Scroll down. Another thread on this. 66-25 i think. I quit watchin it.Day One....Sky 33....Earl 16
What is the Score After Day 2?
I just watched an interview with Earl and Sky from earlier today. Earl said he needed 72 more games to win and Sky needed 36. That would put the score at 64-28. 64 seems like a strange place to stop, but maybe time issues or something else stopped it there. Or maybe Earl's memory was off a bit.
Any Score updates?
.. No.. looking to see if Earl can break 50%.. Getting a gauge on the 'Mental hospital stay' for odds on admission...Do you think there is a comeback in progress? :rotflmao:
How would the Earl of 25 years ago do against the Sky of today?
How would the Earl of 25 years ago do against the Sky of today?
How would the Earl of 25 years ago do against the Sky of today?
I didn't watch this match, but from the other thread there was talk that Earl was in his meltdown mode full force...
Question for Jay or any others that have been around Earl a long time. Did he ever have his "give-up" mode when he was gambling on his own dime? I'm wondering how he would fare today mentally if he played Sky a normal set, lets say race to 11 for 1000, and it was only Sky and Earl putting up 1000 each.
He's a nut
I didn't watch this match, but from the other thread there was talk that Earl was in his meltdown mode full force...
Question for Jay or any others that have been around Earl a long time. Did he ever have his "give-up" mode when he was gambling on his own dime? I'm wondering how he would fare today mentally if he played Sky a normal set, lets say race to 11 for 1000, and it was only Sky and Earl putting up 1000 each.
Earl was a great money player before he ever played in tournaments. He was playing jam up at age 19! That Earl would have wiped the floor with today's Sky. But he is long gone.
What are you trying to say? Parica is one of the all-time greats. He led the Pinoy invasion and was one of the best gambling players ever. Earl would have been great on any size pockets. He played on what was around then. Great players, of any era, will adjust to whatever equipment is the norm. Its like comparing top golfers, the best would have been top players regardless of the era or equipment. Mosconi, Caras, et.al. played on BUCKETS but no one seems to knock them for it. Please.But, he lost to Parica ?
I really wonder though how Early would have done against the really good players today on Diamonds with tight pockets.
But, he lost to Parica ?
I really wonder though how Early would have done against the really good players today on Diamonds with tight pockets.
No doubt. That's a pretty long list. Earl wasn't the only top player to get a dose of Jose's game.EVERYONE lost to Parica!