Search results

I thought it was excellent. "When hitting a bank shot hard do you have to aim for more angle or less angle?" The effect of hitting hard is to shorten the path so aim to miss long (more angle) and swing away. RTFQS!

You know what Joey Diaz says about wings with ranch dressing.

Earl Strickland Interview on the Behind Bars Podcast: Classic Earl with some interesting ideas, as always.

He was definitely whispering to those balls and they was listening. Art.

Tony Chohan finishing up on SVB: And that's why I like watching TC.

You just need a case pet. This one would fit in a coffee cup. The branch is the size of your thumb:

I'm shooting a New Sheriff cue with a NS CF shaft, 12.4mm, 19.5oz Spanish bull wrap, curly maple. I bought a second New Sheriff cue for my wife with his cf shaft. I liked the way hers hit so much better than mine with a different brand cf shaft that I had him make me one. The hit on this cue...

Cool. Click it and it will disappear forever.

Last posted Dec 31. Last seen viewing this thread. Maybe we're his New Years resolution.

I'm not the one on the pout.

You wouldn't be taking silly cheap shots at moderation, would you?

Could you report that announcement? I'm not seeing it but I'm old and slow.......

This is how it was explained to me: In a 1787 dictionary, El Diccionario Castellano, Esteban de Terreros explained: "Foreigners in Malaga are called gringos, who have particular kinds of accent that deprive them from easy and natural Castilian speech, and in Madrid the name is given especially...

"Gringo" indicates someone not fluent in Spanish, nothing more.

That was sorta my thought. If you can't watch a person play and know whether or not you can beat him don't bet. If you know you've got him it isn't "gambling".

I've been getting these, too. And the site has been slow. I'm running 100Mbps download, don't think it's me.

There is no discussion of 1st amendment rights on private enterprises. The first amendment restricts government, not Mike and AZB and not Twitter and Elon. Either can censor anything they wish, the sites are their property and are not governed by Constitutional amendments.

That seems pretty straight forward. It protects citizens from government censorship and protects the press from government. Private enterprises like this board are not covered under freedom of speech. If Mike decided to ban someone for say, name calling, that would be his prerogative and the...

I saw what he said and let's see if we can find out what the 1st amendment says: The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people...

How would the 1st amendment apply to AZB?