close To Enough aiming - can I mention Tyler Styer here? Maybe he switched to a more reliable hybrid. ?Like your aiming system.
Although I think Shuffett believed all the nonsensical things he said about it.
pj
chgo
Just gotta have faith! Believe it really hard, and the sky's the limit. It's your right to ignore logic and reason. Math and facts are elitist.I'm still waiting for the MATHEMATICAL PROOF that someone claimed they had, to put all arguments to rest.
Of course it never ever materialized.
Why would anyone try to sell an aiming system??Like your aiming system.
Although I think Shuffett believed all the nonsensical things he said about it.
pj
chgo
IIRC Hal Houle was an information officer. Wuz that mean anyway?Why would anyone try to sell an aiming system??
Surely there's easier and better money to be had out there??