We have a "no safety" rule.
In other words you can't play an obvious safety.
I quit reading after that.
When the rules are such that arguments are guaranteed because of those rules, like someone said, family first.
Jeff Livingston
We have a "no safety" rule.
In other words you can't play an obvious safety.
Two good things happened from all this.Local Friday night 8-ball tournament. $10 entry and small $ calcutta.
I'm in the hot seat waiting to face the winner of B side.
It's my cousin who hardly ever plays pool anymore and it's his first time
to play in this tournament. His opponent is Tyrone, a regular in the tourney
and a league player as well. He is the biggest whiner I've ever seen in my
life. Always moaning about something or other. We have a "no safety" rule.
In other words you can't play an obvious safety. Anytime you leave Tyrone
no shot he gripes that you did so on purpose!!!!
Anyway, it gets down to the last 3 for my cousin. I'm sitting right next to the
table, Tyrone is 10 feet away at the corner of the bar. My cousin sinks the
last two and gets straight in on the 8. He's a foot away from the 8 which is
a foot away from the corner pocket. He gets over it to shoot and I holler at
him "call the pocket". My cousin points at the hole and makes the ball.
Tyrone comes over and bows up at me and raises holy hell. He did wait
briefly until my cousin MADE the shot.
I DID feel very guilty. I know better and have never done anything like this
before. But I KNEW that Tyrone was the ONE guy in the tournament who
would have called him on it and told him he lost the game. And I told him so.
It was a heated moment and a lot of trash was talked. Him talking "rules"
and that a "no call" would have been a loss. Me telling him he would be
the only person in the tournament chickenshit enough to call it on someone
on such an obvious shot and he'd be the only one to want to win that way.
But I felt I was still in the wrong to do it and offered to give up my place,
take third, and let the two battle it out for first (although the guy who bought
me in the calcutta didn't like this option). In fact, the guy who bought me was
running the tournament. He knows what a sore loser Tyrone is and said
don't worry about it. My cousin was a new player and didn't know the rules.
But as soon as I made the offer Tyrone unscrewed and said "F..k y'all, give
me third place and I'm never coming back!!!!" And then he stormed out.
I KNOW I was in the wrong....but HOW wrong was I ????
And all pool players are crybabies. .
. None of these guys are serious players if they are playing honest john 8 ball.
In my opinion, you shouldn't have said anything...but you already know that. And by you admitting that you felt wrong immediately after saying it, you already knew it wasn't right beforehand. Lesson learned.
That said, two rules need to be added/changed from the ones you now play under. 1.) An obvious shot need not be called, and 2.) Any legal form of safety play should be allowed. It's part of the game and it will put an end to arguments of whether a player was shooting an intentional safety or not.
Get with the TD and discuss my proposed rule changes. Arguing in a bar (where people/players are drinking) can sometimes lead to violence between players. I'd get this fixed ASAP.
Maniac
You dogg'd it. Stay OUT of other people's s^*t. Period. You're not in church and i'm assuming your cousin had on his big-boy pants.
...As far as the "no safety" rule it was put in play to give the not so talented
players a fighting chance....
1-41
Coaching
1. During your match, it is a foul if you ask for, or intentionally receive, assistance in planning or executing any shot.
2. It is a foul if you receive unsolicited assistance from a spectator associated with you (e.g., spouse/partner, relative, teammate). “Assistance” includes being alerted to an opponent’s foul.
3. If you are not aware of an opponent’s foul, and you are alerted to the foul by unsolicited information from a spectator not associated with you, the foul is not enforceable but you do not incur any additional penalty.
Exception: In scotch doubles or team play, a violation of Rule 1.8, No Practice Allowed During Match, may be called on any member of the opponent’s team by any member of the offended team, regardless of whether they or the offending player are at the table or involved in a game. Other modifications of Rule 1-41 concerning team or doubles play may be made by the Administrative Authority.
4. Any spectator not associated with you who offers any significant unsolicited assistance to you, whether verbal or non-verbal, will be warned against further interruptions or removed from the area.
5. The Administrative Authority of the event may modify this rule for team or doubles play. (AR p. 97)
It’s funny to me because I’ve been a “rules monger” for years. I’d play by the letter of the book. It took me longer than it should have to realize that some rules are made to punish someone trying to abuse the game, not punish those playing in good faith that didn’t honor the letter of the book.
I definitely think you shouldn’t have interfered. Tyrone may have called foul but the tournament director should overrule him if he has any real integrity. That’s a sticky situation. But it should be a sticky situation between the TD, Tyrone and your cousin. No additional parties should inject themselves into the outcome unless invited.
But I respect where you where coming from.
Respectfully, Matt
(I don’t take myself too seriously. I hope you can return the favor.)