WilliamK
Registered
Does the Kelly Pool that you play use secretly drawn numbers to nominate the ball that each player needs to win?When was the last time anyone here played Kelly Pool?
Does the Kelly Pool that you play use secretly drawn numbers to nominate the ball that each player needs to win?When was the last time anyone here played Kelly Pool?
more interesting characters and maybe more fun to watch, but today's game is at a higher levelI don't mean a better standard. I mean was it more exciting to be a top player, more enjoyable to watch, more interesting in general?
It all just seems a little bit less entertaining now.
in the end, it's matter of perspective or which angle you are looking it from. there are pros and cons for sure. I'm just glad that the game exists and still be able to enjoy it. Pros for me, a lot more equipment, a lot more options and a lot more people enjoying the game and not just being an old retiree's game (Really good thread here. What we have seen is that some interpret pool as the serious tournament scene, others interpret it as the action scene, and yet others interpret it as the culture in the poolroom itself. In fact, in this respect, this thread has been what AZB is all about. Most of us who post here do so because we love the game. but each of us loves different things about it. Through the eyes of many of this forum's very finest posters, we have learned that whether pool is better today than in the golden age of pool comes down to what it is that you enjoy the most about the game.
I'd be surprised if this does not prove to be one of the very best threads of 2026.
So true. The game means many different things to people.Really good thread here. What we have seen is that some interpret pool as the serious tournament scene, others interpret it as the action scene, and yet others interpret it as the culture in the poolroom itself. In fact, in this respect, this thread has been what AZB is all about. Most of us who post here do so because we love the game. but each of us loves different things about it. Through the eyes of many of this forum's very finest posters, we have learned that whether pool is better today than in the golden age of pool comes down to what it is that you enjoy the most about the game.
I'd be surprised if this does not prove to be one of the very best threads of 2026.
Generally, "your" pill designates your ball. You make it and everyone pays you. But there are a lot of variations for gambling.Does the Kelly Pool that you play use secretly drawn numbers to nominate the ball that each player needs to win?
Only a little less entertaining? Pool is boring as hell now. All the players using the same exact breaking method, all of the time, lol. It seems like they are all copying each other.
And, what is with that stupid looking Cut Break, that all the pros are now doing? What happened to the days of the random power break?
Now, it is all pattern racking, soft breaks, and all players doing exactly the same thing.
It must have been way more exciting, and interesting, back in the 70's.
Great post. There's no question that the decline in America's standing in the world of pro pool is, for some, a reason to view the past more favorably than the present. For me, I've never been much of a pool patriot, more inclined to enjoy great play regardless of who is producing it.
Now here would be a team match that would put asses in the seats: One team decked out in tuxedos, the other team in wifebeaters.I miss the time where they were wearing formal clothings.![]()
Stu, I think you have to distinguish between the sort of players you'd find in tournaments and the sort of players you'd find in action rooms. Alex is certainly as entertaining as any golden age player you would've found in tournaments BITD, but once you got into gambling matches that's when you'd see characters coming out of the woodwork, woofing and showboating as a way of psyching out their opponents. When these players competed in tournaments they'd tone down their act, but removed from that restricted environment, that's when the legends were developed.I'd call Alex Pagulayan, whose career is still in progress. the most entertaining player that I have ever watched. Good luck finding a comparable entertainer from the golden age of pool.
In a way I compare pool to my other favorite sport: Baseball.Was pool better 50 years ago. No. Has been fun since the late 50’s. Every phase from day 1 until today has been a lot of fun.
changing times and a lot more other stuff to do. I was born in a time where entertainment was limited and you have to find yourself a hobby to pass the time. nowadays, we got streaming services, youtube, internet, VR, dating apps, etc... I can't even manage to keep up with things in my life. there is no constant anymore in this generation unless you wanted to get stuck in the past. so it was easier back then to just focus on one thing because there was less distraction. I got back to pool since I'm not that as active and young anymore to engage with my previous sports activities and hobbies and wanted something more relaxing and keep my mind off the busy life. also, pool does seem to get me back to concentrating better again.One big change I have seen is the lack of pool halls in my area. I grew up in Northern Missouri and Southern Iowa. When I was a kid almost every little town had a pool hall. Snooker was very popular back then. All those pool halls are gone now. Sure we still have bars that will have a bar box or two but it just isn't the same.
Phila Warriors (pre 6'rs)...... cheapest seats and sneak down to the lower balcony.After a few innings, you could sneak into the box seats and for the most part the ushers wouldn't care.
So there are tradeoffs. Cheap tickets for good seats are a thing of the past,
The players are better nowI don't doubt that standards are better today. That's just the way of it in nearly all games and sports, partly because of better equipment and partly because the players are just better.
But it just has kinda lost something for me.
Funny, you just mentioned one of my first sports heroes, Neil Johnston. Since Washington didn't then have an NBA team and my mom was from Philly, I attached myself to the Warriors in a year where they went something like 12 and 57. But IIRC Johnston still led the league in scoring.Phila Warriors (pre 6'rs)...... cheapest seats and sneak down to the lower balcony.
![]()