Search results

This is exactly the team I would send! I just do not understand the criteria for making the cut into the final 8. I would have them play for it in more than one setting. Then pick the top performers for that pool of players.

If you use just the diamond system in his illustration (line one) you miss the shot...

Dude...I haven't seen previous posts. I just jumped right in after Corey was talking about what he's going to be doing in the future. Good five though burro!

That is a strong five there!

Obviously I was unaware there was a pool of players Mark was choosing from. Leaving it up to Mark to choose sounds good to me. Was the pool this small to begin with? All this thread asks is what AZ members would want for the five chosen players It amazes me how you want to be a Donkey about...

No, but he is a very strong player that I thought someone would add to the list. I had no idea John has been talking about the Mosconi Cup. That means he must be training for the opportunity to represent!

Jay Helfert has a saying that works well in judging a shot like this. Whitey never lies. That is the cueball will tell you by its rebound angle what ball was hit first.

I haven't tipped my hand yet on what my five would be but I will say are you peeking at my cards Satori? Come on...what's your five?

Three things affect a bank shot: Contact point on the object bank, how hard you hit it, and the English applied. This system works as long as you don't apply English or hit the shot harder. Also when the object ball is close to the rail (within one to two ball lengths) it can affect the...

Okay to me the first two are gimme's...Shane Van Boening and Cory Deuel. The third would have to be Justin Bergman but the water starts getting murky after that. You have Oscar Dominguez, Sky Woodward, Brandon Shuff, Earl Strickland, Chip Compton, Joey Gray, Mike Dechaine, Johnny Archer, Alex...

I agree with you Jaden and I would like to add that Confidence is a big factor here as well. If your playing well it makes the decision making is so much easier. Thus not much time thinking about it.

Many shots in pool can be defensive in nature requiring additional thought. Sometimes you are caught between two choices and they seem equal in promise. It doesn't matter how much time you take. Walk around the table during this time and "play the movie out" in your head. That is, visualize...

Assuming both players ran out on their break in every game...no.

+6 was the largest package...

First use the cueball to iron the cloth. Second use a shaft to find out which balls are smaller than the others and rack them to the outside perimeter. When the balls are different sizes there is no way to get them touching with any rack. Ironing the cloth will keep all but the headball from...

When it happens soda water from a soft drink soda fountain usually works on most stains by lifting it off. Then in the washer later with shout and add some oxyclean...

3/4...7/8...1 inch. The thinner the easier it is to transport. Two piece and three piece slate makes it even lighter than the one piece. Performance wise the 7/8 and one inch over time i would think would do you well but that's just a guess. I will let a table mechanic chime in now...

He gave up the game.

Jam nobody could tell a story like Smorgie...miss that guy. :( Thanks for bring back the laughs!

No, not necessarily. Because the the brain in that instance will acclimate to a constant flux of feedback.