Some AI levity...................

AI is not up to speed in matters pool.

Search on the Rifleman and you won't get Buddy Hall, you'll get an old TV show. Search on Earthquake and you won't get Keith Mccready but seismic activity instead. Search on the Kentucky Colonel and you'll get fried chicken, not Nick Varner.

What the world needs is a pool-oriented AI.
 
Last edited:
AI is not up to speed in matters pool.

Search on the Rifleman and you won't get Buddy Hall, you'll get an old TV show. Search on Earthquake and you won't get Keith Macready but seismic activity instead. Search on the Kentucky Colonel and you'll get fried chicken, not Nick Varner.

What the world needs is a pool-oriented AI.
Or not....;)
 
AI is not up to speed in matters pool.

Search on the Rifleman and you won't get Buddy Hall, you'll get an old TV show. Search on Earthquake and you won't get Keith Macready but seismic activity instead. Search on the Kentucky Colonel and you'll get fried chicken, not Nick Varner.

What the world needs is a pool-oriented AI.
It is "up to speed" if you tell it to be. It all depends on the prompts.
 
I was just doing a search looking to see if Bluegrass cues were still made. AI came with this: Yes, Richard Harris is still making cues. The picture posted was of Richard Harris, the famous actor. Fkng AI/Chat can kiss my ass.
So...did you tell it about the error?

What AI did you use? What did you ask it?

I just tried Gemini, with no preliminary prompts (it does not know who I am). It did not give an erroneous picture.

I also tried a version of Claude not publicly available. Again, no initial prompts. No ID error on Harris.

I asked "Are Bluegrass cues were still made?"
 
It is "up to speed" if you tell it to be. It all depends on the prompts.
I ran your username through a while back and it was pretty accurate about your forum posting. Said you were an authority on cues, blah blah blah …but I laughed when it said “beware though, if you buy a cue signed by Chopdoc or have Chopdoc sign your cue it will decrease the value of it.” Lol. I don’t know where it came up with that. Or specifically why it felt the need to add that.

It explained further that collectors prefer cues not to be signed by anyone other than the cue maker or something. Which is accurate but I don’t think I’ve ever heard of you signing cues.
 
I ran your username through a while back and it was pretty accurate about your forum posting. Said you were an authority on cues, blah blah blah …but I laughed when it said “beware though, if you buy a cue signed by Chopdoc or have Chopdoc sign your cue it will decrease the value of it.” Lol. I don’t know where it came up with that. Or specifically why it felt the need to add that.

It explained further that collectors prefer cues not to be signed by anyone other than the cue maker or something. Which is accurate but I don’t think I’ve ever heard of you signing cues.
Hmmmm...that gives me an idea... :unsure: ;)

Me? Sign a cue? :rolleyes:

Only if you want to destroy the value I guess.
 
I ran your username through a while back and it was pretty accurate about your forum posting. Said you were an authority on cues, blah blah blah …but I laughed when it said “beware though, if you buy a cue signed by Chopdoc or have Chopdoc sign your cue it will decrease the value of it.” Lol. I don’t know where it came up with that. Or specifically why it felt the need to add that.

It explained further that collectors prefer cues not to be signed by anyone other than the cue maker or something. Which is accurate but I don’t think I’ve ever heard of you signing cues.
How is this?

image_5da0c2e5.jpg
 
I ran your username through a while back and it was pretty accurate about your forum posting. Said you were an authority on cues, blah blah blah …but I laughed when it said “beware though, if you buy a cue signed by Chopdoc or have Chopdoc sign your cue it will decrease the value of it.” Lol. I don’t know where it came up with that. Or specifically why it felt the need to add that.

It explained further that collectors prefer cues not to be signed by anyone other than the cue maker or something. Which is accurate but I don’t think I’ve ever heard of you signing cues.
By the way, if you didn't use incognito mode, and you used an AI that is "personalized" (you may not even know), or if you have it installed as an app, and had researched any cue signatures, that would be why it made that comment. It is anticipating what you want to know.

Unless I want it to know who I am I generally will use an AI anonymously.

I have AI set up for medical teaching, it has all my credentials and teaching methods set up with special prompts. Essentially, it acts as a teaching assistant. I don't use it for real case consults. And I don't use the OpenEvidence AI app that is very popular with clinicians today.

I also have AI set up for anonymous use. I have access to a powerful AI that the public does not. I also have access to an AI for research purposes that I can't really play with but it is amazingly powerful. And I have an AI agent installed locally...sometimes it tries to get out...

why-you-bully-me-jail.gif
 
I was just doing a search looking to see if Bluegrass cues were still made. AI came with this: Yes, Richard Harris is still making cues. The picture posted was of Richard Harris, the famous actor. Fkng AI/Chat can kiss my ass.
AI is not up to speed in matters pool.

Search on the Rifleman and you won't get Buddy Hall, you'll get an old TV show. Search on Earthquake and you won't get Keith Macready but seismic activity instead. Search on the Kentucky Colonel and you'll get fried chicken, not Nick Varner.

What the world needs is a pool-oriented AI.
I dont trust Al or GPS. Been led down many wrong roads or dead ends.
 
By the way, if you didn't use incognito mode, and you used an AI that is "personalized" (you may not even know), or if you have it installed as an app, and had researched any cue signatures, that would be why it made that comment. It is anticipating what you want to know.

Unless I want it to know who I am I generally will use an AI anonymously.

I have AI set up for medical teaching, it has all my credentials and teaching methods set up with special prompts. Essentially, it acts as a teaching assistant. I don't use it for real case consults. And I don't use the OpenEvidence AI app that is very popular with clinicians today.

I also have AI set up for anonymous use. I have access to a powerful AI that the public does not. I also have access to an AI for research purposes that I can't really play with but it is amazingly powerful. And I have an AI agent installed locally...sometimes it tries to get out...

why-you-bully-me-jail.gif
Yeah. I usually check both regular and incognito. I also have a subscription to a different one that I mostly use professionally.
 
I dont trust Al or GPS. Been led down many wrong roads or dead ends.
Using the consumer free ones like Gemini or copilot are kind of like being a detective investigating a murder with 22 witnesses who all saw something different and 5 different medical examiners who have slightly differing opinions. You have to do a lot of sifting through bs.
 
I dont trust Al or GPS. Been led down many wrong roads or dead ends.
GPS?

The Crazy Redhead confuses right and left. She'll say "turn right" and point left. I can't tell you how many times I have slammed on the brakes mid-turn when she yells "no! the other way!".

I don't trust AI or GPS...or The Crazy Redhead.

Using AI and trusting it are two entirely different things. Same as marriage. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Using the consumer free ones like Gemini or copilot are kind of like being a detective investigating a murder with 22 witnesses who all saw something different and 5 different medical examiners who have slightly differing opinions. You have to do a lot of sifting through bs.
image_52263076.jpg
 
Back
Top