Is there a way to use the parallel shift system of kicking for banks? Or something similar. Looking for a quick way to measure 2 rail banks either in my head or with my cue, that doesn't involve counting diamonds. Thanks.
@qolbrand
I think not really. Banks are effected way too much with spin. You need to first have precise cue tip placement, and at that point systems are just a crutch. It is a lot of feel.
Yea but kicks are affected heavily by spin and there's plenty of systems for those. I'm sure there's something simple out there that I just don't know of that will give you a solid line, atleast as a reference.I think not really. Banks are effected way too much with spin. You need to first have precise cue tip placement, and at that point systems are just a crutch. It is a lot of feel.
I think not really. Banks are effected way too much with spin. You need to first have precise cue tip placement, and at that point systems are just a crutch. It is a lot of feel.
whether you use a system or notI think not really. Banks are effected way too much with spin. You need to first have precise cue tip placement, and at that point systems are just a crutch. It is a lot of feel.
I think both banks and kicks are effected more by changes in speed than spin. Spin does play a role.I think not really. Banks are effected way too much with spin. You need to first have precise cue tip placement, and at that point systems are just a crutch. It is a lot of feel.
not without organizing thousands of attempts by degree of success - after the 10,000 attempts to get a feel for it.Is there a way to use the parallel shift system of kicking for banks? Or something similar. Looking for a quick way to measure 2 rail banks either in my head or with my cue, that doesn't involve counting diamonds. Thanks.
I would think the parallel shift system for kicking would work reasonably well for banks as well as long as you take into account whatever spin your banked ball will be picking up from the cue ball if any, take into account whether your banked object ball is rolling or sliding when it hits the first rail, and take into account the speed you are banking the object ball and then adjust for those as needed just as you would have to adjust for the speed of the cue ball and the amount and type of spin on it if you were kicking.Is there a way to use the parallel shift system of kicking for banks? Or something similar. Looking for a quick way to measure 2 rail banks either in my head or with my cue, that doesn't involve counting diamonds. Thanks.
i think knowing the lines is the first part, but no, i don’t have anything in mine for banks.
If a player does not have the cueing accuracy to avoid unintentional spin, then he should be working only on fundamentals and ball pocketing basics, not kicks and banks.systems are not a crutch
whether you use a system or not
unintentional spin will cause problems with banking/kicking/ and pocketing balls even if you are playing by feel
banks more by speed. but kicks since its just the cueball, spin can send it out of wack more easily than speed.I think both banks and kicks are effected more by changes in speed than spin. Spin does play a role.
Good posts. IMO systems can get you in the ballpark. But if you seriously watch and analyze what happens when you kick or bank and you will very soon be playing by feel, and at a very high level.If a player does not have the cueing accuracy to avoid unintentional spin, then he should be working only on fundamentals and ball pocketing basics, not kicks and banks.
Systems are a huge distraction if you can't even hit a ball with precision. They can also be a distraction even if you can.
Good choice. The reason this is a good choice is because all balls will eventually roll with straight top, natural roll. Naturally rolling balls will rebound off of a rail with a smaller angle (come out longer) than incident, so if you can master and memorize this change for all incident angles then you are golden.I almost never use anything but straight high when kicking
do you mean cb (cue ball) not ob (object ball)?Good posts. IMO systems can get you in the ballpark. But if you seriously watch and analyze what happens when you kick or bank and you will very soon be playing by feel, and at a very high level.
The thing it, most people when not great at either will be tentative as hell. They usually either pop up or don't really watch what happens with the balls.
I'm a huge proponent for watching the OB when you kick. Line up where you think you should and then watch the OB while pulling the trigger. It will give you a wealth of information on what happened. I'm much more accurate watching the OB while I kick. It's so much about speed control (I almost never use anything but straight high when kicking). Watching the OB will instantly tune you into how the rails are reacting.
for those like me who wanted to be sure what "orthogonally" meantGood choice. The reason this is a good choice is because all balls will eventually roll with straight top, natural roll. Naturally rolling balls will rebound off of a rail with a smaller angle (come out longer) than incident, so if you can master and memorize this change for all incident angles then you are golden.
As a general rule, when a ball loses angular momentum with a rail collision (as with a rolling ball) the energy has to go somewhere, and it ends up being transferred into the perpendicular linear momentum (PLM) component to the rail. In other-words, the ball comes off of the rail "faster" orthogonally. The opposite is true, when a sliding ball with no spin hits a rail, energy is transferred from the PLM to angular momentum (spin) and comes off "slower" orthogonally. This is dominant, ignoring energy that is actually lost to the rail rubber itself.
This is also why running English helps keep the incident and rebound angles similar, because it minimizes a change in angular momentum during the collision.
for those like me who had to be sure what perpendicular linear momentum meansGood choice. The reason this is a good choice is because all balls will eventually roll with straight top, natural roll. Naturally rolling balls will rebound off of a rail with a smaller angle (come out longer) than incident, so if you can master and memorize this change for all incident angles then you are golden.
As a general rule, when a ball loses angular momentum with a rail collision (as with a rolling ball) the energy has to go somewhere, and it ends up being transferred into the perpendicular linear momentum (PLM) component to the rail. In other-words, the ball comes off of the rail "faster" orthogonally. The opposite is true, when a sliding ball with no spin hits a rail, energy is transferred from the PLM to angular momentum (spin) and comes off "slower" orthogonally. This is dominant, ignoring energy that is actually lost to the rail rubber itself.
This is also why running English helps keep the incident and rebound angles similar, because it minimizes a change in angular momentum during the collision.
so if i cant hit where i am aimingIf a player does not have the cueing accuracy to avoid unintentional spin, then he should be working only on fundamentals and ball pocketing basics, not kicks and banks.
Systems are a huge distraction if you can't even hit a ball with precision. They can also be a distraction even if you can.
there are many kicks you will not be successful at without knowing how to kick with spin.I almost never use anything but straight high when kicking.